LOL And fall into a vat of ice cream.We will probably be assimilated.
The four "corners" you can't seem to get past are
four extremities, I.e., the four cardinal directions.
Ever bothered to read past Rev. 7:1?
Did you hear...???
There are now people that don't believe the earth is flat and they don't believe it's round... they believe it's bubbly
Seriously, go google it![]()
Psalm 93:1
The Lord reigneth, he is clothed with majesty; the Lord is clothed with strength, wherewith he hath girded himself: the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved
1 Samuel 2:8
He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the Lord's, and he hath set the world upon them.
The Copernican (Heliocentric) Model:
- The stars are immovable – their apparent daily motion is caused by the daily rotation of Earth
- Earth is moved in a sphere around the Sun, causing the apparent annual migration of the Sun. Earth has more than one motion
- Earth’s orbital motion around the Sun causes the seeming reverse in direction of the motions of the planets
https://www.universetoday.com/33113/heliocentric-model/
There are people who believe it is "pear" shaped too. All of you if you stay up to date with NASA.
I have always suspected the earth was round.Neither do I, but I can recognize the shape of a round object or shadow when I see it.
Did you hear...???
There are now people that don't believe the earth is flat and they don't believe it's round... they believe it's bubbly
Seriously, go google it![]()
There are people who believe it is "pear" shaped too. All of you if you stay up to date with NASA.
Well, I don't know about pear shape but it is slightly oblong due to the effects of rotation. The distance around the earth is greater at the equator - 7,926.4, than at the poles - 7,899.8 miles. That is a difference of 26.6 miles.
Not just oblong due to the effects of rotation, but also slightly wider below the equator than above the equator, hence the "pear" shape.
You really need to get with the programing. Don't correct me until you know what you are talking about.
LOL. I was not trying to correct you. I was simply revealing the limits of my knowledge on the subject.
And you are still correct, the pear shape his mentions is so small it can't be notice, it's weighing pennies, if a person is in space the planet doesn't look like a pear, but a oblong sphere.
We are looking at vertical deviations of up to 80 m from the mean. On the basis of a 6371 km radius, that is a deviation from normal of about 0.001%... So the pear shape thing isn't even notice it's way to small of a difference to even bother with.
The pear shape is spiltting hairs over nothing.
LOL. I was not trying to correct you. I was simply revealing the limits of my knowledge on the subject.
That's interesting. I did not know that.
I'm sorry for being dishonest with you, I'm actually literally playing devil's advocate to prove a point.
The limits of our knowledge have to do with accepting and regurgitating everything NASA tells us. You are an elder in this world who I'm guessing spent many years researching a variety of subjects, but you are in a situation where everything you know and believe can be proved wrong at the drop of a hat if NASA makes a new claim that is completely incompatible with everything they have said in the past.
I'm a flat earther, and instead of accepting the earth is a pear, perhaps you should look into some of the NASA hoax conspiracies instead.
This is only three minutes, please watch instead of accepting pear logic on the authority of man:
[video=youtube;Gem10A4yt5w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gem10A4yt5w[/video]
If the earth is flat, how do you propose to explain the fact that we have never found the edge of the planet?