Honestly. I don't care about 9/11. Don't get me wrong, I care about the people that died and their families. The firefighters and first responders. I care that whatever happened was an attack on us all. What brought me to this thread however, is the charges of mental instability and illness. That's a slippery slope you're on sinnerman and you should knock it off. That kind of reasoning is unproductive and dangerous. A Christian should know better.
The Affliction Of Conspiracy Theorists
- Thread starter Sinnerman
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A lot of people do not believe what I believe, yet I don't call them kooks. Kooks are people who live in denial of verifiable facts. Kooks are people who cling to disproven theories and when questioned as to why they believe something else, they refuse to offer evidence of any kind. There is a big difference between a kook and someone who simply has a different point of view.
Here is what I think. When you place two people calling themselves Christians on an anonymous internet chat site and they debate a topic, like say police brutality, a person calling herself a Christian, will not make disparaging remarks about police officers abusing citizens who are being perfectly compliant with them, and then refuse to offer any evidence of the alleged abuse. That would be bearing false witness. If she went so far as to say she could post several videos showing such abuse to prove she is not bearing false witness against police officers, and then failed to do so, she has failed to meet God's moral imperative, regardless of the excuse she then gives for not providing evidence of her accusation.
If it's your goal to be neither cold nor hot in your Christian life, but lukewarm, well...you know how the verse ends. I would say I am cold right now. A real backslider. Someone who has fallen very far behind in his walk. Nothing like back when I was hot. But I do not wish to be lukewarm. Perhaps you do. That's how you come across to me. Very lukewarm.
Here is what I think. When you place two people calling themselves Christians on an anonymous internet chat site and they debate a topic, like say police brutality, a person calling herself a Christian, will not make disparaging remarks about police officers abusing citizens who are being perfectly compliant with them, and then refuse to offer any evidence of the alleged abuse. That would be bearing false witness. If she went so far as to say she could post several videos showing such abuse to prove she is not bearing false witness against police officers, and then failed to do so, she has failed to meet God's moral imperative, regardless of the excuse she then gives for not providing evidence of her accusation.
If it's your goal to be neither cold nor hot in your Christian life, but lukewarm, well...you know how the verse ends. I would say I am cold right now. A real backslider. Someone who has fallen very far behind in his walk. Nothing like back when I was hot. But I do not wish to be lukewarm. Perhaps you do. That's how you come across to me. Very lukewarm.
Christ spent a good deal of time amongst those who were the most in need. If you are a doctor, you'd go to where the sick people are. The conspiracy thread is very full of people who need help, probably medical or psychiatric help.
Just so where clear here, you've been here 3 1/2 years and posted over 8500 times and you are pretending you don't know how to view another persons posts using a couple simple clicks? I doubt it. You can view all of my posts. I seem to recall posting numerous pages worth of posts about global warming alarmists, and maybe 100 posts in response to threads in the News forum. I even posted in the music forum. What I'm suggesting is you are not being curious. You are sticking your nose into something that is none of your business. You can at least be honest about it. Since you're here, why not tell me if you believe any of the 9/11 conspiracy theories, the JFK conspiracy theories, or that you feel the best way to deal with those who do believe such things is to humor them and enable them.
Just so where clear here, you've been here 3 1/2 years and posted over 8500 times and you are pretending you don't know how to view another persons posts using a couple simple clicks? I doubt it. You can view all of my posts. I seem to recall posting numerous pages worth of posts about global warming alarmists, and maybe 100 posts in response to threads in the News forum. I even posted in the music forum. What I'm suggesting is you are not being curious. You are sticking your nose into something that is none of your business. You can at least be honest about it. Since you're here, why not tell me if you believe any of the 9/11 conspiracy theories, the JFK conspiracy theories, or that you feel the best way to deal with those who do believe such things is to humor them and enable them.
U
You keep inferring you are a doctor....where is the proof, I need some evidence here, a medical license, diploma? By law you are not allowed to diagnose patients without a valid medical license....it is quackery....what makes you qualified to deem/diagnose others as mentally ill/needing psychiatric help????