U.S. Just Attacked Syria

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Assad never once gassed his own people; Jesus would never use his sword against Assad or direct anyone else to use violence against Assad.
UMMM.....man does this post miss the mark.....more cake takers.....wow.....

Who raised up the Assyrians to judge Israel
Who raised up the Babylonians to judge Assyria and the Judah
Why does Jesus blaze from heaven on a White horse to make War
Why did God use war and conquest all through Joshua
Why did God raise judges who used violence and war to deliver Israel
Why did God teach David's hands how to war

You should study more and make informed comments
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,668
1,098
113
The same guy gas bombed civilians in Damascus back in 2012.
The Syrian War started back in 2011 when this Asad open fire on Peaceful protesters.
 
Nov 19, 2016
502
23
0
Jas 4:1 From whence come wars and fightings among you? come they not hence, even of your lusts that war in your members?

Rom 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.

It is the New Testament,not the Old Testament,and no government can rule unless God allows it,so to fight against a nation is to go against God who allows to be in power.Nothing can happen unless God allows it,and all wars come from the lusts of people,not from God.

The world will come together because of chaos,and problems,on earth,for that is the only thing that will drive the world to come together,to try to stop the problems and have peace,so there will be chaos,and problems,but it is the time for God to allow the world to come together,and cause all people that do not love Him to follow the beast kingdom.

The saints should not be going around trying to put down dictators,and supporting it,for they can only be in power because God allows it,and you do not want to be fighting against God,for if they are in power it is only because God allows it.

Also the saints are to be harmless as doves,turn the other cheek,Jesus said they that use the sword shall perish with the sword,God said when the beast kingdom goes against the saints do not fight back,do not fear what they can do to the body but can do no more,feed and clothe your enemies,and pray for them,and bless them.

Nothing can happen unless God allows it,so the saints need to stop fighting against what God allows,whether it is a leader of a nation,or personal attack,nothing can happen unless God allows it,so stop fighting against what God allows.

The Bible says resist not evil in a physical sense,for if you are attacked personally,who are you to fight against it when God said you take it like a good soldier of God,and it could not happen unless God allows it,so why did it happen,there would be a reason for it,sometimes because someone does not abide in the truth.

God said do not fight in any circumstance,and let God run things the way He wants without interfering,for that is of the flesh as the Bible states.

The saints need to stay out of God's business,for if God did not want any nation,or leader,to rule,they would not,and let the world deal with it,and the saints stay out of it,and do not support it,for God said,do not rejoice when your enemies fall as if you enjoy it,when it is feed and clothe your enemies,which if they fall it is a good thing,for they cease from their terribleness,but we do not rejoice about it,for we do not want the harm of anyone.

Can God run the show for after all it is His world,and we do not like when people take control of our things,and play with them,and nothing can happen unless God allows it,so we should not be fighting against what God allows,and we should not be fighting in any circumstance,for it could not happen unless God allows it.
 

abcdef

Senior Member
Mar 30, 2016
2,809
112
63
He doesn't need congressional approval as there is a lot of leeway in how a president can respond to something urgent. He would need congressional approval for the funding of a long protracted military operation but never needs their approval whatsoever for any military action that is either contemplated or acting upon. Congress only controls the purse strings but the president may act unilaterally if he so choses since he is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
.
Right, and when he attacks N Korea, that won't be an act of war.

He's not declaring war, he's only........What?

He doesn't need approval from the American congress of the people, to strike N Korea and start a war.

He can attack N Korea anytime he wants to, on a whim, on fake news.

Oh, and you think that a million people won't die by the next day?

N Korea is far more dangerous than ISIS or Syria.

If Trump strikes,


The Trump wars will begin.
 
J

JustWhoIAm

Guest
.
Right, and when he attacks N Korea, that won't be an act of war.

He's not declaring war, he's only........What?

He doesn't need approval from the American congress of the people, to strike N Korea and start a war.

He can attack N Korea anytime he wants to, on a whim, on fake news.

Oh, and you think that a million people won't die by the next day?

N Korea is far more dangerous than ISIS or Syria.

If Trump strikes,


The Trump wars will begin.
I just heard a bunch of echo and volume in that last line as I read it.
 

tanakh

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2015
4,635
1,041
113
77
There is an opinion that Trump attacked Syria to boost his pole ratings. Of course that is just a cynical view to take. It is
isn't it???
 
W

worker109

Guest
I agree, , you have a very level head on you, and have obviously seen the political dog and pony show, most of your life, my husband says, just like Watergate, I agree, sure looking like it, husband served invietnam,anyway, lifes very busy, I don't take any stock, in the political, hes already hurting economy, gas prices going up, yelling, smellin, raising interest rates for everyone, we might be wrong, but we believe we'd be better off with pence, as pres.,
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,668
1,098
113
.
Right, and when he attacks N Korea, that won't be an act of war.

He's not declaring war, he's only........What?

He doesn't need approval from the American congress of the people, to strike N Korea and start a war.

He can attack N Korea anytime he wants to, on a whim, on fake news.

Oh, and you think that a million people won't die by the next day?

N Korea is far more dangerous than ISIS or Syria.

If Trump strikes,


The Trump wars will begin.
That's why he's not going to to do that.....duh.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Russia recently announced that this was the last time they did not respond to such attack against Syria.

Next possible attack will lead to Russian air defence reaction.
 
Last edited:

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,668
1,098
113
Russia recently announced that this was the last time they did not respond to such attack against Syria.

Next possible attack will lead to Russian air defence reaction.
that made no sense....
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
Russia recently announced that this was the last time they did not respond to such attack against Syria.

Next possible attack will lead to Russian air defence reaction.


​So we sit back and allow Russia to be the new superpower?
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
​So we sit back and allow Russia to be the new superpower?
I dont think one country should be ultimate superpower, there should be several ones for balance.

I also do not think that USA must rule the whole planet and attack sovereign countries or else something is wrong.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,668
1,098
113
You do know about Russian air defence systems located in Syria, right?
your sentence structure was horrendous. It was worded in such a way that it made no sense
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,668
1,098
113
I don't think Russia wants to go to war over this. Perhaps Ithey should advise Syria to stop gassing their own people
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
your sentence structure was horrendous. It was worded in such a way that it made no sense
Can be, I am not native English speaker.

So I will try better - Russia anounced that they will not tolerate any other US attack against Syria and that they will respond with their air defense.

Better? I see no diff though :)
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,668
1,098
113
Can be, I am not native English speaker.

So I will try better - Russia anounced that they will not tolerate any other US attack against Syria and that they will respond with their air defense.

Better? I see no diff though :)
Chemical weapons are a war crime, as per the Geneva Convention. This would mean Putin is aiding and abetting a war criminal. So what is the proper protocol here?
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
I don't think Russia wants to go to war over this. Perhaps Ithey should advise Syria to stop gassing their own people

Did not Russia guarantee Obama they would make sure Syria would not use chemical weapons?
 
K

kaylagrl

Guest
I dont think one country should be ultimate superpower, there should be several ones for balance.

I also do not think that USA must rule the whole planet and attack sovereign countries or else something is wrong.

Quote "I dont think one country should be ultimate superpower, there should be several ones for balance."


Which countries do think should be superpowers? And who ever you think should be,they are not currently. Someone has to act and the US is the only superpower now.


Quote "
I also do not think that USA must rule the whole planet and attack sovereign countries or else something is wrong."

So you think we should allow the world to use chemical weapons even though there has been an agreement for years and years they would not be used,according to the Chemical Weapons Convention? You think a madman should not be stopped from gassing children? I dont understand this point of view.