Help a Catholic understand Protestantism better please

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
Yeah it is certainly a mysterious verse, and really I would have to look at it in greater depth to really give a good answer to that question Fran, but the reason I mentioned it is because it shows that Paul seems to understand that "Christ's sufferings" still have more to accomplish in the world; something like the cure has been given but it has not yet taken its full effect in the world.

Again I would need to research a bit more, but from what I understand the Church usually sees it in the context of Christ's call to us to carry our crosses after Him, and the Churches role in being an instrument of new creation in the world (NT Wright is great here I think). That part of the way that the resurrection and new creation happen is that Christians participate in Christ's work of transforming evil into good; of making occasions of persecution etc into occasions of mercy and charity.

So I think I agree with what you said, Paul is suffering as Christ suffered, but also he claims to be doing it "for the sake of the Church". We thus see Christ's cross not just as an event that is over and done with but rather an instrument of transformation in the world, and that as Christians who are baptized into Christ's death and resurrection, and united to Him as members of His body, we too have been given the grace to share in this transformation in our own crosses or sufferings.

I think St. John Paul II expounds on this a lot in his letters "Salvifici Doloris" (available onlilne), about redemptive suffering. He he actually begins the work by citing this verse. The letter as a whole is a beautiful reflection of finding meaning in suffering, it is worth looking at.

I hope that makes some sense
I know about redemptive suffering. I'm not sure I agree with it, but we cannot know for sure.
There's too much we don't know.

This makes me think of Mass when the sacrifices of the congregation are added to Christ's sacrifice.
Romans 12:1

If I could remember I'll bring this up with a Priest I know. If I see him soon, I'll post here. (he's a theologian).
 

AllenW

Senior Member
Apr 20, 2016
1,450
70
48
I know about redemptive suffering. I'm not sure I agree with it, but we cannot know for sure.
There's too much we don't know.

This makes me think of Mass when the sacrifices of the congregation are added to Christ's sacrifice.
Romans 12:1

If I could remember I'll bring this up with a Priest I know. If I see him soon, I'll post here. (he's a theologian).
Yes, the benefits of living in Roman territory.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
Yes, the benefits of living in Roman territory.
The benefits of knowing Don Enzo.
Fra' Lorenzo ain't bad either.
Then there's Don Fulvio, but I'm not sure with him.
Don Giovanni is very nice, but a pastor, not a theologian.
Don Alessandro is great, but he's got 8 parishes now. I hate to bother him.

Then there's Francesco. He's a Friar or something. Something Franciscan (no pun intended).
I spoke to him only this morning in the bookstore. Asked him if Judas was saved at the beginning.
He said Yes. But, He's not the Pope, so he's not infallible...

LOL
 
S

Susanna

Guest
The benefits of knowing Don Enzo.
Fra' Lorenzo ain't bad either.
Then there's Don Fulvio, but I'm not sure with him.
Don Giovanni is very nice, but a pastor, not a theologian.
Don Alessandro is great, but he's got 8 parishes now. I hate to bother him.

Then there's Francesco. He's a Friar or something. Something Franciscan (no pun intended).
I spoke to him only this morning in the bookstore. Asked him if Judas was saved at the beginning.
He said Yes. But, He's not the Pope, so he's not infallible...

LOL
I have visited the Duomo di Milano and St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. It was fantastic.
 

Huckleberry

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
1,698
96
48
Hey Huckleberry,
Sorry that I have not gotten back to you.......
No apology necessary.

If I were to answer your question directly I would say, I don't think the Bible necessaarily promises us absolute assurance.......

.......So my unwillingness to say that I have absolute certainty is because I know that it is possible that in my weakness I could deny the Lord's mercy or fail to do His will. Again, that doesn't mean I don't live with confidence, but it is a confidence of Hope that God's goodness will sustain me beyond my own weaknesses, but not the assurance that says I might never turn away from Him.
To me this is the crux of the Catholic vs. Protestant situation.
Are you trusting that Christ's shed blood washed away your sins once and for all, or are
you living life with concern that you, one who identifies as Christian, could end up in hell?

Most Protestants believe (based on Scripture) that when we receive
God's forgiveness, that forever settles the question of Heaven or hell.
No doubt many here will disagree with me, and of course
they're wrong, but this position is Scripturally sound.
It's so simple and straightforward that a little child can understand it.

Thanks for engaging me.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
I have visited the Duomo di Milano and St. Peter's Basilica in Rome. It was fantastic.
The Duomo in Milano is the most beautiful church I've seen on the exterior.
Nothing is like St. Peter's in Rome, for the interior.

Did you notice how the Piazza, with the two "arms" seems to be hugging everyone?

Also, the next time you come over, make sure to see St. Antonio di Padova. It's something.
And very spiritual in a way I can't explain.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
No apology necessary.


To me this is the crux of the Catholic vs. Protestant situation.
Are you trusting that Christ's shed blood washed away your sins once and for all, or are
you living life with concern that you, one who identifies as Christian, could end up in hell?

Most Protestants believe (based on Scripture) that when we receive
God's forgiveness, that forever settles the question of Heaven or hell.
No doubt many here will disagree with me, and of course
they're wrong, but this position is Scripturally sound.
It's so simple and straightforward that a little child can understand it.

Thanks for engaging me.
Of course they're wrong?
How could you be so sure?

Is that you in that avatar?
OK.
I won't argue with ya!
 

Huckleberry

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
1,698
96
48
Is that you in that avatar?
No that's Kurt Angle, but I totally look like him.
Okay, maybe not totally, but I do have two arms, two legs, one head, and I'm a man.
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
No that's Kurt Angle, but I totally look like him.
Okay, maybe not totally, but I do have two arms, two legs, one head, and I'm a man.
LOL

Oh.

Well then.
We could discuss OSAS one fine day !!
:)
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
WimpyPete, you list many things, however what is it that we need to believe? Paul says many things in Chapter 4.

So I am looking for more specific answer.

I think if you focus on this, it will cut right through the problems you listed in the OP.





It requires believing, as Paul talks about in Romans,
I think I have touched on this already a bit in various posts, but the Scriptures seem to speak of various things. It requires believing, as Paul talks about in Romans, particularly in Ch. 4. Peter tells us to be Baptized in accordance with the great comission Christ gave and Peter repeats in Acts 2:38. Jesus also tells the man who asks him this question to keep the commandments (Luke 18:18ff). Paul seems to affirm that this is also necessaary when he speaks in the negative of the things which would prevent one from obtaining unto life such as adultery etc (1 Cor. 6:9). John 6:53 would seem to indicate the eating of Christ's body and blood as a necessity for having life. Luke 14:33 would seem to indicate that I have to prefer Christ to all things in order to truly be His disciple. Mark 8 and Luke 9 seem to indicate the necessity of carrying one's cross as well. Apparently from Matthews judgement scene we also have to care for the poor and hungry etc (Matt. 25).

I'm sure more could be added to this brief list, but my only point is that salvation in Scripture seems to a multivalent reality which avoids an easy oversimplification. I think it does seem that given what we know of Christ from the Gospels and the way He treats sinners the hope is that out of His infinite love for us He will never refuse us if we truly desire Him and ask His mercy. That's where I think the good thief is a good example. He couldn't get baptized or eat Christ's flesh in that moment, or commit adultery for that matter (in his heart he could I guess), but it shows that God is not necessarily limited in His ability to save us, and that a true repentant heart, which God can't spurn (Psalm 51:17), we hope would be enough if that is all we are capable of. But if we do have opportunities for baptism or to carry our cross or feed the hungry etc and we don't do them, is our "faith" at that point enough to "save" us? That seems hard to say given passages such as Matthew's judgment or Luke 13:26 etc

So to summarize I think the ideal sequence is: believe and ask for mercy, if possible be baptized and then live the Christian life.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,043
13,049
113
58
MMD

THERE IS ONLY ONE definition for believe.
Is there more than one Koinè Greek Language?

You've NEVER explained believe because to do so would go against all you say about how works are not NECESSARY.
When, in fact, they are.

And YOU don't have to explain the truth to me MMD.

I believe I know the truth.
And it's not what YOU teach.
You only think you know the truth. Go back and read post #7388 on page 370 in the "Not By Works" thread again. - http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/146296-not-works-370.html#post3091863

As I already explained in that post:

The word translated believe is from the greek word pisteuō which means "to have faith (in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing), that is, credit; by implication to entrust (especially one’s spiritual well being to Christ).

The word "believe" can describe mere mental assent belief, as in James 2:19, or also include "trust and reliance" in Christ for salvation, as in Acts 16:31. In James 2:19, nobody is questioning the fact that the demons believe "mental assent" that "there is one God," but they do not believe/entrust their spiritual well being to Christ; have faith/reliance upon Christ for salvation. Their trust and reliance is in Satan, as demonstrated by their rebellion in heaven and continuous evil works.

Saving belief/faith is more than just an "intellectual acknowledgment" to the existence and historical facts about Christ. Saving belief/faith is a complete trust in Christ's finished work of redemption as the ALL-sufficient means of our salvation.

I also explained in that same post how I was in a discussion with a Roman Catholic who claims that the Roman Catholic church does not teach salvation by works, then afterwards, erroneously defined believe/faith to include works. In post #7396, you said that you agreed with the Roman Catholic, demonstrating that you don't know the truth.

I then explained it further to you in post #7412 that t
he Greek words for "pistis" and "pisteuo" are two forms of the same word. "Pistis" is the noun form, "pisteuo" is the verb form. Nothing in the root meaning of either word carries any concept of works. If you BELIEVE IN HIM (Christ) for salvation then you are trusting in HIM as the ALL-sufficient means of your salvation. This belief results in actions appropriate to the belief (good works) - but the actions are NOT INHERENT in the belief.


 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,043
13,049
113
58
Isn't this, LIKE, what YOU do???

What truth are you defending? You don't know the truth.

You don't even know what's going on in the Catholic Church.

Try going to some bible studies of theirs so you could speak as one who knows
what he's talking about....
I know the truth and the truth has set me free. Praise God! :) I grew up in the Roman Catholic church and I also attended a Catholic school for 5 years. I've been to their Bible studies in the past and have had numerous discussions with Roman Catholics on various Bible discussion forums, so I don't need a lecture from you on what they believe and teach. ;)
 

Adstar

Senior Member
Jul 24, 2016
7,426
3,477
113
Adstar, I am not trying to say that you have been a jerk or something, what I mean is that both your posts as well as Magenta's are based on inaccurate understandings of Catholicism as well as a lot of assumptions about me and my own relationship with the Lord.

You accuse me of believing in works righteousness on par with the pharisees and thus of being on the path to eternal destruction; you say that Catholicism is simply following traditions of men and that it is not Christian. You also accuse me of not being here with honest intentions and of simply trying to sneak on to preach Catholicism.

Magenta began by accusing me of not knowing God or the Bible. When I try to respond by showing how central the Bible is to my daily life and how I am dedicated to seeking intimacy with the Lord you simply accuse me of attempting a self-righteous works righteousness. (I again refer to the "Join Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification", if you want to see how untrue it is to accuse Catholics of believing in salvation by works apart from faith, and to see how much progress has been made in understanding between Catholics and various Protestant denominations).

This is why I find it hard to dialog with either of you. Magenta presumes I have no relationship with Christ, you accuse me of not believing in His act of salvation for me, and then you misunderstand what we believe about salvation and condemn me for a belief that I don't believe in.

I didn't come to preach Catholicism, but when so many responded to my posts with inaccurate understandings of Catholicism I simply tried to respond with what the Church actually believes. I'm not asking people here to become Catholic, but it would be nice if people actually knew what actually is truly Catholic. If you want to disagree with us, fine, but at least disagree with what we actually believe and not a misconstrued version of it
If you are a true catholic you believe in doing penance after confessing your sins to your priest in the confessional... Doing penance for your sins is an acknowledgement that you must pay for your own sins by doing penance..

If you are a true catholic you believe in purgatory where people have their sins purged from them after death before they can be clean enough to enter into Heaven with God.. This is a complete denial of the sufficiency of the Atonement of the LORD Jesus Christ to purge us of all sins and to make us clean to enter into eternity with Jesus..

Now if you do not believe in Purgatory or doing penance for your sins after attending a confessional then you are not a catholic. because all catholics must submit to all the teachings and doctrines of the catholic church.. But if you are a true catholic and believe in doing penance and you believe that purgatory is a place where dead people are purged of their sins you do not know God and you belong to a false religion called catholicism..

It's pretty simple..

And why did you even mention that you where a catholic in your first post? If you really wanted to know about calvinism and such why not just ask about calvinism.. This thread would have been a lot shorter and with far less fuss if you have not injected catholicism into the mix..
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
You only think you know the truth. Go back and read post #7388 on page 370 in the "Not By Works" thread again. - http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/146296-not-works-370.html#post3091863

As I already explained in that post:

The word translated believe is from the greek word pisteuō which means "to have faith (in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing), that is, credit; by implication to entrust (especially one’s spiritual well being to Christ).

The word "believe" can describe mere mental assent belief, as in James 2:19, or also include "trust and reliance" in Christ for salvation, as in Acts 16:31. In James 2:19, nobody is questioning the fact that the demons believe "mental assent" that "there is one God," but they do not believe/entrust their spiritual well being to Christ; have faith/reliance upon Christ for salvation. Their trust and reliance is in Satan, as demonstrated by their rebellion in heaven and continuous evil works.

Saving belief/faith is more than just an "intellectual acknowledgment" to the existence and historical facts about Christ. Saving belief/faith is a complete trust in Christ's finished work of redemption as the ALL-sufficient means of our salvation.

I also explained in that same post how I was in a discussion with a Roman Catholic who claims that the Roman Catholic church does not teach salvation by works, then afterwards, erroneously defined believe/faith to include works. In post #7396, you said that you agreed with the Roman Catholic, demonstrating that you don't know the truth.

I then explained it further to you in post #7412 that t
he Greek words for "pistis" and "pisteuo" are two forms of the same word. "Pistis" is the noun form, "pisteuo" is the verb form. Nothing in the root meaning of either word carries any concept of works. If you BELIEVE IN HIM (Christ) for salvation then you are trusting in HIM as the ALL-sufficient means of your salvation. This belief results in actions appropriate to the belief (good works) - but the actions are NOT INHERENT in the belief.


Good Morning MMD

Here's what I'd love to understand, and then I'll answer the above...
I grew up Catholic. My two children attended Catholic schools from the 1st grade.
I became born again while in the CC. They weren't doing anything then, not even some catechism,
let alone bible study.

I was aware that something had happened to me when I met Jesus one day in my kitchen, over in Whitestone, NY.
A few years later, my younger Brother became born again in a Nazarene Church. I also started attending that Church.

I had THE SAME expereience YOU had. (none of us has the same experience, but you know what I mean).
Why do you suppose you have such dislike, if not hatred, for the CC ?
Why do you think I don't?

And if YOUR Church started getting persecuted --- which is what we're doing to the CC on these threads ---- wouldn't
it be nice if other Christians defended YOUR Church? Even if they didn't agree with your doctrine?

There's a tiny Church, in membership, a ways from me. They believe you could be saved AFTER DEATH. What should we do about them? This COULD be a salvation issue.

The CC presents NO salvation issues. I'd say they go over board, but if a Catholic is sincere and loves Jesus, what do you care if they go to confession and believe in purgatory and Honor the mother of Jesus? HOW would that get them lost??



Now, to answer your post...
I thank you for your effort in going back and looking for your answer.

Here's the problem, and I've said it before.

YOU STILL have NOT told me what BELIEVE means in the Greek.

The reason why you can't tell me what it means is because it goes against the grain of your belief system.
If you told me COMPLETELY what the explanation is, you'd have to ADMIT that WORKS ARE NECESSARY.
And you don't WANT to do that.

Simply said, since I've explained it many times and will not do it again now,
BELIEVE means to so trust the person that you FOLLOW THEM AND LEARN FROM THEM AND EMULATE OR IMITATE THAT PERSON.

How could anyone, such as yourself and some Others here, EVER give the above explanation, which is the correct one BTW, because it brings the word to its ultimate conclusion, if they cannot even ADMIT that WORKS ARE NECESSARY.

Works are necessary IF we want to say that we BELIEVE IN JESUS, because we have to IMITATE Him and this does not suit you.
So.... you never give a FULL MEANING to the word BELIEVE.


As to your friend. Your friend told you correctly that the CC does NOT teach salvation by works. Salvation is by grace through faith. You REALLY think Catholic theoloogians don't know this???????? HOW DUMB do you think they are, anyway?

Works DO COME IN.
Dontcha hate it?????

AFTER SALVATION.
But this is an old story which you don't accept.

Just because YOU and Others don't accept it, does NOT mean it's incorrect.

I keep telling you to tell me the diffeence between Justification and Sanctification but you muddle that too because the meaning of Sanctification does not suit you either.

Nothing with the word WORK in it suits you.
If you believe that works are a RESULT of salvation, fine. That's true.

But be Christian enough (in theology) to admit that YES, WORKS ARE NECESSARY.

If you're not willing to do that, it means you don't agree with it and that is incorrect theology ---- the study of God.

GOD DEMANDS OBEDIENCE.

Show me one verse that gives even a hint of God NOT demanding obedience.
 
Last edited:
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
I know the truth and the truth has set me free. Praise God! :) I grew up in the Roman Catholic church and I also attended a Catholic school for 5 years. I've been to their Bible studies in the past and have had numerous discussions with Roman Catholics on various Bible discussion forums, so I don't need a lecture from you on what they believe and teach. ;)
It's too bad you don't need a lecture from me.
Different Catholics believe different concepts.
JUST LIKE WE PROTESTANTS DO.

So it depends on which Catholic you speak to.
I know some that believe that if they miss ONE MASS
they're going straight to hell.
But is this true or is it an old-fashioned teaching to get
people to go to Mass?????

Just saying...
 
Apr 30, 2016
5,162
75
0
If you are a true catholic you believe in doing penance after confessing your sins to your priest in the confessional... Doing penance for your sins is an acknowledgement that you must pay for your own sins by doing penance..

If you are a true catholic you believe in purgatory where people have their sins purged from them after death before they can be clean enough to enter into Heaven with God.. This is a complete denial of the sufficiency of the Atonement of the LORD Jesus Christ to purge us of all sins and to make us clean to enter into eternity with Jesus..

Now if you do not believe in Purgatory or doing penance for your sins after attending a confessional then you are not a catholic. because all catholics must submit to all the teachings and doctrines of the catholic church.. But if you are a true catholic and believe in doing penance and you believe that purgatory is a place where dead people are purged of their sins you do not know God and you belong to a false religion called catholicism..

It's pretty simple..

And why did you even mention that you where a catholic in your first post? If you really wanted to know about calvinism and such why not just ask about calvinism.. This thread would have been a lot shorter and with far less fuss if you have not injected catholicism into the mix..
WP does just fine at answering for himself.

My only question is:

WHY shouldn't he have stated he was Catholic?
He sounds like a very honest person to me.

Some here state they're Calvinists....
THAT IS TRULY A NON-CHRISTIAN BELIEF.

Yes, I would go so far as to say it it NOT Christian.

So.... Being Catholic seems perfectly normal to me.

And if he doesn't answer you, I will.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,043
13,049
113
58
I became born again while in the CC.
Please explain to me exactly HOW you became born again while in the CC. What exactly did you BELIEVE or DO that you believe caused you to become born again?

I was aware that something had happened to me when I met Jesus one day in my kitchen, over in Whitestone, NY.
A few years later, my younger Brother became born again in a Nazarene Church. I also started attending that Church.
I became born again the very moment that I placed my faith (belief, trust, reliance) in CHRIST ALONE as the ALL-sufficient means of my salvation several years ago and this was IN SPITE of what the Roman Catholic church teaches about the plan of salvation and NOT BECAUSE of what they teach.

I had THE SAME expereience YOU had. (none of us has the same experience, but you know what I mean).
Why do you suppose you have such dislike, if not hatred, for the CC?
Why do you think I don't?
The CC perverts the gospel of Christ, had added to God's word and lead me astray all the years I attended there. Maybe that explains why I have such dislike for the CC? Why in the world would I defend the CC?

And if YOUR Church started getting persecuted --- which is what we're doing to the CC on these threads ---- wouldn't
it be nice if other Christians defended YOUR Church? Even if they didn't agree with your doctrine?
Any church that perverts the gospel needs to be exposed. My church does not pervert the gospel, so it's mainly works salvationists who would persecute it. If you fully understood the truth about Roman Catholicism, then you would not be so soft on the CC.

There's a tiny Church, in membership, a ways from me. They believe you could be saved AFTER DEATH. What should we do about them? This COULD be a salvation issue.
They need to read Hebrews 9:27.

The CC presents NO salvation issues. I'd say they go over board, but if a Catholic is sincere and loves Jesus, what do you care if they go to confession and believe in purgatory and Honor the mother of Jesus? HOW would that get them lost??
Purgatory denies the sufficiency of Christ's atonement for sin on the cross. As Mike Gendron points out in his article on purgatory - Purgatory is a travesty on the justice of God and a disgraceful fabrication that robs Christ Jesus of His glory and honor. He alone satisfied divine justice, once and for all, by the perfect and finished sacrifice of Himself. The fatal deception of Purgatory blinds Catholics from the glorious Gospel of grace. It is one of Satan's many lies which keep his captives from knowing and trusting the sufficiency of Jesus Christ. - Purgatory: Purifying Fire or Fatal Fable by Mike Gendron - The Urbans in Mexico

Now, to answer your post...
I thank you for your effort in going back and looking for your answer.

Here's the problem, and I've said it before.

YOU STILL have NOT told me what BELIEVE means in the Greek.
Hello! YES I DID. The word translated believe is from the greek word pisteuō which means "to have faith (in, upon, or with respect to, a person or thing), that is, credit; by implication to entrust (especially one’s spiritual well being to Christ).

◄ 4100. pisteuó ►
Strong's Concordance
pisteuó: to believe, entrust
Original Word: πιστεύω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: pisteuó
Phonetic Spelling: (pist-yoo'-o)
Short Definition: I believe, have faith in
Definition: I believe, have faith in, trust in; pass: I am entrusted with.

The reason why you can't tell me what it means is because it goes against the grain of your belief system.
If you told me COMPLETELY what the explanation is, you'd have to ADMIT that WORKS ARE NECESSARY.
And you don't WANT to do that.
I told you what it means, multiple times. Completely? Works are necessary for what? Works are the fruit, by product and demonstrative evidence of believing in Him/faith in Christ, but not the essence of believing in Him/faith in Christ and not the means of our salvation. So I ask you again, works are necessary for what?

Simply said, since I've explained it many times and will not do it again now,
BELIEVE means to so trust the person that you FOLLOW THEM AND LEARN FROM THEM AND EMULATE OR IMITATE THAT PERSON.
That would be the FRUIT of BELIEVE and not the essence of BELIEVE. This is where you try to "shoe horn" works "into" BELIEVE, just as the Roman Catholic church tries to "infuse" works into believe/faith and teaches that we are saved by BOTH believe/faith AND works. Believe/faith is the root of salvation and works are the fruit. No fruit at all would demonstrate there is no root. Simple!

How could anyone, such as yourself and some Others here, EVER give the above explanation, which is the correct one BTW, because it brings the word to its ultimate conclusion, if they cannot even ADMIT that WORKS ARE NECESSARY. Works are necessary IF we want to say that we BELIEVE IN JESUS, because we have to IMITATE Him and this does not suit you. So.... you never give a FULL MEANING to the word BELIEVE.
Works are the demonstrative evidence that we BELIEVE IN JESUS, yet the definition of believe is not works.

As to your friend. Your friend told you correctly that the CC does NOT teach salvation by works.
He's not my friend, but regardless, he was not correct about the CC not teaching salvation by works. He said that we are saved by faith as long as faith is properly defined, then he went on to say that faith INCLUDES the check list of works that he listed which equates to saying that we are saved by faith (his version of faith) + that list of works that he "infused" into faith. Sugar coated double talk.

Salvation is by grace through faith. You REALLY think Catholic theoloogians don't know this???????? HOW DUMB do you think they are, anyway?

Works DO COME IN.
Dontcha hate it?????
It's not about Catholic theologians being dumb, just deceived. Salvation is by grace through faith, NOT WORKS, yet Catholics say we are saved by grace through faith INFUSED WITH WORKS, which is not what Paul said. I don't hate works, I just put them in their proper place--subsequent to regeneration and salvation. Works come in as the fruit of faith, not the essence of faith and not the means of our salvation. Are you figuring this out yet?

AFTER SALVATION.
But this is an old story which you don't accept.

Just because YOU and Others don't accept it, does NOT mean it's incorrect.
I accept that AFTER we have been saved by grace through faith, works then come in (Ephesians 2:8-10). *We are saved FOR good works and NOT BY good works.

I keep telling you to tell me the diffeence between Justification and Sanctification but you muddle that too because the meaning of Sanctification does not suit you either.
I have explained that to you as well but apparently what I explain to you continues to go right over your head. :eek: BTY it's actually Roman Catholics who muddle the different between Justification and Sanctification by confusing ongoing Sanctification with Justification. Go back and read post #9067 in the Not By Works thread and follow up with post #9079 - http://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/146296-not-works-454.html

Nothing with the word WORK in it suits you.
If you believe that works are a RESULT of salvation, fine. That's true.
Works are the RESULT of salvation, not the means of salvation. Huge difference!

But be Christian enough (in theology) to admit that YES, WORKS ARE NECESSARY.
After hearing you agree with the Roman Catholic who included works into the definition of BELIEVE, hearing you say works are necessary is a loaded statement! Works are the necessary fruit that demonstrates we truly believe. If someone claims to have faith yet they have no works at all (given time to produce them) then they demonstrate they have an empty profession of faith/dead faith and not genuine faith, but that is still a far cry from saying we are saved by works.

If you're not willing to do that, it means you don't agree with it and that is incorrect theology ---- the study of God.
The proper balance is man is saved through faith and not by works, yet genuine faith is evidenced by works.

GOD DEMANDS OBEDIENCE.
Obedience is not forced or legalistic for genuine believers.

Show me one verse that gives even a hint of God NOT demanding obedience.
Yet how many of us are perfectly obedient, 100% of the time? So where does that leave us? What is the dividing line between heaven and hell? Sinless, perfect obedience/no sinless, perfect obedience? OR believes in Him/does not believe in Him? What did Jesus say in John 3:18?