September 11th, 2001

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Y

Yahweh_is_gracious

Guest
Just a question...and yes I probably mean this to be trolling, but it's a valid question I think:

Why is 9/11 a polar topic? Either people believe the 9/11 commission report OR they are clear on the other side of the topic and are derided as a "9/11 truther"? What if both positions are wrong and the facts are somewhere in the middle? Not that I've had many conversations about 9/11 with people, but I can't recall that I've ever heard anybody talk about it that wasn't firmly in either camp, and the entire middle ground was just ignored. Just food for thought...and to antagonize you if you want to choose to be offended by what I've said.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
13,050
1,161
113
Just a question...and yes I probably mean this to be trolling, but it's a valid question I think:

Why is 9/11 a polar topic? Either people believe the 9/11 commission report OR they are clear on the other side of the topic and are derided as a "9/11 truther"? What if both positions are wrong and the facts are somewhere in the middle? Not that I've had many conversations about 9/11 with people, but I can't recall that I've ever heard anybody talk about it that wasn't firmly in either camp, and the entire middle ground was just ignored. Just food for thought...and to antagonize you if you want to choose to be offended by what I've said.
I don't know but I actually dread every anniversary of 9/11. Because the truthers trolls always come crawling out of the woodwork with their asinine conspiracy theories. I almost wish we could just forget about it.
 
Jan 27, 2015
2,691
367
83
Just a question...and yes I probably mean this to be trolling, but it's a valid question I think:

Why is 9/11 a polar topic? Either people believe the 9/11 commission report OR they are clear on the other side of the topic and are derided as a "9/11 truther"? What if both positions are wrong and the facts are somewhere in the middle? Not that I've had many conversations about 9/11 with people, but I can't recall that I've ever heard anybody talk about it that wasn't firmly in either camp, and the entire middle ground was just ignored. Just food for thought...and to antagonize you if you want to choose to be offended by what I've said.
What's the middle ground's theory? I certainly haven't heard it.
 
Y

Yahweh_is_gracious

Guest
What's the middle ground's theory? I certainly haven't heard it.
I don't know that I have either, but I also don't pay much attention. Perhaps it's just me, but I question everything - so naturally I was skeptical of the 9/11 commission report given the US Gov's reputation of writing some tome of a report to stand as the "official" account of what happened, how it happened and why it happened.

*cough, cough, magic bullet, Kennedy Assassination, cough, cough*

However, just because I don't think the 9/11 commission got it all right, that doesn't mean I drink the lunatic fringe Kool-Aid that talks about scalar weapons, holograms, or whatever falls out from connecting dots. So I'm wondering if maybe the "truth" is somewhere between the two polar opposites. It just seems to me, and not only on the 9/11 topic, but many others as well, people go into one of two camps as far from each other as possible and they neglect to ask questions that might lead them to the truth because they are so preoccupied with arguing at each other from their base camps.
 

Tommy379

Notorious Member
Jan 12, 2016
7,589
1,153
113
I don't know that I have either, but I also don't pay much attention. Perhaps it's just me, but I question everything - so naturally I was skeptical of the 9/11 commission report given the US Gov's reputation of writing some tome of a report to stand as the "official" account of what happened, how it happened and why it happened.

*cough, cough, magic bullet, Kennedy Assassination, cough, cough*

However, just because I don't think the 9/11 commission got it all right, that doesn't mean I drink the lunatic fringe Kool-Aid that talks about scalar weapons, holograms, or whatever falls out from connecting dots. So I'm wondering if maybe the "truth" is somewhere between the two polar opposites. It just seems to me, and not only on the 9/11 topic, but many others as well, people go into one of two camps as far from each other as possible and they neglect to ask questions that might lead them to the truth because they are so preoccupied with arguing at each other from their base camps.
Kennedy was murdered by Lee Harvey Oswald.
 
Y

Yahweh_is_gracious

Guest
Kennedy was murdered by Lee Harvey Oswald.
It was used as an example to show there has long been debate among Americans about things that are perceived as "big" in our history. I have no opinion about the events of 11/22/1963. It was long before my time.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
13,050
1,161
113
MythBusters were able to duplicate the so-called Magic Bullet
So it's actually plausible
 
P

pckts

Guest
You seem to be in favor of forcing your beliefs on others
America is a diverse country and everyone has the freedom to worship or not worship as they chiose. As per the Constitution
When we discuss our beliefs or what is right and wrong, the country you live in, it's constitution, and court system should not enter your mind or the dialogue.

You have developed this rhetoric so your Christian beliefs can be compatible with liberal agendas and you can maintain good relations with lgbtqrst+, other liberal groups, and the panel on CNN/FOX.

You would also hate to be on the outside with those people you detest that go against what is politically correct.
 
Apr 15, 2017
2,867
653
113
You seem to be in favor of forcing your beliefs on others
America is a diverse country and everyone has the freedom to worship or not worship as they chiose. As per the Constitution
That does not make sense seeing there is a higher power,that has laws on how the world should operate,and He says differently,that there is a certain behavior that the world is supposed to abide by,and to not acknowledge any religion,but Jesus Christ,and His truth,and told the Jews to not even tolerate the religions of other nations.

America cannot change that operation that God commands for the world,and then call it freedom.

For that is not freedom,but bondage according to God.

If God had to force America to do what is right,all religions would go out the door,and all immorality,and worldliness,would be a thing of the past,all money would be distributed to the poor and needy.

But some people want to act as if America,and the way they operate is freedom,and it is alright,and many believe it is tolerated by God.

They have their interpretation of freedom confused,for it sure is not the freedom of God,and America cannot say freedom,and override the operation of God on earth.

America even allows Satanism to be practiced,and then say freedom,and that is of God.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
13,050
1,161
113
That does not make sense seeing there is a higher power,that has laws on how the world should operate,and He says differently,that there is a certain behavior that the world is supposed to abide by,and to not acknowledge any religion,but Jesus Christ,and His truth,and told the Jews to not even tolerate the religions of other nations.

America cannot change that operation that God commands for the world,and then call it freedom.

For that is not freedom,but bondage according to God.

If God had to force America to do what is right,all religions would go out the door,and all immorality,and worldliness,would be a thing of the past,all money would be distributed to the poor and needy.

But some people want to act as if America,and the way they operate is freedom,and it is alright,and many believe it is tolerated by God.

They have their interpretation of freedom confused,for it sure is not the freedom of God,and America cannot say freedom,and override the operation of God on earth.

America even allows Satanism to be practiced,and then say freedom,and that is of God.
Congress shall make no law respecting one religion or establishing the free exercise thereof.
Satanism is protected under freedom of religion as per the Constitution. So is Islam or Buddhism or Scientology. I suppose you think the Constitution only applies to Christians.
We're not at the ocracy and we're never intended to be.
No where in the Bible are we instructed to spread Christianity by force
Some people will accept it and some won't
That's why God gives us free will
 
Sep 12, 2017
36
0
0
Re: 9/11 WTC - Biggest Gold Heist in History

Sure you can believe what you want..... you're still WRONG.
I have every right to my opinion that truthers are idiots.
Hands down, you need to shut up kid, you probably life about your age child, get out of here, I really didn't care about this topic in the first place and you don't make it any better, so shut and worship the big g, I honestly feel sorry for the Muslims then Americans at this point, when I look back at 9/11 now, we deserve it. I know, I will get criticised for this, but this is MY opinion and we live in a free country, I could curse you to heaven above, but I don't, please don't make this worse than it has to be. Stop correcting everything I say.
 
Jul 12, 2013
1,011
11
0
What Is The Impossible?

According to Wikipedia...

On September 11, 2001, 7 WTC was damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed. The debris also ignited fires, which continued to burn throughout the afternoon on lower floors of the building. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires, and the building collapsed completely at 5:21:10 pm, according to FEMA, while the 2008 NIST study placed the final collapse time at 5:20:52 pm.

And from Google search...

The South Tower collapsed at 9:59 am, less than an hour after being hit by the second hijacked airliner, and at 10:28 am the North Tower collapsed. Later that day, 7 World Trade Center collapsed at 5:21 pm from fires that had started when the North Tower collapsed.

[video=youtube;-jPzAakHPpk]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk[/video]


If I may pose a very simple question?

What is the possible and the impossible?


Is it possible that WTC 7 was rigged with explosives for a professionally orchestrated/controlled demolition in less than 12 hours with the ensuing chaos/confusion surrounding the first two tower collapses?

Is it possible that Larry SIlverstein slipped up on the official story that was to be presented?

Is it possible that certain documents, if left un-destroyed (read shredded), would have brought to light criminal activities perpetrated by Muslims, or rather, the USA, Inc. and it's affiliated politicians/corporations, not to mention the involvement of...?


"[WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal]

"Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service's largest field office with more than 200 employees. ..."All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building," according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran. [TechTV]

"Regardless of what the regulators say, they lost a ton of files," says Bill Singer, a New York securities lawyer, who says one case he had pending before the SEC quickly settled because so many of the original documents were destroyed. "In my opinion it was a wholesale loss of documents." [TheStreet]"



The Collapse of WTC 7: "A Wholesale Loss of Documents"


Perhaps we should also discuss the Pentagon?


Is it possible that someone made a 6.5 Trillion dollar accounting error?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/pentagon-cannot-account-for-6-5-trillion-dollars/5541244


Is it possible that websites like 911myths, 911review, and Snopes are bastions of truth and journalistic integrity?

9-11 Review: ERROR: 'Engine Parts From the Pentagon Crash Don't Match a 757'

Rumsfeld, 9/11 and $2.3 trillion

Pentagon Attack Faked


Is it possible that eye-witnesses had conflicting reports of what occurred?

9/11 Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts


There are many possibilities and impossibilities, there are speculations and debates, there are truths and lies, and there are also shills weaving disinformation expertly throughout...

The Weapons of Mass Distraction are the real threats in our world today. If one cannot effectively suppress the truth, then the only alternative is to flood the internet with easily disprovable conspiracy theories in order to label conspiracy theorists as...

I've come to the sad truth that no-one really cares, and if they did, they wouldn't do anything about it...even if they could, which they cannot. I'm sorry to be the bearer of unpleasant tidings but...the battle for minds is already won, and the truthers didn't prevail.

Even if George W. Bush came right out out and told everyone that 9/11 was an inside job, and that he took an active part in the murders/thefts...no one would do a thing about it except discuss it in endless committee for a few years before doing absolutely nothing.


If you'll permit me a cliche?

"The Jedi are all but extinct, the Republic has fallen and in their wake, the Galactic Empire has engulfed the far reaches of the galaxy in fear."


Remember...and never forget...

"The best lies are based on truth, at least in part."

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”


Peace.
 
Apr 15, 2017
2,867
653
113
Congress shall make no law respecting one religion or establishing the free exercise thereof.
Satanism is protected under freedom of religion as per the Constitution. So is Islam or Buddhism or Scientology. I suppose you think the Constitution only applies to Christians.
We're not at the ocracy and we're never intended to be.
No where in the Bible are we instructed to spread Christianity by force
Some people will accept it and some won't
That's why God gives us free will
I can agree that God did give us free will,and that we cannot force Christianity upon anyone,but we still have to enforce His ways,not set up a nation,and say freedom,and then go against His ways,for that is not freedom,for it is only freedom from a fleshy perspective,and not a godly perspective,although it can give opportunity for some to see the truth,but for the most part in the wrong,and many people deceived,and lost,by the way they operate,which is certainly not the way of God.

It is wrong point blank,and it is not a valid,and reality perspective,for God did give us free will,but you do not set up a nation,and operate against the will of God,and say it is freedom,and alright,for then it is a nation that does not do the will of God,but says freewill that is not valid,and people will be immoral,and who are people to say freewill,when God says do not operate that way.

People are supposed to obey the commandments of God.

God says freewill,but has commandments of how the world should operate,and we better go by those commandments.

A nation is not supposed to say freewill,and then go against the commandments of God.

For God calls the shots,not people.

People do not say freewill,and do what you please,but they are to obey the commandments of God.

God says freewill,and nations better obey what is His operation for the world.

Freewill to do sin,and wrongdoing,and say it is freedom,is not freedom,and not right,and not of God.

America cannot override the operation of God,and say freedom,and let people act in ways that are not of God,for we are always to obey God,and His commandments.

God gave us freewill to choose salvation,or not,and to live how we want,which has to do with salvation,or not.

But we are always to obey His commandments,and enforce them,and display them,not intentionally set up a nation that gives freedoms that go against God,and His ways,if they want to pursue that without repercussion from that nation,for freewill does not come from people that can cause corruption,but they are always to put forth the ways of God,and nothing else.

America is not operating within the confines of God's will by saying freewill for people,and ways that are not of God,and think that God would want a nation to operate that way.

Not people giving freewill that goes against God,for that is not the freewill that God is putting forth that would go against His ways coming from people,for people are only to put forth the ways of God,and His commandments,and that only.

You do not intentionally say freedom that goes against God,and think God tolerates it.

You put forth the ways of God,and that only,not put forth people can act the way they want,and that is freewill and of God,for it is not of God,for then you are intentionally putting forth immorality,and sin,and false religions,and ways that are not of God.

God gives us freewill,not people gives freewill that causes people to act immoral,and following false religions,and being worldly,for we obey God,and put that forth,and that is it.

America cannot override God,even if they have a constitution,which by the way will be voided out in the future when the nations come together,for it must change to be adaptable when the nations come together,for their constitution will not be compatible.

For the constitution is not iron clad,for this is people that put it forth,so it can be altered,and change dramatically.

Which on the back of the dollar bill,announcing the conception of a new order of the ages,and out of many,one,and the world trade center,New York,and the United Nations headquarters,New York,and after WW1,League of Nations,and after WW2,United Nations,and the purpose of America is to cause the nations to come together,and do people think the constitution will not change,but yes it will.

For America is looking at the world,and many nations are in the plan,and the ethnic diversity,and religious diversity,and the way America operates is all for the purpose of showing the world that all people can get along despite their differences,in the hopes the bringing the nations together,and then the constitution means nothing in its prior condition.

For that is the purpose of America to bring the nations together,and to collapse,and bring the power to Europe,as they join them.

For a nation cannot say freedom,and then go against the ways of God,for then it is not really freedom,but some mischief is going on,which we will see in the future.
 
P

pckts

Guest
Re: What Is The Impossible?

According to Wikipedia...

On September 11, 2001, 7 WTC was damaged by debris when the nearby North Tower of the World Trade Center collapsed. The debris also ignited fires, which continued to burn throughout the afternoon on lower floors of the building. The building's internal fire suppression system lacked water pressure to fight the fires, and the building collapsed completely at 5:21:10 pm, according to FEMA, while the 2008 NIST study placed the final collapse time at 5:20:52 pm.

And from Google search...

The South Tower collapsed at 9:59 am, less than an hour after being hit by the second hijacked airliner, and at 10:28 am the North Tower collapsed. Later that day, 7 World Trade Center collapsed at 5:21 pm from fires that had started when the North Tower collapsed.

If I may pose a very simple question?

What is the possible and the impossible?


Is it possible that WTC 7 was rigged with explosives for a professionally orchestrated/controlled demolition in less than 12 hours with the ensuing chaos/confusion surrounding the first two tower collapses?

Is it possible that Larry SIlverstein slipped up on the official story that was to be presented?

Is it possible that certain documents, if left un-destroyed (read shredded), would have brought to light criminal activities perpetrated by Muslims, or rather, the USA, Inc. and it's affiliated politicians/corporations, not to mention the involvement of...?


"[WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal]

"Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service's largest field office with more than 200 employees. ..."All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building," according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran. [TechTV]

"Regardless of what the regulators say, they lost a ton of files," says Bill Singer, a New York securities lawyer, who says one case he had pending before the SEC quickly settled because so many of the original documents were destroyed. "In my opinion it was a wholesale loss of documents." [TheStreet]"



The Collapse of WTC 7: "A Wholesale Loss of Documents"


Perhaps we should also discuss the Pentagon?


Is it possible that someone made a 6.5 Trillion dollar accounting error?

https://www.globalresearch.ca/pentagon-cannot-account-for-6-5-trillion-dollars/5541244


Is it possible that websites like 911myths, 911review, and Snopes are bastions of truth and journalistic integrity?

9-11 Review: ERROR: 'Engine Parts From the Pentagon Crash Don't Match a 757'

Rumsfeld, 9/11 and $2.3 trillion

Pentagon Attack Faked


Is it possible that eye-witnesses had conflicting reports of what occurred?

9/11 Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts


There are many possibilities and impossibilities, there are speculations and debates, there are truths and lies, and there are also shills weaving disinformation expertly throughout...

The Weapons of Mass Distraction are the real threats in our world today. If one cannot effectively suppress the truth, then the only alternative is to flood the internet with easily disprovable conspiracy theories in order to label conspiracy theorists as...

I've come to the sad truth that no-one really cares, and if they did, they wouldn't do anything about it...even if they could, which they cannot. I'm sorry to be the bearer of unpleasant tidings but...the battle for minds is already won, and the truthers didn't prevail.

Even if George W. Bush came right out out and told everyone that 9/11 was an inside job, and that he took an active part in the murders/thefts...no one would do a thing about it except discuss it in endless committee for a few years before doing absolutely nothing.


If you'll permit me a cliche?

"The Jedi are all but extinct, the Republic has fallen and in their wake, the Galactic Empire has engulfed the far reaches of the galaxy in fear."


Remember...and never forget...

"The best lies are based on truth, at least in part."

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”


Peace.
And you have the BBC announcing Tower 7 fell 20 minutes before it did, with it still standing in plain view as they broadcasted.

[video=youtube;ltP2t9nq9fI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltP2t9nq9fI[/video]
 
H

Huckleberry

Guest
Hate Much?

I don't think there's any group of people that I detest more than 9 11 truthers.They are an insult to human intelligence.
9/11 truthers are a testament to the power of collective stupidity
I despise 9/11 truthers almost as bad as I despise anti-vaxxers. I believe internet meme and clickbait culture is contributing to the collective idiocy of humanity.
As I said in the OP, I felt it was more than Islamic
terrorism on the very day of September 11th, 2001.
My first child was born in '96, and I chose neither to
vaccinate that child, nor any of my subsequent children.
Also, I never owned a computer or had any online presence whatsoever until 2004.
Guess I was stupid before stupid was cool.
 

Tommy379

Notorious Member
Jan 12, 2016
7,589
1,153
113
Re: 9/11 WTC - Biggest Gold Heist in History

Hands down, you need to shut up kid, you probably life about your age child, get out of here, I really didn't care about this topic in the first place and you don't make it any better, so shut and worship the big g, I honestly feel sorry for the Muslims then Americans at this point, when I look back at 9/11 now, we deserve it. I know, I will get criticised for this, but this is MY opinion and we live in a free country, I could curse you to heaven above, but I don't, please don't make this worse than it has to be. Stop correcting everything I say.
You join the site 3 days ago, make 35 post, and demand others to leave the site and shut up.

I'm willing to give you my address if you would like to make me shut up.
A little advice, when you tell someone to shut up, you should be prepared to make them.
Don't ever tell someone something you can't back up.
You now post your opinion that 2978 Americans deserved to be murdered by muslims. That's your opinion..... fine, but get some help for that problem you have.
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
13,050
1,161
113
I can agree that God did give us free will,and that we cannot force Christianity upon anyone,but we still have to enforce His ways,not set up a nation,and say freedom,and then go against His ways,for that is not freedom,for it is only freedom from a fleshy perspective,and not a godly perspective,although it can give opportunity for some to see the truth,but for the most part in the wrong,and many people deceived,and lost,by the way they operate,which is certainly not the way of God.

It is wrong point blank,and it is not a valid,and reality perspective,for God did give us free will,but you do not set up a nation,and operate against the will of God,and say it is freedom,and alright,for then it is a nation that does not do the will of God,but says freewill that is not valid,and people will be immoral,and who are people to say freewill,when God says do not operate that way.

People are supposed to obey the commandments of God.

God says freewill,but has commandments of how the world should operate,and we better go by those commandments.

A nation is not supposed to say freewill,and then go against the commandments of God.

For God calls the shots,not people.

People do not say freewill,and do what you please,but they are to obey the commandments of God.

God says freewill,and nations better obey what is His operation for the world.

Freewill to do sin,and wrongdoing,and say it is freedom,is not freedom,and not right,and not of God.

America cannot override the operation of God,and say freedom,and let people act in ways that are not of God,for we are always to obey God,and His commandments.

God gave us freewill to choose salvation,or not,and to live how we want,which has to do with salvation,or not.

But we are always to obey His commandments,and enforce them,and display them,not intentionally set up a nation that gives freedoms that go against God,and His ways,if they want to pursue that without repercussion from that nation,for freewill does not come from people that can cause corruption,but they are always to put forth the ways of God,and nothing else.

America is not operating within the confines of God's will by saying freewill for people,and ways that are not of God,and think that God would want a nation to operate that way.

Not people giving freewill that goes against God,for that is not the freewill that God is putting forth that would go against His ways coming from people,for people are only to put forth the ways of God,and His commandments,and that only.

You do not intentionally say freedom that goes against God,and think God tolerates it.

You put forth the ways of God,and that only,not put forth people can act the way they want,and that is freewill and of God,for it is not of God,for then you are intentionally putting forth immorality,and sin,and false religions,and ways that are not of God.

God gives us freewill,not people gives freewill that causes people to act immoral,and following false religions,and being worldly,for we obey God,and put that forth,and that is it.

America cannot override God,even if they have a constitution,which by the way will be voided out in the future when the nations come together,for it must change to be adaptable when the nations come together,for their constitution will not be compatible.

For the constitution is not iron clad,for this is people that put it forth,so it can be altered,and change dramatically.

Which on the back of the dollar bill,announcing the conception of a new order of the ages,and out of many,one,and the world trade center,New York,and the United Nations headquarters,New York,and after WW1,League of Nations,and after WW2,United Nations,and the purpose of America is to cause the nations to come together,and do people think the constitution will not change,but yes it will.

For America is looking at the world,and many nations are in the plan,and the ethnic diversity,and religious diversity,and the way America operates is all for the purpose of showing the world that all people can get along despite their differences,in the hopes the bringing the nations together,and then the constitution means nothing in its prior condition.

For that is the purpose of America to bring the nations together,and to collapse,and bring the power to Europe,as they join them.

For a nation cannot say freedom,and then go against the ways of God,for then it is not really freedom,but some mischief is going on,which we will see in the future.
Seeing as how you're a theocrat, there is no reasoning with you so I will take my leave of you now
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
13,050
1,161
113
Re: Hate Much?

As I said in the OP, I felt it was more than Islamic
terrorism on the very day of September 11th, 2001.
My first child was born in '96, and I chose neither to
vaccinate that child, nor any of my subsequent children.
Also, I never owned a computer or had any online presence whatsoever until 2004.
Guess I was stupid before stupid was cool.
Yep
not vaccinating your children is stupid
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
13,050
1,161
113
Seeing as how you're a theocrat, there is no reasoning with you so I will take my leave of you now
I will say one more thing though. Funny you should mention Europe
Within the next 30 years or so Europe will be the Middle East minus the sand. You know why Muslim countries are the worst human rights hell holes on Earth?
Because they have Theocratic governments
 
H

Huckleberry

Guest
Antifa Much?

Yep
not vaccinating your children is stupid
I hold the opposite view, however I don't "despise" people who choose to vaccinate
(infect) their children and willingly risk harming or killing them in the process.
They're you're children, and you should have the
right to decide what you believe is best for them.
No doubt that if you could, you would have me forced into your eugenical
culture of pseudoscience, which puts you into the bigoted liberal fascist camp.