Methinks this thread has gotten completely off topic. May I suggest that one of you start a new thread to discuss the tongues issue, or at least drop discussing it here.![]()
I left one to come here, and here we go again, and again, and again, and again.
Methinks this thread has gotten completely off topic. May I suggest that one of you start a new thread to discuss the tongues issue, or at least drop discussing it here.![]()
No one seeks speaking in tongues, it's just like salvation, you believe and you receive. Whatever you and your wife did you did wrong period but I'm not surprised because you keep on coming up with the wrong conclusions on this thread. If you don't accept what the Bible said and what Paul said and what Peter said about the Holy Spirit then that's your problem and you ought to ask God why you can't believe. You obviously can't have the Holy Spirit in you if you've never receive the baptism of the holy spirit so I'm afraid the voice you were listening to was definitely not of God. Remember who appears as an angel of Light.No, My wife, (whom I was married to for 36 years before she passed away), spoke in charismatic tongues for years, before I met her and while doing her own serious Bible Study on the subject shortly after we were married, she discovered it was all a counterfeit. I was seeking to speak in tongues at that time and wanted to prove her wrong, so I began a serious Bible Study on the subject. Two weeks into that study, I came to the biblical conclusion, that she was right, it really was all a pure counterfeit. SO I did 5.5 more months of INTENSE study on that one subject, and found WAY MORE evidence for a Non-Charismatic point of view than I ever did for a Charismatic Point of view. After all the books, sermon tapes, and personal interviews were done, I sat down and wrote a Summary of want I had learned throughout that intense study, and by the time I re-typed it to save as a Word Doc for my Computer, it turned out to be a 12 page, #10 Times New Roman font, Summary. Believe me, I could have written an an extensive 300 page book on the subject, but the Holy Spirit in me told me, after page 12, that if they will not hear the truth in those 12 pages, adding 288 more pages would be equally ignored. Even my Pastor as well as several others, agreed it was one of the best explanations of The Gift of Tongues - A non-charismatic understanding that they had ever read.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOFH5gykeJk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQrBtPQUVxc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFKnsFwTrOI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8jcGXRJu5Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9d5lDeMJjx4
Believe in whatever experience you want, but we will continue to believe what the Word of God actually says, and what the Holy Spirit has led us to understand.
Well then maybe you should stop bringing it up? Apparently you've got a real problem with Pentecostals?I left one to come here, and here we go again, and again, and again, and again.
Like I said, I have been down this path with numerous others ever since the early 80's; and I can produce hand written Bibles Studies to prove it. AND I FIND NOTHING NEW UNDER THE SUN. What has been said, will be said again, and again, and again, and again. Absolutely NOTHING new under the sun. You certainly do not see desperation in me, just someone who is sick and tired of nearly every Pentecostal and Charismatic wanting to argue this issue.
And the more the Kundalini Awakening spreads throughout the Charismatic Movement, the more they want to argue about it. That just adds to the proof that Toronto Blessing was and is purely of the Devil.
Good Post!!Here is an online resource with articles on 1 Timothy, I Do Not Permit… | The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW) etc, by noted, evangelical, New Testament Scholars and others 50 Crucial Questions | The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW)
Here is an online resource with articles on 1 Timothy, I Do Not Permit… | The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW) etc, by noted, evangelical, New Testament Scholars and others 50 Crucial Questions | The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW)
The CBMW has always been against inclusive and egalitarian language in the Bible even when it is clearly evident in the scripture. Wayne Grudem is one of the founders of this group and is a notorious complimentarianism who was the General Editor of the ESV Study Bible which never translates the Greek Word ἀδελφός (adelphos) as anything but 'brother', even though it is properly translated as 'brethren' or 'brother' & sister'. The Greek word connotes a member of the Christian Community in the New Testament, not just a male member.
As far as I can see, a woman can teach anyone anytime.Just was wondering, can a woman over see and teach a women's and children's ministry, according to scriptures ?
As far as I can see, a woman can teach anyone anytime.
Sorry, but I'm not a really big proponent of hypothetical situations. The Bible deals with real time issues. There is no doubt many men are hard headed but that is the human condition and applies to women as well. Thankfully hard headedness is not unforgivable.Let's assume they could not teach men but they can teach women and children and if there 500 that attends a church and 300 are women and children, where is a woman going to teach such a large group, to the men, is a woman going to teach such a large group out behind the barn, where no men are allow to attend ? I think men are just hard core or hard headed.
Sorry, but I'm not a really big proponent of hypothetical situations. The Bible deals with real time issues. There is no doubt many men are hard headed but that is the human condition and applies to women as well. Thankfully hard headedness is not unforgivable.
By oldhermit
But as the church is subject to Christ, so also the [/I]wives ought to be to their husbands in everything.”(And this is an unqualified statement that offers NO exceptions.)
/I][/COLOR]
By oldhermit
Man represents God and woman represents the Church. [/I]
3.) If we want to talk about Biblical symbolism, BOTH man and woman represent God. BOTH man and woman represent the church (bride of Christ). It's not either or; it's both.
The CBMW has always been against inclusive and egalitarian language in the Bible even when it is clearly evident in the scripture. Wayne Grudem is one of the founders of this group and is a notorious complimentarianism who was the General Editor of the ESV Study Bible which never translates the Greek Word ἀδελφός (adelphos) as anything but 'brother', even though it is properly translated as 'brethren' or 'brother' & sister'. The Greek word connotes a member of the Christian Community in the New Testament, not just a male member.
I understand far more than you will ever.No, you have to twist meanings, and trivialize or flat ignore clear COMMANDS from GOD to see it that way.
The church is not the bride of Christ it is the body of Christ. The bride of Christ is the New Jerusalem.
The bride of Christ is the New Jerusalem,and all that is within,including the saints.
Rev 22:17 And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.
The Spirit,and the bride,saints,say,Come,partake of the kingdom of God.
The church is not the bride of Christ it is the body of Christ. The bride of Christ is the New Jerusalem.