That "analysis" is commonly called exposition of a Bible verse. This is how the majority of Bible commentators exposit that verse.
that is simply untrue. it shows that you don't read many bible commentaries
It is not false at all. You refute it because correct Bible exposition doesn't fit into the scheme of the amillennialist's interpretation of the Bible prophecy....especially the book of Revelation.
Amillennialism is the correct interpretation of the Bible, as the majority of believers hold.
Amillennialism totally distorts, skews, and twists the Bible to "prove" the false doctrines of Amillennialism.
give me ONE example
That is false. The second coming is found only in Revelation 19, not "a number of times".
LOL try Rev 6, the sixth seal. Rev14 . to name but two. if you deny it you are fighting the obvious to propagate a theory