But how do you believe? Is it something you drum up in yourself? Or does God choose to give it to you?
True story! And an experience!
I went to Baptist Sunday School as a child, memorized lots of Scripture, including John 3:16. But not the context.
I drifted away from God, became an atheist, then agnostic, stumbling into the New Age movement, which was terrible! Then, there was a revival in the area I lived. People were witnessing to me everywhere I turned. I was sorely tempted to lie and say I was saved, just so they would leave me alone. Lots of Scriptures preached to me, not a bad thing! And lots of amazing testimonies. About people that were completely hostile to the gospel, woke up in the middle of the night saved!
And yet, they and I ended up in Arminian churches. I was taught, over and over, that I could lose my salvation, which makes sense if I am the one who made it all happen, by my choice or free will. I was also taught to evangelize the lost, which was as good thing! But not in the way that I say a sinner's prayer, put the "Get Out of Hell Free" card in my back pocket.
I don't remember what I was taught from the Bible in those churches, but I denied my own coming to Christ. The Baptist Churches I went to, all taught eternal security. Which really only makes sense if God is the one who saves. Because if I chose to be saved, then I can also choose to lose my salvation, by walking away from God.
So, how was I saved? Well, after all those people telling me I needed Christ, and why, my future husband sat me down and told me I needed to repent of my sins. That was the part of the gospel everyone who was witnessing to me forgot to tell me.Because, they were using the carrot, not the stick. And that is an incomplete gospel.
My husband (forgive me for calling him that, but after 37 years of marriage, it is hard to remember a time when we weren't married!) told me about various people in the Bible who sinned and needed to repent. Like King David, and Mary Magdelene and Paul. It finally hit me, what the gospel was! I was too proud to admit my need for Jesus, until God spoke to me. He told me to follow him, and that he was the Saviour of the World! (Read John 3:16)
I did not save myself. I was evil. I couldn't bring myself to believe I was answerable to God! I wasn't free to choose or believe! But, when I heard that voice, I KNEW Jesus was God, and my Saviour. There was no "choice" to follow. No choice to believe and obey! It was just part of God saving me. Nothing I could do, and everything that God did do!
So many years off track in churches that really didn't know the Bible! Whose pastors had a year or two of Bible college after high school graduation, with no original languages, theology or hermeneutics. It was very sad!
But, I was moving towards a Reformed viewpoint, because God was leading me. Part of that was reading the Bible faithfully and studying it all those years. Part of it was reading what the Reformed viewpoint was. I thought the bottom had dropped out of my life, when I read that God saved us, and then we believed and repented! I had never heard that! (Well, I probably had, but it made no sense to me at that time!)
But the real reason I became Reformed besides studying the Bible, was simply because I knew I could never, ever have saved myself. I was pretty wicked! I ran in the wrong crowds, drank too much, and never acknowledged the evil in my heart and life. But, despite me, God saved me, totally and completely of his will! And yes, I pray for the lost and I share the gospel, as much as I am able.
Please pray for my sister, Michele. We had a great talk this week about God. (I've been witnessing to her since I was saved, 37 years ago!) But this time,. She got interested in listening to audio Bibles. So, I recommended to her some apps, I know that the Word of God is powerful! And I pray God will reveal himself to her in Jesus Christ, and he will save her!
Sorry to be so long again!
1. Angela, as always, I want to point out that I respect you, and appreciate you, before moving on to pick at something you've said.
You are my friend, as well as my sister in the Lord, and it's appropriate to be respectful of, and appreciate for, the brethren.
2. I'm not going to attack Calvinism here, I'm just going to nitpick a few points of logic...
and how, in this particular debate, we often use straw men without realizing it.
3. Although your testimony is moving, and powerful, and we SHOULD be using our personal testimonies in both our witnessing and our counseling... that does not mean some PARTICULAR POINT of your testimony makes a good PROOF for some particular little thing.
This isn't a matter of appreciating your testimony... this is a matter of logic, and whether or not some particular point of your testimony supports some particular point of this debate.
We all need to be careful of this...
myself included.
4. The point:
The final conclusion to your testimony, though very powerful and meaningful, makes a couple of logical errors in its "application" to this debate.
This is not to say I don't appreciate your testimony... this is just a matter of logical application to a particular debate point.
The issue:
When you state the reason you became reformed is because "I knew I never could have ever saved myself," ... although this is an important tenant of the christian faith, it cannot be applied, in this context, to this debate.
Why?
Because the other side of the debate ALSO believes the same thing.
It's like saying you became reformed because you believe in wearing socks and shoes...
but if you looked more closely, you'd see the other side also wears socks and shoes.
In this particular debate, your point carries no weight of logical necessity.
You don't have to be reformed to believe you cannot save yourself.
Most christians, who are evangelical, all believe the same.
Logical necessity cannot uphold the point "I became Reformed because of ABC" when the other side also believes in ABC.
This is a straw man.
It is a straw man, and a fair sized presumption, to assume the other side does NOT believe God alone saves them.
This is a classic straw man in this centuries old debate.
I know you are an honest person, and you don't intentionally set up straw men... but in theology, we all hear the straw men, and we sometimes have the straw men beaten into us... and we often use them without even thinking about it.
What the other side actually believes... dealing with the straw man:
Regarding this point about the other side believing the same thing: It is certain that, in traditional Arminianism, people DO believe they can lose their salvation... implying they "keep" their own salvation, and thereby implying they esentially "earn" their own salvation.
However, in the modern era, this is NOT what most "non calvinists" believe at all. And most people labeled as "Arminian" are NOT Arminian... this is just a label thrown on them.
I know VERY FEW evangelicals who actually hold to the Arminian view that they can lose their salvation. Labeling all non-calvinists as Arminian is a huge error, and is itself an act of setting up another straw man.
Conclusion: what has happened here?
1. By using a traditional straw man about the "other side's" beliefs, we create one particular distinction which DOES NOT REALLY EXIST, and then, on the grounds of this straw man distinction, we can easily claim "logical necessity" as the reason for choosing sides.
2. However, all of this is built not upon reality, but upon a straw man.
3. I am not accusing Angela of anything intentional or unethical. I think we use a plethora of straw men, CONTINUALLY, on BOTH SIDES of the Calvinist/Arminian debate... and we hear them so often we use them without thinking.
4. Let everyone take notice: if a good Christian woman like Angela, who is highly intelligent, and highly educated, and of good character, can make an occasional logical slip regarding these traditional straw men... then I think the rest of us are apt to do far worse, and we should be very careful in our reasoning.