Preterists - Put up or shutter up

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
This is just weird. Not true at all.
Death is only swallowed in victory when Jesus returns. The LAST enemy to be destroyed is death.
Paul makes this clear for us.
It says that men will seek to die and won't be able to. Who hasn't marveled over how that will be possible? I agree it's weird. :)
But I can't say it's not true because there it is in scripture.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
what are they? I never heard of preterism before I came to CC. I always called people by what they believed. Pre-mil vs Amil, Pre-trib, mid trib, or post trib.
Wow, I first heard about it (and violently opposed even the mention of it) way back in 1981 or 82.
 
May 11, 2014
936
39
0
It says that men will seek to die and won't be able to. Who hasn't marveled over how that will be possible? I agree it's weird. :)
But I can't say it's not true because there it is in scripture.
Wooden literalism right here. Listen; no one will be immortal unless they have glorified risen bodies in Christ Jesus.
Its like me saying "This flu is so bad I just want to die" yet im not immortal. Lets not get ridicilous here. Why am I even commenting on this. I am done here :D This is absurd.
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
Also, bogadile (good morning by the way!) I wouldn't say it would be death swallowed up in victory to WANT to die, being tortured by these things for 5 months and wanting to die to escape it but being unable to for 5 months.
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
Wooden literalism right here. Listen; no one will be immortal unless they have glorified risen bodies in Christ Jesus.
Its like me saying "This flu is so bad I just want to die" yet im not immortal. Lets not get ridicilous here. Why am I even commenting on this. I am done here :D This is absurd.
Well then, give your opinion on what it means. :)
Do you see some other view of what it means to seek death but not be able to die for 5 months?
We're sharing our opinions here, so have at it. :)
 
May 11, 2014
936
39
0
Well then, give your opinion on what it means. :)
Do you see some other view of what it means to seek death but not be able to die for 5 months?
We're sharing our opinions here, so have at it. :)
I gave my opinion in the message that you quoted.

It is a good idea to interpret the unclear texts in light of the clear ones. The book of Revelation is highly symbolic. Whereas the letters of Paul are pretty straightforward, particularly 1 Corinthians 15 which discusses when Death ceases to be, and how that works out.
So I take the plain teachings of Paul Peter and Jesus and apply them to the book of Revelation, rather than adjusting the plain teachings to the book of Revelation.

That is my take on it.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
I think Willie will like your "I suggest." :)
Truthfully, I think all of us would benefit from actually coming right out and framing much of our speech with the use of qualifiers and disclaimers similar to that. At least, we would probably begin to learn more. (If I already know it all, you can't possibly teach [or even show] me anything......... because I will, then, be a person who "does not have ears to hear.")
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
This is just weird. Not true at all.
Death is only swallowed in victory when Jesus returns. The LAST enemy to be destroyed is death.
Paul makes this clear for us.
Death is only swallowed up when we are resurrected. And there is a new heaven and new earth. After the greaaat white throne judgment.

 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
I have to go and do some work. :mad:
Would like to stay here with you guys talking about this. I'll be back later to hear what you guys think. :)

Bear with, forgive and love one another. Love covers a multitude of sins. :)
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
Truthfully, I think all of us would benefit from actually coming right out and framing much of our speech with the use of qualifiers and disclaimers similar to that. At least, we would probably begin to learn more. (If I already know it all, you can't possibly teach [or even show] me anything......... because I will, then, be a person who "does not have ears to hear.")
Yes, we would all benefit from that!
And also, our cries of dumb, stupid, nonsense, etc., completely halt any hearing of what we think or have to say. No one will listen to a clanging gong. They'll just cover their ears because it's painful to listen to!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
oh, man, i'd have to write a book! lol

i am currently studying full preterism (thank you, Locutus for the tools :) ), but i think amil falls in the partial preterist camp.

basically, the amil position is that most, but not all things are yet fulfilled. from what i've read thus far, that's the major distinction between full and partial. we were raised in dispensational churches, but i can no longer see that view in the Scriptures.

you can call me amil, EG. i'll still like you, and i trust you'll still like me. see how this works, folks? no need to destroy friendships over eschatology. ;)

It does not matter how we interpret scripture prophesy, We will not go to hell if we get it wrong, and are still brother or sister if we disagree.

I always saw Amil as those who think Jesus returns at the end the millennium, hence the term A (after) Mill. so would not understand full preterism is any different. Would be interesting to learn what is different.
 
Nov 12, 2015
9,112
823
113
I gave my opinion in the message that you quoted.

It is a good idea to interpret the unclear texts in light of the clear ones. The book of Revelation is highly symbolic. Whereas the letters of Paul are pretty straightforward, particularly 1 Corinthians 15 which discusses when Death ceases to be, and how that works out.
So I take the plain teachings of Paul Peter and Jesus and apply them to the book of Revelation, rather than adjusting the plain teachings to the book of Revelation.

That is my take on it.
Okay, then give us your opinion on what the symbolic meaning of the verse is. :)
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Wow, I first heard about it (and violently opposed even the mention of it) way back in 1981 or 82.

The people I always spoke to, and books I read always called it amil, or After millennium, not preterism. I guess maybe I love the topic, but hate discussing it because of all the hate and attacks against people who disagree in this subject. Especially in BDF, I can hardly take more than a day or two. then I get so disgusted with all the hate on a non salvic issue, I leave.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0

The people I always spoke to, and books I read always called it amil, or After millennium, not preterism. I guess maybe I love the topic, but hate discussing it because of all the hate and attacks against people who disagree in this subject. Especially in BDF, I can hardly take more than a day or two. then I get so disgusted with all the hate on a non salvic issue, I leave.
I guess I would be labeled a Preterist because I really do believe most of Revelation comes straight out of many of John's impressions of the OT prophecies, and that he wrote directly to the 1st-Century men sitting in the East Asian churches along the trade route those 7 cities were built on. And that he was mainly describing the beginning of the kingdom of Christ's rule and His defeat of the Jewish system of sacrifices.

I just can't read it as a Crystal Ball written for people who would be born 2,000 years in the future. If that were the case, I know there must have been a bunch of local congregations sitting there wondering why in the world they received this letter full of craziness they couldn't make head nor tails of.
 

notmyown

Senior Member
May 26, 2016
4,927
1,271
113

It does not matter how we interpret scripture prophesy, We will not go to hell if we get it wrong, and are still brother or sister if we disagree.

I always saw Amil as those who think Jesus returns at the end the millennium, hence the term A (after) Mill. so would not understand full preterism is any different. Would be interesting to learn what is different.
that's right, bro! :)

Greek prefix "A" meaning no, like when i would tell the doc the kids were afebrile (no fever), and millennium = no literal millennium. so we don't believe the 1000 years is meant to be literal.

one really, really needs good Old Testament underpinning for The Revelation. imo, The Revelation was written to encourage holiness in God's people, to comfort us in all ages, and above all, to show the beauty of Christ.
 

J7

Banned
Apr 2, 2017
1,915
13
0
I never even realized that Amillennialism and PostMillennialism existed.

Amillennialism in Christian eschatology involves the rejection of the belief that Jesus will have a literal, thousand-year-long, physical reign on the earth. This rejection contrasts with premillennial and some postmillennial interpretations of chapter 20 of the Book of Revelation.

postmillennialism

  • the doctrine that the Second Coming of Christ will be the culmination of the prophesied millennium of blessedness.


Postmillennialism looks very odd. Then you would know the date of Jesus's return.

Amillennialism is indeed the other name for Preterism.
 
Last edited:
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
I guess I would be labeled a Preterist because I really do believe most of Revelation comes straight out of many of John's impressions of the OT prophecies, and that he wrote directly to the 1st-Century men sitting in the East Asian churches along the trade route those 7 cities were built on. And that he was mainly describing the beginning of the kingdom of Christ's rule and His defeat of the Jewish system of sacrifices.

I just can't read it as a Crystal Ball written for people who would be born 2,000 years in the future. If that were the case, I know there must have been a bunch of local congregations sitting there wondering why in the world they received this letter full of craziness they couldn't make head nor tails of.
I see it different, I see that literal translation would not lend to fulfillment, This I could not see it that way, And for this reason I question all preterism or amil beliefs (not judge, just question).

I also look to the past. Daniel was given prophesies some of which would not be fulfilled for centuries. Same with many of the other prophets. so we do have historical and biblical precedence of prophesy given to people who could not understand it (imagine what Daniel thought when he was given his prophesies concerning the kingdoms of men, and the coming off the messiah, and the messiah getting killed, or Talk about crazy! or Ezekiel prophesy of the dry bones, or the prophesies which show Israel no longer existing as a nation living in her land (not fulfilled until 70 AD) They must have thought same way 1st century people thought of Revelation. or even some of Jesus words, like in Matt 24. which were impossible in his day.

to me, John opens up daniels prophesies more for us to understand. Muck like Daniel was first given a basic prophesy (ch 2) then more detailed prophesy (ch 7) then even greater details of a few off the kingdoms (8-12) with a specific prophesy concerning messiah and the end in chapter 9, To me revelation is the NT daniel.
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
that's right, bro! :)

Greek prefix "A" meaning no, like when i would tell the doc the kids were afebrile (no fever), and millennium = no literal millennium. so we don't believe the 1000 years is meant to be literal.

one really, really needs good Old Testament underpinning for The Revelation. imo, The Revelation was written to encourage holiness in God's people, to comfort us in all ages, and above all, to show the beauty of Christ.
Truer words were never spoken! And few of us (even commentators) have nearly the OT awareness and understanding that the men who received those letters had, and, thus, were immediately able to easily associate and relate John's words right back to all the history each of those Jews knew by heart. He wrote about things that would mean something to them... but, they would not instinctively mean anything to us. We have to do something I am convinced they never had to do.... We have to speculate and guess... and then go on assumptions.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
that's right, bro! :)

Greek prefix "A" meaning no, like when i would tell the doc the kids were afebrile (no fever), and millennium = no literal millennium. so we don't believe the 1000 years is meant to be literal.

one really, really needs good Old Testament underpinning for The Revelation. imo, The Revelation was written to encourage holiness in God's people, to comfort us in all ages, and above all, to show the beauty of Christ.
I agree, but I think it is also a warning to people in that age, Much like OT prophets gave warning to people who lived centuries after they were dead and gone.

No millenium, I can see that I always thought A meant (post) Thanks for that info makes sense now..lol
 

notmyown

Senior Member
May 26, 2016
4,927
1,271
113
Truer words were never spoken! And few of us (even commentators) have nearly the OT awareness and understanding that the men who received those letters had, and, thus, were immediately able to easily associate and relate John's words right back to all the history each of those Jews knew by heart. He wrote about things that would mean something to them... but, they would not instinctively mean anything to us. We have to do something I am convinced they never had to do.... We have to speculate and guess... and then go on assumptions.
orrr.... we can try to study and ask God for help in understanding Ezekiel, Jeremiah, Ezra... y'know, basically the Law and the Prophets. lol

but i agree, at least some of this is speculative. brilliant minds (who don't agree) have looked into it... for millennia! ;)