J
jennymae
Guest
Who are you to say that a Pepsi can identifies itself as a coke can?![]()
Can as in can or can as in can?
Who are you to say that a Pepsi can identifies itself as a coke can?![]()
Depends.. Can a can do such thing? Or can the can can that stigma out the way?
As usual you interject to complain or voice your displeasure about how a thread is going, but you do not actually contribute.You know, this post might mean a lot more if you had actually once posted the Bible about it. So what is it called when people mouth and saying something is not in the Bible, but they do not post correctly what they are debating against, and certainly never post a Scripture to support what you are saying? Maybe hypocrisy? Just guessing, you understand!
how to use an old adage you know what happens when you assume? I actually like some of the stuff I've read from RC Sproule but that doesn't mean that everything he writes is an alignment with the Bible. I feel the same way about Spurgeon, great man of God but his commitment to RT in my opinion lessens his impact.Whether Calvinism is formed from eisegesis or exegesis won't be apparent until you start supporting your views. As I said, knew of the most Biblically based books I have read is "What is Reformed Theology?" By RC Sproule.
That's my whole point about being a 1 to 5 point Calvinist, but in regard to the infant baptism thing, that something that people discover on their own and it's usually not taught when the Tulip Doctrine is, for obvious reasons.I could never be a full Calvinist simply because of the whole infant baptism issue. I've been a Pentecostal and Baptist my whole Christian walk, and after 36 years, I am not going to change that. Also the Bible doesn't support it, except in the vaguest way, in Acts 16.
Which is what Paul teaches us in Ephesians 4:11-16.I'm still eclectic in my theology, but certainly, reading different theologians and then looking the Scriptures up in context has given me a lot to chew on.
I look forward to addressing them, but please do take your time as you know the old saying, 'haste makes waste'.I'm going to try and post some corrections on the misconceptions about Calvinism which I know I certainly had. However, I still have to wrap presents and do a lot more Christmas stuff, before we leave. So, no idea when I will do this.
That's the best goal one can have.But, since I do understand hermeneutics quite well, I will assure you I will only do exegetics. I have no iron in this fire, except hoping people will understand each other better, and, oh yes, loving one another as Christ loved the church!
That awkward moment when you don't even know what Calvinism is...
Sooo, you're the wise man in your own eyes?![]()
i'd just like to put that the meme in question should correctly be interpreted as a "post" not a "stick"
yours,
- post -
View attachment 163683
Well this is the 5 Point declarations of calvinism they are called Tulip..
T,U,L,I,P
"T" in "TULIP" stands for "Total Hereditary Depravity."
"Because of the fall, man is unable of himself to savingly believe the gospel. The sinner is dead, blind, and deaf to the things of God; his heart is deceitful and desperately corrupt. His will is not free, it is in bondage to his evil nature, therefore, he will not - indeed he cannot - choose good over evil in the spiritual realm. Consequently, it takes much more than the Spirit's assistance to bring a sinner to Christ - it takes regeneration by which the Spirit makes the sinner alive and gives him a new nature. Faith is not something man contributes to salvation but is itself a part of God's gift of salvation - it is God's gift to the sinner, not the sinner's gift to God."
"U" in "TULIP" stands for "Unconditional Election" (Predestination).
"God's choice of certain individuals unto salvation before the foundation of the world rested solely in His own sovereign will. His choice of particular sinners was not based on any foreseen response of obedience on their part, such as faith, repentance, etc. On the contrary, God gives faith and repentance to each individual whom He selects. These acts are the result, not the cause of God's choice. Election therefore was not determined by or conditioned upon any virtuous quality or act foreseen in man. Those whom God sovereignly elected He brings through the power of the Spirit to a willing acceptance of Christ. Thus God's choice of the sinner, not the sinner's choice of Christ, is the ultimate cause of salvation."
"L" in "TULIP" stands for "Limited Atonement."
"Christ's redeeming work was intended to save the elect only and actually secured salvation for them. His death was substitutionary endurance of the penalty of sin in the place of certain specified sinners. In addition to putting away the sins of His people, Christ's redemption secured everything necessary for their salvation, including faith which unites them to Him. The gift of faith is infallibly applied by the Spirit to all for whom Christ died, therefore guaranteeing their salvation."
"I" in "TULIP" stands for "Irresistible Grace."
"In addition to the outward general call to salvation which is made to everyone who hears the gospel, the Holy Spirit extends to the elect a special inward call that inevitably brings them to salvation. The internal call (which is made only to the elect) cannot be rejected; it always results in conversion. By means of this special call the Spirit irresistibly draws sinners to Christ. He is not limited in His work of applying salvation by man's will, nor is he dependant upon man's cooperation for success. The Spirit graciously causes the elect sinner to cooperate, to believe, to repent, to come freely and willingly to Christ. God's grace, therefore, is invincible; it never fails to result in the salvation of those to whom it is extended."
"P" in "TULIP" stands for "Perseverance of the Saints."
All who are chosen by God, redeemed by Christ, and given faith by the Spirit are eternally saved. They are kept in faith by the power of the almighty God and thus preserved to the end."
So now you know what calvinisim is..
When simple subject-oriented questions are called inane, it's not thick. It's arrogance. You won't explain yourself and you won't let others counter in a civil way, or ANY way, but now you've posted a couple of excuses, including, "I am baffled." And that is being generous considering your title for this little game of yours.You asked me does God predestine?
A:yes (foreordain / predestine)
By what right?
I didn't really understand this question, but I answered his right to do what he wants.
Then you asked me if he deserved the right to do what he wants....
I am genuinely baffled by this question. Am I being thick?
And now you need to read my other answers. This time I answered before you asked. lolEverything is predestined in terms of what's in the Bible and what's here on Earth. God knew the past, knows the present, and knows the future. That doesn't mean we stop ministering to others, though. Jesus instructs us to make disciples of the nation's. God doesn't create someone just to send them straight to hell after. People end up in hell, yes. But that's of their own doing. Their free will got them in that situation. If Calvinism was real, then that contradicts free will. And we know we have free will.
It's a branch!So... you saw a meme of a stick, saying "people will argue about anything on the internet"?
- Is it your contention that people actually WOULD argue about a stick?
- Would you maintain that a stick has no properties valuable enough to induce argumentation?
- Lets just get to the bottom of this; are you FOR the stick, or AGAINST it?
: )
TRANSLATION:When simple subject-oriented questions are called inane, it's not thick. It's arrogance. You won't explain yourself and you won't let others counter in a civil way, or ANY way, but now you've posted a couple of excuses, including, "I am baffled." And that is being generous considering your title for this little game of yours.
On a grading scale of 1-10, with ten being extremely credible, I'd give you a .5.
I've been studying the Bible since you were three. It was settled longer ago than that, but you wouldn't know because you buy whatever anyone tells you.Maybe this is why you're Depleted.
Can you just read God's Word and apply it? Mysteries and all. It's not a difficult issue if you keep it in context with the pictures and teachings in the word. The two doctrines that are being debatedare just intellectual fodder. The word doesn't teach either. Those are just two men's opinion on what is explained in the bible.
I realize it makes for nice long threads here that have no solution or end point, but that's not the Lord's will. He wants us to hear and understand the word of the Lord. Indicating that one can, which disqualifies thistopic. Since it's never settled, nor is it illustratedin the OT.
i'd just like to put that the meme in question should correctly be interpreted as a "post" not a "stick"
yours,
- post -
View attachment 163683
Ok, I understand now.
Yeah, from the verse in Romans, its quite clear that the predestined will be called and will accept. So, you can call it "irresistible", I think.
And it is what the 4th point of calvinism says. That those who are predestined to be saved, will accept.
It does not say, though, anything about those who are not predestined to be saved. They can resist the call or accept it for a while and then will fall away.
Hm?
Rom 1Romans 1 really does say that nature itself screams "GOD!" And that does leave us with no excuse. Still, doesn't work for us. We're that thick/stupid/dead. If you keep reading Romans all the way up to 8, it is one defense we might make after the next after the next, until every excuse is used up. And still we will not! And then 8-9 (chapters, not verses) goes on to what God did/does/will do.
And, again, you're right, he did for whosoever-will-believe, but whosoever-wills never believed until God steps in.
Why is that important to me? I know if left to my own devices, I'd still be hating God. And if it is my strength to choose, my strength to hang on, my strength to effect my salvation? I'm doomed! I don't have that kind of strength. I'm that stupid. And that dead!
God gave us a super-duper, can't-get-any-better-than-this gift! I can't help but tell others in hopes he gives them the same gift. I've been trying to get my blood family in on this gift for 44 years now. They don't get it. I haven't given up, but part of the reason is because hubby did the same with his family. His brother and stepdad (the only man he knew as "Dad") were dying at the same time (for different reasons.) His brother was saved two weeks before he died. His dad was not. We don't know the list of who God saves, but I keep praying he saves all my family. It's such a super gift we don't deserve. And they refuse it, but that doesn't stop God from dinking his light on us anyway. (Dinking -- the sound of a light switch being flicked. lol)
Lots of people think Calvinists are fatalists. I'm not. I'm an optimist because God saved me, and I don't deserve it, even according to my choice. I'm not worth it, and yet he declared me worthy through his Son. In my mind, everyone is more worth-it than I am. When handed such a perfect gift, the only response is to let everyone else know where this great deal is to pass on our good fortune.
Two differences.
1. All people deserve the bottom of the ocean and dead.
2. God is pure love, but he is also pure just, and he has the best handle of wrathful I've ever seen. Like I wouldn't judge you by just your height, don't judge God by just his love
The labels are already there but if somebody doesn't want to be labeled them the best thing they can do is deny the label.
If someone acquiesce is to a label and then obviously it represents what they are.
It's not a matter of standing in what we believe it's a matter of standing on the truth of what God's word says and should always be.