I'll never be able to prove to anyone that the candlestick is Jesus the Word of God, because most people won't accept that the Word of God is the word of God.
I'll be back later to comment on the rest of your post.
Jesus is a book?
I'll never be able to prove to anyone that the candlestick is Jesus the Word of God, because most people won't accept that the Word of God is the word of God.
I'll be back later to comment on the rest of your post.
I see your point on me being inconsistent but I'm actually not being inconsistent and I'm not making the oil irrelevant. I view the candlestick in the same way a you view the lamp stand, a lamp holder with oil flowing through it to illuminate a lamp. I don't know why the KJV translators chose candlestick instead lamp stand, but no matter what the reason, both mean the same - an apparatus that holds a lamp whether it be a wax candle, a light bulb or an oil lamp. I'm not claiming that a wax candle is a better analogy, when the KJV uses the word candlestick or candle it is not talking about a wax candle.While I understand your point here, I would also suggest that you are being surprisingly inconsistent. Let me demonstrate...
You say that the "candlestick" represents Christ. If it is truly a candlestick, and not a lampstand, you are saying that the oil (which represents the Holy Spirit) that flows from the source to the flame is irrelevant, and that a better analogy is a wax candle. If I were to take the same approach which you took with "a son of the gods" vs. "a son of God" in Daniel, I'd say you're preaching a different Jesus.
Now, I don't take that approach, because I also understand that slight changes in wording can be understood adequately. You have argued previously that the exact words of the KJV are critical, and that minor variations in wording "can't be used by the Holy Spirit" (I disagree with your assessment, by the way). With regard to being able to speak through the text using words which are "not quite accurate", either the Holy Spirit can or He can't. You're arguing both sides of the same issue, and I call you to be consistent. Your dogmatic approach with other passages now undermines your position here.![]()
Our minds automatically think wax candle when we think of a candle because that's the most common meaning of candle, but candle comes from the Latin word candere which means to glow, shine or shoot out light.Well keep in mind lamps did not mean electrical fixtures in interpretation (obviously) Lamps represented things which floated on liquids etc etc...(from what I have gathered thus far) And why would they need it to be a literal translation of a candle of wax and such? We see Nicodemus, having that problem trying to interpret what Jesus said in John as well concerning the meaning of being born anew, or as some translations have it - being born-again. He took it literally in only one aspect of the whole of the truth and was lost.
Thus, I am trying to see what the spirit has to say about the premise that all Scripture is God-breathed, so how does this work - Lord? Then, I will search the meanings of things therein in study of the facts as well led by the spirit. But I have not done that fully, because that is not what the thread is about. Nor, is it a priority in things that are important with my limited time, not that His Word being set right is not important.
Old English candel "lamp, lantern, candle," an early ecclesiastical borrowing from Latin candela "a light, torch, candle made of tallow or wax," from candere "to shine," from PIE root *kand- "to glow, to shine, to shoot out light" (source also of Sanskrit cand- "to give light, shine," candra- "shining, glowing, moon;" Greek kandaros "coal;" Welsh cann "white;" Middle Irish condud "fuel").Oh, please...
Sure, from the context it is cleare that it is not a candle, thats why the word is wrong here. Lamp is the right one.
Vacation update - tropical storm Cindy has caused the beaches to be closed for 3 days now!![]()
No, his spirit resides in a book.
Do I think lamp stand would be a better word... yes I do, but who am I to decide the words that God uses in his word. Just because I think another word would have been better deosn't mean another word would serve God's purposes. There is a reason why the KJV translators used candle and candlestick, but I don't know that reason yet... I'm sure there is a golden nugget hidden in those words though.![]()
Right. That kind of thinking leads man to be the final authority on what God said. Man is required to read, study, believe, and live it. Man is not to determine which word is the best fit because it sounds better, or it's easier to read and understand.
It's not easy to explain, the words in the bible are just words but there is a spirit behind those words... that is what I am calling Jesus. What is your take on the verse below?What do you mean by this? His spirit resides in our hearts... not in book.
Our minds automatically think wax candle when we think of a candle because that's the most common meaning of candle, but candle comes from the Latin word candere which means to glow, shine or shoot out light.
candle (n.)Old English candel "lamp, lantern, candle," an early ecclesiastical borrowing from Latin candela "a light, torch, candle made of tallow or wax," from candere "to shine," from PIE root *kand- "to glow, to shine, to shoot out light" (source also of Sanskrit cand- "to give light, shine," candra- "shining, glowing, moon;" Greek kandaros "coal;" Welsh cann "white;" Middle Irish condud "fuel").
Do I think lamp stand would be a better word... yes I do, but who am I to decide the words that God uses in his word. Just because I think another word would have been better deosn't mean another word would serve God's purposes. There is a reason why the KJV translators used candle and candlestick, but I don't know that reason yet... I'm sure there is a golden nugget hidden in those words though.![]()
God gave us the ability to think for ourselves. Repeatedly you obliquely assert that the KJV translators are the final authority for all time, and effectively avow checking our brains at the door on the way in. It has been demonstrated that some KJV words are not current in their meanings. That has nothing to do with the reader being the final authority, but with the reality that language changes over time. Even if "candlestick" were the current term for what we would call a "lampstand" (which I doubt), it is still not the correct term today.
It's not easy to explain, the words in the bible are just words but there is a spirit behind those words... that is what I am calling Jesus. What is your take on the verse below?
John 6:63 KJV
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
God gave us the ability to think for ourselves. Repeatedly you obliquely assert that the KJV translators are the final authority for all time, and effectively avow checking our brains at the door on the way in. It has been demonstrated that some KJV words are not current in their meanings. That has nothing to do with the reader being the final authority, but with the reality that language changes over time. Even if "candlestick" were the current term for what we would call a "lampstand" (which I doubt), it is still not the correct term today.
You know that John uses very simple Greek and so very simple sentences, its everywhere in his writings.
So even it is said simply, it means a little deeper thing - teachings of Christ bring life and are spiritual.
I doubt that candlestick was ever the current term, even in 1611 but consider this. If the bible is an esoteric book (which it is) and it's written so that the true meaning is hidden in the symbolic language does it make sense that the hidden meaning would still be maintained if the language is updated to modern language?
The fact that God's word is hdden from the world and revealed to his own is found in John 14:23. Verse 23 gives the how... and this verse itself is esoteric in that you have to know what "His Words" are.Esoteric is diametrically opposed to the meaning of God's purposes for His Word. God's Word is for the masses and even a child can enter in. It is to be understood plainly; study not withstanding. But it is never to be purposed to be "Abstruse"; intended for only a small group whom God would have thought would be His elect in a specialized knowledge to understand. That premise, which gives voice to your next statement of "Hidden Meanings," is without clout or influence due to the fact the premise is lacking sober judgement. Modern language then, is not abstracting from any magical words of hidden repute, but is applying itself to the actual words connotations. This is not losing its meaning, it is shedding a different light on the meaning at hand still holding to the literal connotation.
No, his spirit resides in a book.
You have gone from the NIV to the KJV... I have been reading and studying the KJV since the age of 13 and I am now 71... I have heard preacher after preacher speak from it over 58 years and in all that time not one ever said God's Spirit resides in the KJV... My KJV is composed of leather, paper and ink... The Spirit is not in the words but in the God who said them, and his Son the Lord Jesus Christ who lived and taught them and the Holy Spirit that reveals these truths to us sinful mortals... Do not get me wrong every word of God is precious but unless this cold and stony heart is changed to a heart of flesh by divine intervention, the words of God in any translation don't mean a thing... Remember the admonition of Paul to Timothy, I think you are sadly lacking in rightly dividing the word of truth... Brother Glen
2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
You have gone from the NIV to the KJV... I have been reading and studying the KJV since the age of 13 and I am now 71... I have heard preacher after preacher speak from it over 58 years and in all that time not one ever said God's Spirit resides in the KJV... My KJV is composed of leather, paper and ink... The Spirit is not in the words but in the God who said them, and his Son the Lord Jesus Christ who lived and taught them and the Holy Spirit that reveals these truths to us sinful mortals... Do not get me wrong every word of God is precious but unless this cold and stony heart is changed to a heart of flesh by divine intervention, the words of God in any translation don't mean a thing... Remember the admonition of Paul to Timothy, I think you are sadly lacking in rightly dividing the word of truth... Brother Glen
2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.