Are there any men or women who can interpret Revelation accurately?
What specifically do you want to know about it?
Are there any men or women who can interpret Revelation accurately?
I think he is referring to the carrion birds. Rev 19:17Hello CainHarmbank,
I couldn't help notice that in your post you mention "angels in heaven eating the flesh of men." What scripture exactly are you referring to? Because there is no scripture in Revelation where angels eat the flesh of men.
Thanks!
This fellow is a windup merchant. He's not genuinely interested in God. He's just stirring things up.What specifically do you want to know about it?
Are there any men or women who can interpret Revelation accurately?
I think he is referring to the carrion birds. Rev 19:17
But I wouldn't humour him with an answer.
Everyone should stop with the "interpreting" and just read/study and understand.
All the not understanding is a result of "interpreting". ( Making it support what you believe)
He was what we know as "black"
So were the Israelites, so were the Apostles, you can find old accounts of their appearance as having black skin.
Lamentations 5:10
King James Bible
Our skin was black like an oven because of the terrible famine.
White skin gets whiter in a famine, black gets blacker.
The Bible also describes the Jews and Egyptians as near identical in scripture, and the ancient Egyptians were black.
View attachment 177745
THE EGYPTIANS - Essential
Everyone should stop with the "interpreting" and just read/study and understand.
All the not understanding is a result of "interpreting". ( Making it support what you believe)
[FONT="]Josephus, a 1 century person, described him in his book Halosis:Mary, the mother of Jesus was from the tribe of Judah. This tribe is black. Since mitochondria DNA can only be passed on by the mother to the next generation Jesus is probably black. I agree with your estimation.
Do you still interpret Revelation with a preconceived notion?
Hello Ellsworth,
Interpreting scripture taking into consideration symbolism, context, cross-referencing and comparing scripture, is necessary to come to a right conclusion. To be able to discern between what is symbolic vs. literal is paramount. For example, surely you don't believe that a women is actually riding a beast with seven heads and ten horns, do you? Well then, this requires interpreting, based on scripture, who the woman is, what is meant by her "riding the beast." Then you need to find out the literal meaning behind what the symbolism of the seven heads and ten horns represent. All of these and more revealed right in Revelation.
It is the same with the riders of the horses mentioned in the seals. They are symbolic representing the literal results that take place as each one is called out. To be clear, the world is not going to literally see a rider on a white, red, black and pale green horses riding out for everyone to see. But their results that they represent will be seen and felt.
I have a question. If Israelites were "black" in Jesus' time, why aren't they today?
I have a question. If Israelites were "black" in Jesus' time, why aren't they today?
These guys seem like Jews.
![]()
I have a question. If Israelites were "black" in Jesus' time, why aren't they today?
These guys seem like Jews.
![]()
You call it interpretation but I call it just understanding what is literal and what is symbolic.
To most people I have met, interpretation means explaining what a verse "really" means even when it does not.
Regarding the examples that I used, one would need to interpret whether something is symbolic or literal. You would have to interpret what the red dragon with the seven heads and ten horns means, as well as the meaning of the woman riding the beast, etc. These all require interpretations based on the meaning given in scripture.
My point was/is that, the book of Revelation should be read in the literal sense until a symbolic interpretation is obvious or required.