(quoted from OP)
"At a shallow level, it may APPEAR like evangelical Christianity is wrong on something, but the more and more I study Scripture, and understand the entire word of God, the more the evangelical Christian view makes sense on any given topic. From a shallow, bottle-sucker level, I may think my logic is infallible and that the church is clearly wrong on a doctrine, but as I dig deeper, I find that there are legitimate reasons why the church holds a given doctrinal position."
In your opinion, is it, or would it be a correct interpretation, that Jesus of Nazareth abolished "the law?"
Or? Would it, or should it be considered, that the missing the mark of "the law", are covered BY the "love that covers a multitude of "sin" (short coming/s missing the mark). And,By loving their neighbor, as themselves, are not abolishing the law, at all!
By "the law", I'm referring to the Torah, or Levitical law. Not, the "law", as it had apostasized to, when Christ arrived on the scene.