The Seventh-day Adventist Church has, "historically" categorically rejected the Doctrine of the Atonement on the Cross...
....This can be confirmed by spending just a little bit of time in their archives of Doctrinal Statements.
….An example that's representative of the SDA historical doctrine:
"With such confusion as this to represent Christianity, it is no wonder that the heathen get a degraded
idea of God, as evinced in the reply of the Chinaman to the Jew, who was reviling his nationality. Thinking
to retort upon him as severely as possible -he replied: Ah I me know you ; you kill the Melican man's God." How much better it would be to accept the doctrine of the distinct individuality and -personality of the Father and the Son, confessing them " one" in heart, mind and purpose, and thus avoid the jargon of confusion always attendant upon erroneous doctrine. Another error, even more generally endorsed than any of the foregoing, is the doctrine of the atonement on the cross. This also furnishes another support for
Unitarianism. The Scriptures plainly teach that Christ died for all men. Now if his death on the cross was the atonement, then the sins of all men are atoned for, and all will be saved. The conclusion is unavoidable, and we deny the doctrine of the atonement on the cross, not because it leads to this belief, but because it is scripturally untrue, and then as an incentive for proclaiming its falsity we have the fact that it is a strong pillar for a destructive error". Sabbath Herald, August 29, 1665 No. 13
The above statement has been affirmed as recently as within the last 8 years.