-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Even those who believe in original sin have adopted some of what Pelagius taught. The main example being those who think people aren't that bad and have an ability within themselves to choose the things of God (namely, have faith). Free will still hasn't been defined adequately by those on the Arminian side. I'd be interested in knowing how they reconcile inability of man to faith without regeneration if they think they can come to God without his gifting of faith. I'm guessing "all men are given a measure of faith", but the logical conclusion to that is universalism OR denying the efficacy of Christ's sacrifice.
This is how you are going to reconcile free will with those who never heard the Gospel right? 
That is all, moving on
They still have God moving them to the understanding of a higher spiritual being and moral law is agreed apon by most people that lying, stealing, murder, etc is wrong. While honor, bravery, integrity, etc is right.
When someone willingly reprobate his mind to these morals they become like animals.
No moving on lol
When someone willingly reprobate his mind to these morals they become like animals.
No moving on lol
A
Well can't happen because that's not what is being taught by free will preachers.
It's no more truth what you say in Bold than if I were to say: Calvinist teach that God condemns people to hell.
Then ask you to defend it.
They are both lies, so why waste the time defending a straw man?
Both Wesley and Arminus rejected Pelagius as a false teacher and taught a version of Original sin. ..doesn't exactly match Calvin or Augustine or even each other.
They also state that without God's grace no man would be saved.
So the bold is just a misrepresentation.
It's no more truth what you say in Bold than if I were to say: Calvinist teach that God condemns people to hell.
Then ask you to defend it.
They are both lies, so why waste the time defending a straw man?
Both Wesley and Arminus rejected Pelagius as a false teacher and taught a version of Original sin. ..doesn't exactly match Calvin or Augustine or even each other.
They also state that without God's grace no man would be saved.
So the bold is just a misrepresentation.
Last edited by a moderator:
Romans 5:13New International Version (NIV)
13 To be sure, sin was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not charged against anyone’s account where there is no law.
Keep in mind it doesnt take long in life to hear one part of the law. And if we break one part we break the whole law. So this really is to the infants, mental disabled, or the small percent who never hears anything from the bible.
13 To be sure, sin was in the world before the law was given, but sin is not charged against anyone’s account where there is no law.
Keep in mind it doesnt take long in life to hear one part of the law. And if we break one part we break the whole law. So this really is to the infants, mental disabled, or the small percent who never hears anything from the bible.