The Drums of War
- Thread starter Sirk
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E
well good thing Obama is gone.. He appeased people. while they armed up to be able to attack us.
I doubt Trump will let it go on too long.. Give him time.. and oh, If fat boy uses nukes, all bets are off..
Also. I doubt trump will make the same mistake the president in the first war made.. When he had the whole red chinese army ripe for the taking, instead let them go, and why we lost the war.. Trump will tell the generals. do whatever it takes.. (at least we can all hope)
I doubt Trump will let it go on too long.. Give him time.. and oh, If fat boy uses nukes, all bets are off..
Also. I doubt trump will make the same mistake the president in the first war made.. When he had the whole red chinese army ripe for the taking, instead let them go, and why we lost the war.. Trump will tell the generals. do whatever it takes.. (at least we can all hope)
Lol. I have some friends who are police officers. One of them in particular who is the guy that does all the background checks on potential new hires keeps in contact with me thru text quite a bit. Every time he texts me I wonder how his reports hold up in court because his grammar and sentence structure is so bad. Lol
-> The plural form of logic is logic.
-> There are some instances, when speaking collectively of entirely different branches of logic, where it might be acceptable to refer to these as "logics."
-> But logic is always inherently plural when speaking of a collective of logical statements.
The above was just for the sake of "fun facts."
I don't much care about grammar errors in a public forum; I make plenty myself.
I don't know why you keep telling me I'm mad
I'm just poking some holes in your logics. Now, this might be a bit difficult for you to get, but I do fully agree with you that logics is important in every aspect of life. Your logically built up list makes sense almost all the way to the Pacific.
I'm sure though, that you, after reading what I've written so far, are getting somehow suspicious, why does this old lady keep on rambling like this, yesterday you told her that logics was this and that, and to you she came across an illogical, and somewhat angry woman, which you, pointed out, is the common reaction from ladies when it comes to you.
Now, what I was saying about logics, which you clearly failed to comprehend, is that what is considered logics to you, not necessarily is logics to somebody else. This becames even clearer in times of war. Have you been in a war zone, Maxwel? Didn't think so. In a war zone there are times that your well educated logics is good for nothing. You told me that making threats was little to lose, much to gain, and war was little to gain and much to lose, if I recall correctly? But that kinda logics doesn't apply to everyone. To some, it will, during a build up or even during a war, change to a situation where war is the only logical solution, even how stupid it looks to everyone else.
You can bring on all your logics, but the enemy isn't acting anywhere near what you, or me, believe is logics. Hell, they are breaking every rule in the "How a Normal Brain is Running"-book lol. What do you think would happen if a perfectly logical logistics (I can assure you that there is no such thing as a logical logistics officer haha) officer failed to take into consideration the illogical aspects in a crisis, his or hers gut feeling, or what, it really comes down to, he let logics lead him to failure? lol. Not much likely, eh, and you're right, it is highly unlikely, but still this is happening more often than not.
What about a hostage situation? I could go on and on, but by the end of the day, I would agree with you 95 out of 100 times, but those darn five times carries some significance too.
And I'm not mad at you at all. In fact you're one of my favorites on here.
I'm just poking some holes in your logics. Now, this might be a bit difficult for you to get, but I do fully agree with you that logics is important in every aspect of life. Your logically built up list makes sense almost all the way to the Pacific.I'm sure though, that you, after reading what I've written so far, are getting somehow suspicious, why does this old lady keep on rambling like this, yesterday you told her that logics was this and that, and to you she came across an illogical, and somewhat angry woman, which you, pointed out, is the common reaction from ladies when it comes to you
.Now, what I was saying about logics, which you clearly failed to comprehend, is that what is considered logics to you, not necessarily is logics to somebody else. This becames even clearer in times of war. Have you been in a war zone, Maxwel? Didn't think so. In a war zone there are times that your well educated logics is good for nothing. You told me that making threats was little to lose, much to gain, and war was little to gain and much to lose, if I recall correctly? But that kinda logics doesn't apply to everyone. To some, it will, during a build up or even during a war, change to a situation where war is the only logical solution, even how stupid it looks to everyone else.
You can bring on all your logics, but the enemy isn't acting anywhere near what you, or me, believe is logics. Hell, they are breaking every rule in the "How a Normal Brain is Running"-book lol. What do you think would happen if a perfectly logical logistics (I can assure you that there is no such thing as a logical logistics officer haha) officer failed to take into consideration the illogical aspects in a crisis, his or hers gut feeling, or what, it really comes down to, he let logics lead him to failure? lol. Not much likely, eh, and you're right, it is highly unlikely, but still this is happening more often than not.
What about a hostage situation? I could go on and on, but by the end of the day, I would agree with you 95 out of 100 times, but those darn five times carries some significance too
.And I'm not mad at you at all. In fact you're one of my favorites on here
.
1. "Have you been in a war zone, Maxwel? Didn't think so."
Yes, yes I have.
Thank you for asking me a question and then answering for me.
Well done.
Maybe you shouldn't jump to conclusions about people you don't actually know.
For the record, making assumptions without actually having any facts - that's another good example of how you REFUSE to use logical processes... and thus come up with wrong answers.
2."I don't know why you keep telling me I'm mad. I'm just poking some holes in your logics"
No... I don't think you are.
- You can't poke holes in my logic when you don't understand what logic actually is.
- You're aiming at my logic, but you don't know what logic is... so you're aiming at something you cannot possibly hit.
- You shouldn't debate terms you don't understand... it's like shooting at things you can't see.
3. Overall Susanna, you are making a continual error of EQUIVOCATION.
You are equating the word "logic" with the concept of "planning" and with the concept of "assessment."
These things are not the same.
A. Logic is used in planning... but logic is not planning.
* when the plan fails, you don't cease to use logic.
* You continue to use logic when you create a counter plan, or when you use any emergency measures.
B. Logic is used in assessment... but logic is not assessment.
* When the assessment fails, you don't cease to use logic.
* You continue to use logic when you create a new assessment, or an emergency plan, or use some contingency.
4. If you would simply change your terms, and instead of finding a failure with "logic", you would find a failure with "planning" or "assessment"... then we would be closer to agreement.
However, as long as you want to attack the concept of logic, you must, by definition, necessarily lose.
The concept of logic is not something which is, or ever can be, up for debate.
As soon as you question the concept of logic, you necessarily lose, as it requires logic just to question.
Instead of using the word "logic" in place of the words you probably mean, you should just adjust your terms, and use words more suited to what you actually mean.
I'm fine with that.
I'm happy to let you change your terms.
Last edited:
S
1. "Have you been in a war zone, Maxwel? Didn't think so."
Yes, yes I have.
Thank you for asking me a question and then answering for me.
Well done.
Maybe you shouldn't jump to conclusions about people you don't actually know.
For the record, making assumptions without actually having any facts - that's another good example of how you REFUSE to use logical processes... and thus come up with wrong answers.
2. "I don't know why you keep telling me I'm mad. I'm just poking some holes in your logics"
No... I don't think you are.
- You can't poke holes in my logic when you don't understand what logic actually is.
- You're aiming at my logic, but you don't know what logic is... so you're aiming at something you cannot possibly hit.
3. Overall Susanna, you are making a continual error of EQUIVOCATION.
You are equating the word "logic" with the concept of "planning" and with the concept of "assessment."
These things are not the same.
A. Logic is used in planning... but logic is not planning.
* when the plan fails, you don't cease to use logic.
* You continue to use logic when you create a counter plan, or when you use any emergency measures.
B. Logic is used in assessment... but logic is not assessment.
* When the assessment fails, you don't cease to use logic.
* You continue to use logic when you create a new assessment, or an emergency plan, or use some contingency.
4. If you would simply change your terms, and instead of finding a failure with "logic", you would find a failure with "planning" or "assessment"... then we would be closer to agreement.
However, as long as you want to attack the concept of logic, you must, by definition, necessarily lose.
The concept of logic is not something which is, or ever can be, up for debate.
As soon as you question the concept of logic, you necessarily lose, as it requires logic just to question.
Instead of using the word "logic" in place of the words you probably mean, you should just adjust your terms, and use words more suited to what you actually mean.
I'm fine with that.
I'm happy to let you change your terms.
.
