Losing Salvation ?!

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
P

PHart

Guest
what is bad and messed up is the blending of faith, works, grace, created by plucking verses out, and then building theology around them. like you do with Hebrews 6 4-6.
All you have to do is show in the Bible where it says the necessity to continue in the exact same believing that started when you first believed in order to stay saved is a damnable work of self-righteousness. Do that and we can end this and a multitude of other threads in this forum about losing salvation. You will be right, I will be wrong, and I will publically declare that I was wrong in it's own thread that everybody can find and read. And I will go away and never utter another word about losing one's salvation through unbelief.
 
P

PHart

Guest
what is bad and messed up is the blending of faith, works, grace, created by plucking verses out, and then building theology around them. like you do with Hebrews 6 4-6.

you do understand that Hebrews was a letter, written as a letter, with chapters and verses added hundreds of years later. you know that right?
Oh, you are going to address the point I brought up in my post, right?

Why is it impossible for the unbeliever who never believed who rejects the gospel to later repent and accept Jesus, per Hebrews 6:4-6. If that's what many Christians say the passage means, why do unbelievers only get one crack at repentance?

Obviously, that interpretation of the passage is absurd. It's obviously not about people who never believed not getting a second chance to come to Christ after passing up the one and only chance God gives them. It makes much more sense that the author is talking to and about his audience--saved, sanctified true believers being tempted to abandon the justification they have received in Christ and going back to a so-called justification by the law. There is no return possible for the person who tramples on the blood of Christ that sanctified them (unbelievers have not been sanctified by the blood of Jesus) by going back to the law, or anything else, for justification.
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
13,570
9,090
113
Well I'm glad you're not playing the 'judging' card like I did in my post.
.

I'm sorry if that comes off as judging you brother. That was a concrete observation. That MANY of your ideas and posts draw from Hebrews 6 and 10. Surely you are not unaware of this.

Relax brother. God gave you the faith to believe. He is NOT going to take away that gift. You have imbibed the gift. It has made you a NEW creation. You can't unmake what God has created. Once you truly embrace that, THEN you can truly live FOR Him. It will free you.

And NOT free you to sin OR want to sin. You will be so grateful and full of love for WHO He is, and WHAT He has done for you, that the Holy Spirit will ONLY INCREASE your desire to please Him.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,371
113
Some people believe, that after accepting Jesus as a savior, one become children of God. No matter what you do not change your status as a child. You can kill, rape, rob the bank every day, you still His son and go to heaven.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,280
6,654
113
All you have to do is show in the Bible where it says the necessity to continue in the exact same believing that started when you first believed in order to stay saved is a damnable work of self-righteousness. Do that and we can end this and a multitude of other threads in this forum about losing salvation. You will be right, I will be wrong, and I will publically declare that I was wrong in it's own thread that everybody can find and read. And I will go away and never utter another word about losing one's salvation through unbelief.
something else that would stop a lot of these debates- operating with the understanding that not everyone who claims to be a believer is one. and it is NOT our place to judge who's in and who's out.

it is our place to speak the truth.
 
P

PHart

Guest

So they ARE saved. They ARE a child of God.


If I understand you correctly, you are saying the SAVED person, who IS a child of God can somehow, by their own will, disavow that they were EVER born?
Not disavow, but simply not care about being born again anymore. That rejection of Christ--that unbelief--may take on the form of them saying "I don't think it was ever real to begin with, so I left it", or they simply find their old lives of sin more appealing and so abandon the forgiveness of God for that reason.

But in the end, either one does end up with them being incapable of believing/trusting in the gospel anymore. Charles Templeton is a classic example. After his departure from the faith, he lamented the fact that he had to convince himself the gospel was true, yet he also said he "missed Jesus". He is our living, public example of Hebrew 6:4-6/ Hebrews 10:26-31. There is no coming back for the person who has been sanctified by Jesus in a genuine salvation, but who then willfully and knowingly walks away from Christ. God does not allow it.



Again. The person was born anew. Is a sheep. Somehow rejects that he IS a sheep and morphs into a goat?
No. He simply doesn't want or care to be a sheep anymore. But he may, and probably will, convince himself in some weird reasoning that he is still okay with God. If you talk to enough unbelievers as I have, you will know this is the common path for the ex/unbelieving. They still attempt to rationalize some kind of saving saving relationship with the God they hate and do not want to serve. Few come right out and simply say, "I know the gospel is real, but I love sin more than I do righteousness."


Again. A person is a cucumber. Is Baptized (really the same term used to describe a cucumber being dipped into a vinegar solution to become a pickle) by the Holy Spirit, and becomes a pickle, and then somehow by it's own will becomes a cucumber again?
Yes, I know. It's impossible for you to see that the born again experience is simply having the Holy Spirit come into you and that it's not a brand new person being created, but simply a 'new' you by virtue of God's presence being right in your inner being coaching you into a new way of thinking and acting. I blame the church for portraying the born again experience as if a new and separate creation has been made with his own birth certificate and substance which can not be denied or reversed like a natural baby's birth.

You see, the church is business. It has to sell to stay in existence. Preachers just don't go, "oh well, no one's here to hear and cherish the true word of God today, so there's no money in the bucket to pay my salary this week." No. Instead they make sure they speak and perform in a way that tickles your worldly appetites so you'll fill the pews and make sure he gets paid that week. This has been going on for centuries. That's why I blame the leadership for the bad state we're in right now. They are the ultimate blame, for not teaching the truth.



Can't you see how silly it is to believe one day you were Born again, a NEW creation, and then by your will, UNBORN
yourself?
Yes, it's so hard to imagine that the Holy Spirit can move out of a person as simply and as easily as he moved in, lol. You're only 'new' because the Holy Spirit is in you, not because you're a new and separate entity created by God that can't be denied as existing or having ever existed, like a new baby born into your natural family.
 
Last edited:

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,770
113
And I will go away and never utter another word about losing one's salvation through unbelief.
All you have to say is that this is an interesting hypothetical. It's like the hypothetical that a baby can be unborn and returned to his mother's womb.
 
P

PHart

Guest
Some people believe, that after accepting Jesus as a savior, one become children of God. No matter what you do not change your status as a child. You can kill, rape, rob the bank every day, you still His son and go to heaven.
Did you know that the Bible says murders do not have eternal life in them?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Did you know that the Bible says murders do not have eternal life in them?
guess we can count David out, (I know, you will say he repented, he is still a murderer)

did you you know that the Bible says those who break the least of the law are found guilty of the whole?

Which if this is true, (and it is) we are all law breakers, and thus could not have eternal life in us, because we are all just as guilty as David, whether we killed anyone or not.
 
P

PHart

Guest
something else that would stop a lot of these debates- operating with the understanding that not everyone who claims to be a believer is one. and it is NOT our place to judge who's in and who's out.

it is our place to speak the truth.
Did you know that Jesus himself gives us the criteria for whether or not to consider someone a believer, or not? And John says that people who continue in sin and and are not characterized by obedience to God are not born again. And yet the PC church of today says we are not allowed to 'judge' believer from unbeliever.

We're in a big mess. We simply do not know what the Bible says. And what we think we do know has been interpreted for us by a leadership more interested in keeping the pews full and them earning a paycheck than teaching the difficult truths of the Bible.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
All you have to say is that this is an interesting hypothetical. It's like the hypothetical that a baby can be unborn and returned to his mother's womb.

be careful, Nicodemus used that, and people have been preaching we have to be baptized in water to be born again ever since.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Did you know that Jesus himself gives us the criteria for whether or not to consider someone a believer, or not? And John says that people who continue in sin and and are not characterized by obedience to God are not born again. And yet the PC church of today says we are not allowed to 'judge' believer from unbeliever.

We're in a big mess. We simply do not know what the Bible says. And what we think we do know has been interpreted for us by a leadership more interested in keeping the pews full and them earning a paycheck than teaching the difficult truths of the Bible.
thats interesting

so when say they were never saved, because of your criteria, we get judged, but now you get to use that excuse?

When Peter denied Christ was he lost? When Peter treated gentils wrong, was he lost?

how can you tell an unbeliever if you can not even tell who is a true believer? You can't
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,401
113
guess we can count David out, (I know, you will say he repented, he is still a murderer)

did you you know that the Bible says those who break the least of the law are found guilty of the whole?

Which if this is true, (and it is) we are all law breakers, and thus could not have eternal life in us, because we are all just as guilty as David, whether we killed anyone or not.
They say David was not saved like we are......even though he speaks of it in the present tense......
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,280
6,654
113
Did you know that Jesus himself gives us the criteria for whether or not to consider someone a believer, or not? And John says that people who continue in sin and and are not characterized by obedience to God are not born again. And yet the PC church of today says we are not allowed to 'judge' believer from unbeliever.

We're in a big mess. We simply do not know what the Bible says. And what we think we do know has been interpreted for us by a leadership more interested in keeping the pews full and them earning a paycheck than teaching the difficult truths of the Bible.
I know the Bible very well, thank you. I know how to rightly divide it.

now, judge not, you shall not be judged. take the plank out of your own eye.....James said there is one lawmaker and one judge ( Chapter 4 ) also- Romans 14. but that's just off the top my head. if you need some more , i'll look them up. but, I think I have posted enough to prove your judgemental stance wrong.
 

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
I don't know about others here, but I do not waiver, and I am not confused about the truth of God's word. I learn from the Holy Spirit himself with confidence.,and he teaches the truth. His truth in me is compared by those things that are not true. I stopped listening to preachers telling something different from each other, and made up my mind that there is no better preacher or teacher than the Holy Ghost. He has never let me down as he confirms the truth in me. endure sound doctrine, stop trying to figure out whose right, go to Jesus for your answers. and you will know who is telling the truth.
 
P

PHart

Guest
guess we can count David out, (I know, you will say he repented, he is still a murderer)
That is how David discovered justification by faith apart from works. A murderer is what David used to be.



did you you know that the Bible says those who break the least of the law are found guilty of the whole?

Which if this is true, (and it is) we are all law breakers, and thus could not have eternal life in us, because we are all just as guilty as David, whether we killed anyone or not.
That's the distorted understanding of James' teaching that you were taught. There are things in the law that I have not violated. Just because I have violated other things doesn't make it so I have violated the things in the law that I have not, lol.

The things that I have violated means I can not boast of being a law keeper. You have to keep all of the law to make that boast (You can only be justified by the law if you keep ALL of the law). He's not saying you are also guilty of having committed a murder if you steal an apple, lol. That's a joke.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
That is how David discovered justification by faith apart from works. A murderer is what David used to be.
Nope, David was called a man after Gods heart when haws a child in the fields, he was chosen by God then, David Nderstd justfication by faith better than you do, he proved that in high s confession in the psalms, when understood sacrifice and burnt offering God did not desire.


That's the distorted understanding of James' teaching that you were taught. There are things in the law that I have not violated. Just because I have violated other things doesn't make it so I have violated the things in the law that I have not, lol.

The things that I have violated means I can not boast of being a law keeper. You have to keep all of the law to make that boast (You can only be justified by the law if you keep ALL of the law). He's not saying you are also guilty of having committed a murder if you steal an apple, lol. That's a joke.
Actually it is you who have been thought wrong,

james made a statement of fact, if you commit the smallest sin, your as guilty as if you commuted the largest sin, when it comes to eternity and out standing we all stand condemned, not just the murderer,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
P

PHart

Guest
I know the Bible very well, thank you. I know how to rightly divide it.

now, judge not, you shall not be judged. take the plank out of your own eye.....James said there is one lawmaker and one judge ( Chapter 4 ) also- Romans 14. but that's just off the top my head. if you need some more , i'll look them up. but, I think I have posted enough to prove your judgemental stance wrong.
What you are not entitled to do is condemn.

But you are certainly entitled to judge a person to be an unbeliever (Matthew 18:17, Matthwe 7:20).
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
What you are not entitled to do is condemn.

But you are certainly entitled to judge a person to be an unbeliever (Matthew 18:17, Matthwe 7:20).
thats sad, where do you get this stuff from? I hope you heard it from someone and did not come up with it yourself

matt 18 says let him be to you like a heathen, it did not say judge him, or that he was a heathen,

matt 7 says you will know who Gods children are by their fruit, it does not say you can judge anyone, or that you will know who are not gods children,