No, lets talk now. If you're 25 and this is the best explanation you have for time zones...
...then it is pretty vital that we do talk. There is no mathematics or physics behind flat-earth theory. It's all "but what ifs". If the above image is your model for the earth, then the sun would literally have to act like a spotlight (which we would still be able to see btw). Again, you can't refute ANY of the arguments presented in the youtube video because it's scientific fact. The whole "you're just too ignorant for me to talk to" is what people say when they start to severely lose a debate, which you are doing right now dude. Buck up and defend your position if you want to make such wild claims.
OK let's talk.
I did not know we were debating, but if you want a debate you've now got one.
If you have taken some time to read my other replies on this thread I have explained some of the aspects of the flat model.
I urged you to research it for yourself because I honestly do not have the patience anymore to teach this stuff from the beginning.
If you are trying to insult me by referencing my age in regards to the time zone explanation I provided then you might want to brush up on your globe earth model.
Just to make my point, lets talk about seasons including northern and southern "hemispheres".
In the globe earth and space model, the culprit behind the alternate seasons between the southern and northern hemispheres is the "axial tilt" as shown in this very colorful animation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDgUmTq4a2Q
Now, you like to point out that the sun is too large for it to work on a flat earth model the way we claim that it works. It's interesting because your precious globe experiences these changes with a mere axial tilt.
In your model the sun is 93M miles away and it dwarfs the earth in comparison, it is literally 109 times larger than earth (allegedly). Do you understand that a simple tilt cannot possibly be the culprit for such phenomenon due to the sheer scale of the globe model? Try to visualize how ridiculous it sounds that a sun that is 93M miles away, 109 times larger than the earth will be affected by the earth simply "tilting"? That's like saying if I hold a tennis ball to a flash light and tilt it 23 degrees down, the northernmost part of the tennis ball will have more light/heat. Go ahead try it, and that is not even the correct scale. Now get a flashlight that is 109 times larger than the tennis ball and try the same exercise. It's completely flawed.
You are telling me that the northern parts of north america can be completely frozen over during winter and thaw out completely in summer because of an axial tilt?
Whatever happened to your sun being so large and mighty that after a few degrees it is completely and utterly defeated? (oh and don't forget that people in southern Canada get sunlight year round.
Don't you see that a smaller sun revolving around the earth, in a spiral motion from edge to center and back again makes a whole lot more sense to explain seasons, opposite climates between North and South, and it also beautifully explains time zones and anything else you can think of?
Who told you that the moon has a shadow?? Are you sure it is a shadow?
Since when do shadows appear to be the same color as the sky?
All I ask is that you stop trusting your education and mainstream sources so much, There is much truth that you won't learn there because it has been deliberately hidden.
I am not denying other "planets" exists. I am denying they are other places that you can theoretically set foot on. They are just other heavenly bodies. They are not what stark trek and star-wars have told you they are.
Question everything, do your own research, ask questions, don't be biased.