all I am saying is that no one, by using the Biblical definition of sin, is sinless. that's it. I am not calling anyone derogertory names.
pure and Holy.
If they are, at that point they are righteous, sinless. No sin is held against them, nothing.
That is what forgiveness means. This is why the argument is so subtle and twisted.
Now the trick is to then generalise and say someone who is Holy, will still fail 24/7.
How does anyone know other than God?
As I have stated too many times this is disbelief in scripture and walking in the Spirit.
We do not know, other than Christ did not sin in his whole life.
And we are to walk like Him.
Now unless you are God, you can only testify to your own struggles and issues, and
I have learnt we are all different and it is dangerous to assume anything.
So each speaker who talks about failure is both in unbelief about the promise, in unconfessed
sin which they often disclose in some idea this is being honest, and they understand the gospel
even though their testimony is contradicting it. So why should I or anybody take such a
speaker seriously. I do not not, because I believe Jesus.