The police officer's name is mohammed. I'd call that a clue.
The police officer's name is mohammed. I'd call that a clue.
OK OK... well the article should have said it was the other cop that provided all that info! Instead they said nothing! >.<
![]()
What Im hearing is he has had complaints before with women.Not sure if that is true or not. He fired from the car across his partner,according to reports. Bill O'Reilly came up on my FB feed and said this is about to be a big story. He said it was very unusual that the cops side of the story has not come out yet. Seems like this is about to be front page news. The lib press will try to bury it though.
The Level of Media and political interest in it is too high for it to fade away any time soon..
A law enforcement officer firing across the partner would normally only do that if a situation is out of control. A cop is not firing across his or her partner unless the option is worse.
I guess both parties are digging dirt about their adversaries as we speak. Don't be surprised if someone suddenly claims she posed a threat to the officers, or that he was a fifth columnist.
What Im hearing is he has had complaints before with women.Not sure if that is true or not. He fired from the car across his partner,according to reports. Bill O'Reilly came up on my FB feed and said this is about to be a big story. He said it was very unusual that the cops side of the story has not come out yet. Seems like this is about to be front page news. The lib press will try to bury it though.
It doesn't matter what colour he is
nor what colour she is
What matters is :
WHY didn't he turn on his camera?
Did he murder her? If he did: Will he get away with it? (NOT because he is black but because he is a cop)
You are right. Never let one of them cover your (something).
I'll sit on this one a little longer. This may be another Minnesota case in which I'll have to trust the jury.
Pardon my language, but if he sat there in the passenger seat **edited** his Glock...well...a Glock will fire if you pull the trigger, safety arrangements or not.
Other rumors claims he was firing several shots, so I guess his finger just had a busy night.
I heard a news statement of the radio from an officer investigating the incident saying, "The body cameras were not on at the time because nothing had happened yet."
That doesn't make sense, if nothing had happened yet, then why did he shoot her?
questions are asked but he doesn't want to talk.