Its doesn't matter how it was said, the fact is people perceive it wrong. [FONT="] [/FONT][FONT="]Adam[/FONT][FONT="] was the first human “[/FONT][FONT="]son[/FONT][FONT="] [/FONT][FONT="]of[/FONT][FONT="] [/FONT][FONT="]God[/FONT][FONT="]” by virtue [/FONT][FONT="]of[/FONT][FONT="] his creation by [/FONT][FONT="]God[/FONT][FONT="].Ge 2:7; Lu 3:38 [/FONT][FONT="]When he was condemned to death as a willful sinner and was evicted from [/FONT][FONT="]God[/FONT][FONT="]’s sanctuary in Eden, he was, in effect, disowned by [/FONT][FONT="]God[/FONT][FONT="] and lost his filial relationship with his heavenly Father.Ge 3:17-24[/FONT][FONT="]Those descended from him have been born with inherited sinful tendencies. Since they were born of one rejected by God, Adam’s descendants could not claim the relationship of being a son of God simply on the basis of birth. This is demonstrated by the apostle John’s words at John 1:12,13. He shows that those who received Christ Jesus, exercising faith in his name, were given “authority to become God’s children, . . . (being) born, not from blood or from a fleshly will or from man’s will, but from God.” Sonship in relation to God, therefore, is not viewed as something automatically received by all of Adam’s descendants at birth. This and other texts show that, since Adam’s fall into sin, it has required some special recognition by God for men to be designated as his “sons.” This is illustrated in his dealings with Israel.[/FONT]