If Hebrew Torah scrolls were expensive in the first century, that is not evidence that the word 'prophesy' in the New Testament means something radically different from what it meant for Moses, Isaiah, or Jeremiah to prophesy.
If Hebrew Torah scrolls were expensive and rare in the first century, that does not have anything to do with the interpretation of I Corinthians 13 that some cessationists hold to (but not others) which makes their understanding out to be far greater than the apostle Paul's.
But here is a comment from Alfred Edersheim's book on the price of Torah scrolls in the era in question.
From The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah: Volume I
by Alfred Edersheim
http://www.briarchasechurch.org/V6A-E/EDR_LTJ1.PDF
If Hebrew Torah scrolls were expensive and rare in the first century, that does not have anything to do with the interpretation of I Corinthians 13 that some cessationists hold to (but not others) which makes their understanding out to be far greater than the apostle Paul's.
But here is a comment from Alfred Edersheim's book on the price of Torah scrolls in the era in question.
From the extreme labour and care bestowed on them, Hebrew manuscripts
of the Bible were enormously dear, as we infer from a curious Talmudical
notice, {Gitt. 35 last line and b.} where a common wollen wrap, which of
course was very cheap, a copy of the Psalms, of Job, and torn pieces from
Proverbs, are together valued at five maneh, say, about 19l. Although this
notice dates from the third or fourth century, it is not likely that the cost of
Hebrew Biblical MSS. was much lower at the time of Jesus. This would, of
course, put their possession well nigh out of common reach. On the other
hand, we are able to form an idea of the cheapness of Greek manuscripts
from what we know of the price of books in Rome at the beginning of our
era. Hundreds of slaves were there engaged copying what one dictated.
The result was not only the publication of as large editions as in our days,
but their production at only about double the cost of what are now known
as ‘cheap’ or ‘people’s editions.’ Probably it would be safe to compute,
that as much matter as would cover sixteen pages of small print might, in
such cases, be sold at the rate of about sixpence, and in that ratio.
Accordingly, manuscripts in Greek or Latin, although often incorrect, must
have been easily attainable, and this would have considerable influence on
making the Greek version of the Old Testament the ‘people’s Bible.’
of the Bible were enormously dear, as we infer from a curious Talmudical
notice, {Gitt. 35 last line and b.} where a common wollen wrap, which of
course was very cheap, a copy of the Psalms, of Job, and torn pieces from
Proverbs, are together valued at five maneh, say, about 19l. Although this
notice dates from the third or fourth century, it is not likely that the cost of
Hebrew Biblical MSS. was much lower at the time of Jesus. This would, of
course, put their possession well nigh out of common reach. On the other
hand, we are able to form an idea of the cheapness of Greek manuscripts
from what we know of the price of books in Rome at the beginning of our
era. Hundreds of slaves were there engaged copying what one dictated.
The result was not only the publication of as large editions as in our days,
but their production at only about double the cost of what are now known
as ‘cheap’ or ‘people’s editions.’ Probably it would be safe to compute,
that as much matter as would cover sixteen pages of small print might, in
such cases, be sold at the rate of about sixpence, and in that ratio.
Accordingly, manuscripts in Greek or Latin, although often incorrect, must
have been easily attainable, and this would have considerable influence on
making the Greek version of the Old Testament the ‘people’s Bible.’
by Alfred Edersheim
http://www.briarchasechurch.org/V6A-E/EDR_LTJ1.PDF