And you build doctrine out of chapters, BOLD MAN.
You offer no reference to the chapter titles but only verses you build upon.
who needs context when you have a pre-text
And you build doctrine out of chapters, BOLD MAN.
You offer no reference to the chapter titles but only verses you build upon.
I do not believe this one bit, but yet and your other 3 ring circus brothers love to paint everyone with this brush, if they don't believe as you do.
Why is that?
Oh wait, yeah you are taught that.
Thank you. Hmmm, it is interesting to then consider this Pelagian viewpoint as something the RCC adopted in relation to Mary, for they claimed she was born without the stain of sin (the dogma of the immaculate conception) and also because of that she did not suffer the consequence of sin (death ). Both ex cathedra dogmas of the RCC revolve around that issue. But, back to us... I agree we are in need of the grace of God to be enabled to choose Him. The natural man does not accept the things of God for they are Spiritual, and spiritually discerned. I do believe we are asked to co-operate. God makes our acceptance of Him possible, but He does not force us to accept Him. Maybe I am wrong, but in my own process, being so stubbornly set against God, I did finally come to a place of surrender after having Him reveal Himself to me a few times in a number of different ways, over quite a period of time (fifteen years).
Not lies. There are many camps within the Reformed Camp. Calvin, Luther and Zwingli and possibly Augustine taught double predestination. There are teachings today within Reformed Camps that hold to double predestination. So no, not lies.
Double predestination (Latin: gemina praedestinatio), or the double decree, is the doctrine that God actively reprobates, or decrees damnation of some, as well as salvation for those whom he has elected. Augustine made statements that on their own seem to teach such a doctrine, but in the context of his other writings it is not clear whether he held it.
Augustine's doctrine of predestination does seem to imply a double predestinarian view.[SUP][15][/SUP] Gottschalk of Orbais taught it more explicitly in the ninth century,[SUP][20][/SUP] and Gregory of Rimini in the fourteenth.[SUP][50][/SUP]
During the Protestant Reformation, John Calvin, Martin Luther, and Huldrych Zwingli also held double predestinarian views.[SUP][51][/SUP][SUP][52][/SUP] John Calvin states: "By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which he determined with himself whatever he wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation; and, accordingly, as each has been created for one or other of these ends, we say that he has been predestinated to life or to death."[SUP][53][/SUP]
thanks for the definition trofimus............... why does romans 10:9 says whosoever calls on the Lord shall be saved........ but Jesus says not all who say Lord Lord.........?
pelagius didnt sound that bad.............. i overstand his viewpoint as well!!!!!!!!!! and augustines!!!!!!!!!!!
pelagius didnt sound that bad.............. i overstand his viewpoint as well!!!!!!!!!! and augustines!!!!!!!!!!!
Are you sure?
Jesus also says He will draw all men to Him (John 12:32).The thing is, Jesus makes the claim that all who are drawn will come to him. So if all are drawn, he is bound by his own words to save everyone.
I also went through the same resistance as you talk about here. Finally I submitted. I see it as the effectual drawing of God. If he draws you, he saves you.
And now you must live in a fear of loosing your salvation...?
The thing is, Jesus makes the claim that all who are drawn will come to him. So if all are drawn, he is bound by his own words to save everyone.
I also went through the same resistance as you talk about here. Finally I submitted. I see it as the effectual drawing of God. If he draws you, he saves you.
Jesus also says He will draw all men to Him (John 12:32).
God desires all to come to repentance that none perish...
At some point, the will of man is involved.
Punishment makes no sense otherwise.
First of all, as I've made clear a hundred times if I've done it once, is to clarify that I don't really identify as a Calvinist. That is what I'm called by others, as are many of us here. Being a Calvinist also doesn't make someone a disciple of Calvin.
Quite the contrary, The spirit bears witness with my Spirit that I am a son of God.
You wont have a clue, so do not bother asking me to explain.
This beats having to wonder all the time, am I elected or not....another thing you all hide quite nicely.
Quite the contrary, The spirit bears witness with my Spirit that I am a son of God.
You wont have a clue, so do not bother asking me to explain.
This beats having to wonder all the time, am I elected or not....another thing you all hide quite nicely.
This is like saying being a christian does not make me a disciple of Christ.
Let that one sink in real deep boy and there may be hope for you.
I was taught by the bible. I decided to read it. And then read it again. And continue to read it. Where did you learn your obvious man-made philosophy? Obviously not from the bible.