No jaybird, you don't know what an argument from silence means. Here is what you originally said, "why is there not one time in the bible where the Most High is refereed to as a "they"? three persons is a they right?? always a "He" and always one."
So let me explain it to you. And btw, don't think I didn't notice how you changed the subject to this "witness" business. An argument from silence is where the conclusion is based on the absence of evidence, rather than the existence of evidence.
That is like saying, "why does not anyone in the book of Acts teach that Jesus Christ is God Almighty or that anyone in the book of Acts stated Jesus is God?" If in the Bible at another place like at the gospel of John where Jesus is identified as God then that would be evidence. What your doing is "isolating" one book, i.e Acts and saying "You see, Jesus is not God because the book of Acts does not say so."
Therefore, you logic us flawed because only positive assertions can possibly be proven. And since you made a negative assertion your the one that has to prove your assertion. Moreover, any rational thinking person would know this which you do not.
IN GOD THE SON,
bluto