This is not my logic... whatsoever. I would challenge you to reply to any post I've made where I object to making it illegal for a person to "hang out in the women's room waiting for the opportunity".
My logic is this law doesn't put women at risk anymore than allowing private citizens to own guns puts people at risk of being murdered by criminals. Just as a criminal will still get his hands on guns, a criminal will still find a way to violate a woman. Furthermore, if we want to "protect women" shouldn't we protect young boys from perverted pedophiles that want to record them too? Hence, I made an 8 restroom proposal with age restrictions.
If we make it illegal for a person who identifies as the opposite gender they were born as, wouldn't we have to enforce this law? If your answer is "No, we don't have to enforce this law." then are we really going to stop anyone from violating women? lol If your answer is "Yes, we should prosecute anyone that goes to the opposite gendered restroom they were born with" then I guess we are suppose to hire restroom attendants who check everyone's genitals...?