Dear 'BibleGuy' . . .

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
I am seperating the faith Christ has in justifying someone and ongoing daily faith.

When someone is acknowledging they are a dirty rotten and sinner and need saving.. that's a once off act. That is the point of eternal life being given by Jesus who justifies.

From this.. there WILL be fruit from being saved. That's the result of the Holy Spirit sealing someone's spirit and indwelling them.

What happens though after salvation with commitment to turn from sin from the believer.. that's THE faith.. DAILY faith.. not the act of receiving eternal life.

over.
The work of turning us is His work .He must do the first works every time we repent

Receiving eternal life and maintaining it is all the and same work of the Spirit of Christ, the anointing Holy Spirit of God .

Galatians 3 informs us of that very clearly. If as new creatures we begin with the Spirit it does not end with the flesh, a work we perform.

O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain.He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth he it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? Gal 3:1

We don’t work to gain salvation we work out the salvation he freely gives us .Freely he gives freely we have received.

He is our confidence we are to have zero confidence in the flesh .If he begun the good work of salvation in us he will finish it. He has to do the first work daily of us believing Him as we do receive our daily bread.if he does not work to give us His faith we will be found with no faith.

Joh 6:29 Jesus answered and said unto them, “This is the work of God”, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
My goodness, the hijackers took a good run at this thread! Guys, just ignore PeterJens - as infuriating as his false accusations are about what we believe, don't feed the beast.

This thread is about refuting those who teach Torah observance for believers in Christ. PeterJens is certainly preaching . . . well, one is never sure what PeterJens is preaching, as he is hopelessly doubleminded, but for sure he preaches a mixture of Grace and Law. His message is highly contradictory, whether he even realizes it or not.

And other Torah-folk who come here, well, here's the thing: Preaching the Gospel full-preach both corrects error and brings the Lost to life. Keep in mind the random reader who is hoping to sort out all this Law/Grace stuff. Give them what they need to do so. PeterJens rarely uses Scripture to back up what he says - he mostly just likes to 'hear himself talk', as it were. If he slanders you, report him. Mostly, just ignore him. Others post walls of out-of-context Scriptures strung together to 'prove' their points.

When you bring the Gospel, bring it with contextual Scripture and love, grace, and encouragement!

-JGIG
 

JGIG

Senior Member
Aug 2, 2013
2,295
167
63
.
Now, back to 'Dear BibleGuy' and his points/issues:


.

Originally Posted by BibleGuy

17. You wrote: “Torah, God's instructions before the Cross, were given to Israel at Sinai in the form of the Law.”

My response: And all Christians are included as fellow Israelites who partake in all the covenants between YHVH and Israel. Thus, all Christians should OBEY the Torah of these covenants in which they participate.

Moreover, AFTER the cross, the Apostles and Epistles continue to uphold and affirm our need to obey Mosaic Torah (e.g., 1 Cor. 7:19; 1 Jn. 5:3).



Let's take a look at those passages, shall we? Context is always nice
:):


17 Nevertheless, each person should live as a believer in whatever situation the Lord has assigned to them, just as God has called them. This is the rule I lay down in all the churches. 18 Was a man already circumcised when he was called? He should not become uncircumcised. Was a man uncircumcised when he was called? He should not be circumcised.

19 Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing.
.
Keeping God’s commands is what counts.


20 Each person should remain in the situation they were in when God called them. (from 1 Cor. 7)



The Law clearly states that circumcision is a requirement of the Law. Participation in the Passover Feast is not open to the uncircumcised. And the Passover Feast is a part of the Law, yes?

So how can 'Keeping God's commands is what counts' be a declarative by Paul if circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing??? Clearly, according to the commandments contained in the Law, circumcision is an absolutely required something!

The other option here is that God's commandments, after the Cross, DO NOT include circumsision, OR Feast keeping, OR the other elements found in the Old Covenant because AFTER the Cross the commandments of God are clearly these:


23 And this is his commandment, that we believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another, just as he has commanded us. 24 Whoever keeps his commandments abides in God, and God in him. And by this we know that he abides in us, by the Spirit whom he has given us. (from 1 Jn. 3)


That makes far more sense than pointing believers back to an obsolete covenantal system with a confusing directive to keep God's commandments and then telling them that circumcision is not required when God's commandments in the obsolete Old Covenant require circumcision! Obviously the commandments of God to which Paul is referring are those given after the Cross (see 1 Jn. 3 passage above).


Now for the next one:


1 Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and everyone who loves the father loves his child as well. 2 This is how we know that we love the children of God: by loving God and carrying out his commands. 3 In fact, this is love for God: to keep his commands. And his commands are not burdensome, 4 for everyone born of God overcomes the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith. 5 Who is it that overcomes the world? Only the one who believes that Jesus is the Son of God. (from 1 Jn. 5)



The Torah-centric teacher will tell you that God's commandments referred to by John in 1 Jn. 5 are

A. The laws given to Israel at Sinai, and
B. That John is quoting Deut. 30:11 where God says, "Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach."


Regarding point A: John defines God's commands in the very same letter two chapters prior in 1 Jn. 3:23-24 (see passage quoted above), and they are simply to believe on the One God has sent (Christ) and to love one another. That's it. The simple Gospel.


Regarding point B: In Deut. 30:11 God is referring to two instances when Israel boasted that they would keep all that God commanded, both before and after the giving of the commandments contained in the Law given at Sinai:

8 All the people answered together and said,
All that the Lord has spoken we will do.” (from Ex. 19, before the Law was given)

3 Moses came and told the people all the words of the Lord and all the rules. And all the people answered with one voice and said,
All the words that the Lord has spoken we will do.(from Ex. 24, after the Law was given)


Now let's look again at what God says in Deut. 30:11 -


11 Now what I am commanding you today is not too difficult for you or beyond your reach. 12 It is not up in heaven, so that you have to ask, “Who will ascend into heaven to get it and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?” 13 Nor is it beyond the sea, so that you have to ask, “Who will cross the sea to get it and proclaim it to us so we may obey it?” 14 No, the word is very near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart so you may obey it. (from Deut. 30)

Some speculate, and I agree, that God was using a sarcastic tone with Israel, knowing that they could neither keep the Law as it was given nor was it something that would be easy for them to attempt, hence the built-in sacrificial system. Seems an obvious point that God knew they were bound for failure even in their zeal and pride.

Which raises another question: Why would God give the Law if He knew it couldn't be kept? Seems kind of like a cruel joke, yes? Note that while under a covenant of Grace, the Abrahamic Covenant, Israel grumbled and complained, questioned God's leading, provision, and protection. So God gave them the option of the Law, which put the ball in their court: Obey and live, or disobey and die. They had control in the Law system - their input controlled outcome - and they liked that idea because they thought they could do better with some control instead of trusting God step by step.

God gave them two chances, once before and once after the Law was given, to embrace the Grace that they were already under or embrace the system of Law He presented to them through Moses. In their pride and desire for control, they chose Law: "We will do ALL that the Lord has spoken."

And God had a purpose for the Law - to point out mankind's sin and our need for a Savior. The Law also provided a framework by which Israel would be set apart from the world so that Messiah would be recognized when He came (though Israel had no trouble maintaining their identity before the Law - from Jacob all the way to Moses, even while in captivity by Egypt). The primary necessity of the Law was to show mankind how dreadfully far we fall short of the requirements of God.

Sooooo . . . are THOSE the commandments that John was talking about? The commandments contained in the Law given at Sinai? What was the conclusion of the Apostles who lived under the Law for their whole lives before Christ released them from the Law?

5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.” [Note that they were preaching circumcision, which IS part of the commandments in the Law - refer back to 'neither circumcision nor uncircumcision matters - apparently, according to the Law, it DOES matter!]​

6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith.

10
Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.” (from Acts 15)


Centuries revealed to many in Israel that the demands of the Law was a yoke that neither current Israelites nor Israelites over time had been able to bear. They had learned the lesson the Law was put in place to teach; the Law was our schoolmaster:


24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.

25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.


26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. (from Gal. 3)




Which further illuminates the words of Christ when He says,


28 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.” (from Mt. 11)


​As for BibleGuy's assertion,

"And all Christians are included as fellow Israelites who partake in all the covenants between YHVH and Israel. Thus, all Christians should OBEY the Torah of these covenants in which they participate."


. . . the words of the Apostles in Acts 15 make clear that Gentiles do not become Israel and are not subject to the commandments contained in the Law given at Sinai. The claim that 'all Christians are included as fellow Israelites' is a whole 'nother ball of wax, which, if one is so inclined can read more about HERE and HERE.



Grace and peace,
-JGIG
 

Dan_473

Senior Member
Mar 11, 2014
9,054
1,051
113
I'm glad you're back, JGIG

I hope BibleGuy will return soon as well
 
May 28, 2016
537
3
0
2 Peter 2:19 While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage. 20For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. 21For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. 22But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.
 
May 28, 2016
537
3
0
Romans 16:17 Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. 18For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple. 19For your obedience is come abroad unto all men. I am glad therefore on your behalf: but yet I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil. 20And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen.
 
May 28, 2016
537
3
0
Jude 1:3 Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. 4For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

John 12:44
Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, believeth not on me, but on him that sent me. 45And he that seeth me seeth him that sent me. 46I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me should not abide in darkness. 47And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the world, but to save the world. 48He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. 49For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.50And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.

Matthew 13:40
Just as the weeds are gathered and burned with fire, so will it be at the end of the age. 41The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will gather out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all law-breakers, 42and throw them into the fiery furnace. In that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
 
P

popeye

Guest
Jesus made new laws. Torah does not address them
 
May 28, 2016
537
3
0
Jesus made new laws. Torah does not address them
Malachi 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

John 8:39
They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

Genesis 26:4
And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; 5Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.

James 1:18
Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.19Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath: 20For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.21Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. 22But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. 23For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: 24For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. 25But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
 
P

popeye

Guest
Originally Posted by popeye

Jesus made new laws. Torah does not address them


Malachi 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

John 8:39
They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

Genesis 26:4
And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; 5Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.

James 1:18
Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we should be a kind of firstfruits of his creatures.19Wherefore, my beloved brethren, let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath: 20For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God.21Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. 22But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves. 23For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: 24For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was. 25But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.

I think you need to admit he did,then tell us why you challenge them.

You omitted the new laws.
 
May 19, 2016
417
2
0
Dear JGIG,

As promised....I'm back!

But....you truly tempt me to walk away...

Why? Because you simply do not seem able to understand the "objection vs. definition" confusion you've continued to exemplify, despite my REPEATED exposure of your confusion.

Of course "word" (or “rhema” or “motsa”) is not defined as "Torah"!

BUT, that does NOT entail that the term "word" (or other terms) can not refer to that which INCLUDES Torah.

Now, since you appear incapable of appreciating this point, repeatedly misconstruing my position, repeatedly falsely accusing me of faulty methodology, I'll try this for a moment:

QUESTION FOR JGIG:

Does 2 Ti. 3:16 refer to that which INCLUDES the Torah of Moses?

Ok….I’ll answer for you: OF COURSE!

But wait! Is "pasa graphe" DEFINED as the Torah of Moses? OF COURSE NOT!

Therefore we conclude: A term can REFER to an OBJECT, even though the term is not DEFINED as the OBJECT!

So then, "rhema" can REFER to that which includes the written Torah of Moses, EVEN THOUGH "rhema" is not DEFINED as "the written Torah of Moses".

And EVEN YOU have conceded that "graphe" might be able to refer to Torah. But wait! Have you DEFINED "graphe" as "Torah" in this concession? Of course not.

Therefore, you have ALREADY DEMONSTRATED that you SHOULD understand the difference between "object" and "definition". Yet strangely, you continue to manifest the "object vs. definition" confusion when attempting to understand my position.

I can't simplify my position much more than this. If you fail to appreciate this point...well...then your philosophy of language (and foreign language skills, and logical thinking skills) are simply insufficient to understand my position.

And since you evidently can not even understand my position, then your failed criticism of it is, of course, to be rejected. A course in philosophy of language (and in foreign languages, and in logical/critical thinking) might be beneficial to you.

Please stop falsely accusing me of DEFINING “motsa” or “rhema” as Torah. I NEVER did any such thing….(that’s just in your confused faulty interpretation of my position).

And if you simply ENGAGED my 11-point argument, you would have learned this long ago! (but regrettably, you REFUSE to do so…)

For example: Which of my 11 premises DEFINES “motsa” as Torah? NONE!

And, which of my 11 premises DEFINES “rhema” as Torah? NONE!

Thus, you’re objection does NOT EVEN APPLY to my position. You can stop the “red herring” tactics please.

That’s WHY I constructed my argument in the 11 premises…to PREVENT you from CONTINUING to misrepresent and misunderstand my position….and to close down every last loophole that your faulty perceptions encourage you to seek.

Sadly, you REFUSE to tell us which specific premise you reject (or why). Thus, your REFUSAL to engage my position directly is the CHOICE you have made to conceal your failure to counter my position.

And if you continue to resist the truth of this point....well....then there's not much more I can do to empower you to even understand my position (let alone empower you to provide properly informed evaluation of it).

Have I used “completely subjective” interpretive methods here? Of course not. That’s just ANOTHER excuse which you (JGIG) wrongly use to avoid a PROPER response to my position.

Have I DEFINED “motsa” as Torah? Of course not. But that does NOT require that “motsa” can not refer to that which includes Torah, as I’ve now shown (YET AGAIN!)

Have I DEFINED “rhema” as Torah? Of course not. But that does NOT require that “rhema” can not refer to that which includes Torah.

After all…the Torah of Moses was SPOKEN by God….so of course it is entirely acceptable to view the written Torah of Moses as a written record of what God has SPOKEN (i.e., a written record of God’s RHEMA).

SO AGAIN: HERE IS THE ARGUMENT DISPROVING JGIG'S ANTI-TORAH THEOLOGY

1. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which comes forth from YHVH.
2. YHVH's commands come from YHVH.
3. YHVH's commands are contained in the written Torah of Moses (1 Ki. 2:3).
4. The written Torah of Moses comes from YHVH (from 2 and 3).
5. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 1 and 4).
6. The LXX uses "rhema" (in Greek, Dt. 8:3) to refer to that which comes from YHVH.
7. "Rhema" (Dt. 8:3, LXX) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 5 and 6).
8. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) is simply a citation of the Dt. 8:3 passage.
9. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 7 and 8).
10. Jesus said we LIVE by that "rhema" (Mt. 4:4).
11. Therefore, Jesus said we LIVE by that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 9 and 10).



CONCLUSION

1. It is our DUTY to test JGIG’s anti-Torah theology to see if it can be defended against criticism.

2. Testing JGIG’s position requires understanding WHICH PREMISES (in arguments that are critical of her view) that she rejects.

3. We can understand which premises she rejects ONLY IF JGIG tells us.

4. JGIG REPEATEDLY REFUSES to tell us which numbered premise she rejects.

5. JGIG REFUSES to tell us why she rejects any premise (in my 11-point argument) that she rejects.

6. JGIG, therefore, REFUSES to permit us to test her viewpoint against the criticism I’ve brought forth.

7. THEREFORE, JGIG’s viewpoint FAILS THE TEST!



You can’t pass a test that you REFUSE to take! JGIG agrees: “I won't fall for the bait…”

So there you have it…she WON’T “fall for the bait”. SHE REFUSES.

What is the “bait”? Simply a request to be able to TEST her view!!!

Simply a request to know WHICH premise she rejects, and then why she rejects it. But she won’t even tell us.

Now, she may raise another 50 objections to things I’ve written….but why should I engage?
I could develop more Biblical arguments which are carefully constructed, and Scripturally supported, and logically sound….only to discover more EXCUSES from JGIG explaining why she REFUSES to engage my position in detail again.

And look at ALL THE EXCUSES!

“I won’t fall for the bait”…

“already addressed at length…”

“the whole progression is to be ignored…”

“you didn’t read what I wrote…”

“could not accept that someone disagrees with you…”

“fire trucks are red…”

“how mind control is used…”

“manipulation to convince them…”

“other folks are more persuasive than you…”

“Bibleguy uses completely subjective interpretive methods”

“my mind is made up….so don’t confuse me with the facts!” (paraphrase…)

Yes, JGIG’s mind is ALREADY MADE UP! She hasn’t even seen the tiniest fraction of the full evidential support for my position…and she is evidently incapable of even properly understanding the position I’ve set forth thus far….

Yet JGIG is ALREADY CONVINCED that my position is wrong….before she has even reviewed the evidence for my position!

Remember? She wrote: “Here's the thing that you need to know: You're not going to convert me to Torah observance.”

Therefore: JGIG’s mind is ALREADY MADE UP….so it doesn’t matter WHAT ANYONE does or says….she has ALREADY closed her heart to even the possibility that she could be wrong.

Indeed….my suspicions regarding propagandist tendencies without regard for genuine dialogue (or regard for genuine pursuit of truth) now stand confirmed.

Wow….that’s VERY scary.

So she rambles on and on and on and on…

But WHERE oh WHERE oh WHERE does she tell us WHICH numbered premise she rejects?

Answer: She WON’T Tell us.

So what’s the real problem here?

She doesn’t lack evidence….she lacks the ability to subject herself to proper TESTING and critical evaluation.

And when she is finally cornered by an argument she can not answer in detail….then she simply REFUSES to answer, and pretends like everything is ok…..

This is a VERY unfortunate case in which a person simply refuses to follow the truth where it leads.

JGIG concludes: "Those 11 points are - AGAIN - a giant logical fallacy based on a false premise."

My response: And WHICH of the 11 premises is false?

Ah yes....you REFUSE to tell us.

And which of the 11 premises are not properly logically connected?

Ah yes...you REFUSE to tell us that too.


Instead, you construct a red herring, then falsely apply it to my position, and then you use that as an excuse to NOT permit us to TEST YOUR POSITION PROPERLY.

I fear this communication is about to break down....

I'm now doubting JGIG will ever step up to the plate, permitting us to test her position.

best…
BibleGuy
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
Dealing with modern day Judaizers "law-keepers" is like trying to pick up jello with your fingers...Paul had them following him after wards where ever he went and perverting the gospel of the grace of Christ

4199675334_66c3e3d61d_z[1].jpg
 
Last edited:
U

UnderGrace

Guest
This picture cracks me up ...... so apropos !!! :D
 
P

popeye

Guest
SO AGAIN: HERE IS THE ARGUMENT DISPROVING JGIG'S ANTI-TORAH THEOLOGY

1. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which comes forth from YHVH.
2. YHVH's commands come from YHVH.
3. YHVH's commands are contained in the written Torah of Moses (1 Ki. 2:3).
4. The written Torah of Moses comes from YHVH (from 2 and 3).
5. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 1 and 4).
6. The LXX uses "rhema" (in Greek, Dt. 8:3) to refer to that which comes from YHVH.
7. "Rhema" (Dt. 8:3, LXX) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 5 and 6).
8. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) is simply a citation of the Dt. 8:3 passage.
9. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 7 and 8).
10. Jesus said we LIVE by that "rhema" (Mt. 4:4).
11. Therefore, Jesus said we LIVE by that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 9 and 10).


CONCLUSION

1. It is our DUTY to test JGIG’s anti-Torah theology to see if it can be defended against criticism.
Conclusion;
You place Torah ABOVE the torah giver.
You think the NT has been replaced by the OT.
 
May 19, 2016
417
2
0
Conclusion;
You place Torah ABOVE the torah giver.
You think the NT has been replaced by the OT.
Not true. And you've given us NO evidence to support your false claims.

AND, you refuse to engage my 11-point argument.

So it is YOU who refuse to tell us which of the 11 premises is wrong.

And YOU refuse to tell us WHY you think a specific premise is wrong.

Instead, you falsely accuse me....claiming I place Torah above the Torah giver (which is ridiculous...I never did that).

And, you falsely accuse me again...claiming I think the NT has been replaced by the OT (again ridiculous...I never supported such a position).

Therefore, you FAIL to understand my position.

You FALSELY accuse me.

You REFUSE to tell us how your position disconfirms a specific premise in the 11-premise argument JGIG also is afraid to directly engage.

Therefore, we have good grounds to dismiss your position (along with JGIG's position).

Sigh.....I think I need to go somewhere else....

These conversations RAPIDLY degrade to disputes which quickly expose the failure of my critics to even understand my position.

BibleGuy
 
May 19, 2016
417
2
0

*sigh* Will they never understand?


SIGH......will they never engage my 11-point Scripturally-grounded argument which refutes them?



1. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which comes forth from YHVH.
2. YHVH's commands come from YHVH.
3. YHVH's commands are contained in the written Torah of Moses (1 Ki. 2:3).
4. The written Torah of Moses comes from YHVH (from 2 and 3).
5. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 1 and 4).
6. The LXX uses "rhema" (in Greek, Dt. 8:3) to refer to that which comes from YHVH.
7. "Rhema" (Dt. 8:3, LXX) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 5 and 6).
8. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) is simply a citation of the Dt. 8:3 passage.
9. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 7 and 8).
10. Jesus said we LIVE by that "rhema" (Mt. 4:4).
11. Therefore, Jesus said we LIVE by that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 9 and 10).


 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0

SIGH......will they never engage my 11-point Scripturally-grounded argument which refutes them?



1. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which comes forth from YHVH.
2. YHVH's commands come from YHVH.
3. YHVH's commands are contained in the written Torah of Moses (1 Ki. 2:3).
4. The written Torah of Moses comes from YHVH (from 2 and 3).
5. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 1 and 4).
6. The LXX uses "rhema" (in Greek, Dt. 8:3) to refer to that which comes from YHVH.
7. "Rhema" (Dt. 8:3, LXX) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 5 and 6).
8. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) is simply a citation of the Dt. 8:3 passage.
9. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 7 and 8).
10. Jesus said we LIVE by that "rhema" (Mt. 4:4).
11. Therefore, Jesus said we LIVE by that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 9 and 10).



This has already been addressed 2x times by JGIG. She has a history and a website dedicated to showing the falsehoods of the "law-keepers" - Hebrew Roots Movement.

Here are the links for people viewing to see why this is a complete fallacy put forth by Bibleguy. I know it will do nothing for you as you are stuck in your religion but it will help those that are open to the Holy Spirit.

Here is her original response to your post:

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/137844-dear-bibleguy-3.html#post2670720


Here is her response to you after you still refused to see the truth.

http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/137844-dear-bibleguy-4.html#post2672739

You are free to stay in your religion but it is not of Christ. There is a New Covenant build upon better promises of which Jesus' blood speaks of better things. There has been a change of priesthood.
 
P

popeye

Guest
Not true. And you've given us NO evidence to support your false claims.

AND, you refuse to engage my 11-point argument.

So it is YOU who refuse to tell us which of the 11 premises is wrong.

And YOU refuse to tell us WHY you think a specific premise is wrong.

Instead, you falsely accuse me....claiming I place Torah above the Torah giver (which is ridiculous...I never did that).

And, you falsely accuse me again...claiming I think the NT has been replaced by the OT (again ridiculous...I never supported such a position).

Therefore, you FAIL to understand my position.

You FALSELY accuse me.

You REFUSE to tell us how your position disconfirms a specific premise in the 11-premise argument JGIG also is afraid to directly engage.

Therefore, we have good grounds to dismiss your position (along with JGIG's position).

Sigh.....I think I need to go somewhere else....

These conversations RAPIDLY degrade to disputes which quickly expose the failure of my critics to even understand my position.

BibleGuy
Who added to the law?

Sins of omission
Sins of the thought life

Who added those to the torah?
 
P

popeye

Guest

SIGH......will they never engage my 11-point Scripturally-grounded argument which refutes them?



1. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which comes forth from YHVH.
2. YHVH's commands come from YHVH.
3. YHVH's commands are contained in the written Torah of Moses (1 Ki. 2:3).
4. The written Torah of Moses comes from YHVH (from 2 and 3).
5. Dt. 8:3 refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 1 and 4).
6. The LXX uses "rhema" (in Greek, Dt. 8:3) to refer to that which comes from YHVH.
7. "Rhema" (Dt. 8:3, LXX) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 5 and 6).
8. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) is simply a citation of the Dt. 8:3 passage.
9. "Rhema" (Mt. 4:4) refers to that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 7 and 8).
10. Jesus said we LIVE by that "rhema" (Mt. 4:4).
11. Therefore, Jesus said we LIVE by that which INCLUDES the written Torah of Moses (from 9 and 10).


Correction, when we do ,you go to circular default.

The REASON I say you put torah above the torah giver is BECAUSE that is your core foundation.

You magnify the torah. Period. That is what you do.