Who were the two witnesses in your opinion?
The twofold witness portrays the witness of the church, the new Temple of God, in this present age, possibly at some stage, being personified by 2 outstanding individuals.
Who were the two witnesses in your opinion?
The twofold witness portrays the witness of the church, the new Temple of God, in this present age, possibly at some stage, being personified by 2 outstanding individuals.
Who were the two witnesses in your opinion?
If I had to label myself, I'd be a partial preterist amillennialist which leads me back to my premise, that being I believe there are two distinct and separate events, the Great Tribulation of Israel (AD 66-70) and a future return of Christ (Second Coming). The key is "rightly dividing" which passages go with which event. Who thinks as I do?[/SIZE]
I would think so my self,I was considering also the things you were noting in post #249 about Leviticus and Deuteronomy and the plagues and consequences of what you had said. The conclusion would be that if it were never an land or physical kingdom being denoted and it was always speaking of one of a spiritual nature then in Deuteronomy 32:51-52 it would mean that Moses would never enter the spiritual kingdom.
There is not enough information in John's revelation to identify who they were.
Also rightly accepting various verses such as:
Rom 13:12 The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light.
Phil 4:5 Let your moderation be known unto all men. The Lord is at hand.
1 Pet 4:7 But the end of all things is at hand: be ye therefore sober, and watch unto prayer.
Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
Rev 1:3 Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written therein: for the time is at hand.
Rev 22:10 And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand.
Heb 10:37 For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry.
So all of the above statements have little sense of imminence to you, would I be correct?
How do you explain these statements if they are not applicable to the time in which they were written.
Locutus,
We are close in our thinking. Let's say that all of Mat 24 has been fulfilled and that the Wrath of the Lamb was poured out back in 70 AD. There are many verses which point to this besides those you cite.
So, in your understanding, what's next? How and when do things conclude on this planet?
The disciples did not ask about the "end of the world" - this is an unfortunate and wrong rendition in the KJV:
Mat 24:3 And as he sat upon the mount of Olives, the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be? and what shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?
The Greek word aion which means "age" it is not "world":
Mat 24:3 (Young's Literal) And when he is sitting on the mount of the Olives, the disciples came near to him by himself, saying, 'Tell us, when shall these be? and what is the sign of thy presence, and of the full end of the age?'
Locutus, So, let's assume for sake of argument this has all be fulfilled, again, what's next??
Totally agree!!
So what about the harvest of Mat 13?
lol,it's just like reading the letters of the second century speaking of the very same events things are always narrowed down to this and this paragraph is fulfilled but this paragraph and this one is future. That's why no one likes the letters from the second century Church first Barnabas says something that seems preterite and then in the very next paragraph he speaks as a dispensationist. In A.H. book 5,chapters 25-onward Irenaeus is a Dispensationist but if you read from book one to the end of book 5 he said some things as if they are fulfilled. So who would want to use them as support for their theology as quick as you quote them in one place the other camp will quote from another.
The issue I see is that the dispensational camp regularly directly contradict plain statements in the bible - I've rarely seen any in the preterist "camp" do that.
Jesus - "John the B is Elijah."
Dispensationlist - "he's not."
Let's get real here.
lol,I enjoy the answers they come up with when I ask them about the mark there's no end to what they’ll say. It's something I learned to expect that they would just come up with any answer. The preterist are completely different when I ask them about the mark they most time change the subject,ignore it but if they try to answer it it's like watching them walk past a fun-house mirror. I was in a think tank type email group a few years ago where we discussed the very issue and we came up with 20-30 questions to ask.lol,but no ones ever got past the first so I don’t see any reason to complicate it any further.
I explain it this way:Rev 1:1 The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to show unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass; and he sent and signified it by his angel unto his servant John:
.
.
.
How do you explain these statements if they are not applicable to the time in which they were written.
And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done. ~ Revelation 22:6
Behold, I come quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book. ~ Revelation 22:7
And he saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book: for the time is at hand. ~ Revelation 22:10
And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. ~ Revelation 22:12
He which testifieth these things saith, Surely I come quickly. Amen. Even so, come, Lord Jesus. ~ Revelation 22:20
O.K. - let me see if I have this...
'shortly' means "shortly"...
'quickly' means "quickly"...
Everything in Revelation is past...
Jesus has already returned...
Babylon has fallen...
The Wrath of God has been poured out onto the earth...
The Great White Throne Judgment Day is over...
The rewards have all been passed out...
Hell has been cast into the lake of fire...
We are now living in the new heaven and new earth...
New Jerusalem has come down from heaven...
There is no more sun or moon...
The Lamb has married His wife...
![]()
![]()
Consider:
Strong's G1096 for "come to pass" in Revelation 1:1
1) to become, i.e. to come into existence, begin to be, receive being
2) to become, i.e. to come to pass, happen a) of events
3) to arise, appear in history, come upon the stage a) of men appearing in public
4) to be made, finished a) of miracles, to be performed, wrought
5) to become, be made
When I cannot find a specific definition tied to a particular usage - I generally use the first one, which is usually the most common usage. And, since most of these definitions carry with it the idea of "beginning and continuing" anyway -- I am going to suggest that the true "sense and tense" of the phrase 'Must Shortly Come To Pass' actually means "Must Shortly Begin To Come To Pass"...
And - yes - the phrase "shortly come to pass" in Revelation 1:1 and the phrase "shortly be done" in Revelation 22:6 are the same in the Greek.
"Something to think about..."
![]()