Does the Bible claim to be inerrant?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Musicus

Senior Member
Oct 26, 2017
314
39
28
The fact that they exist makes them relevant.
Your 37s patterns may be relevant to something, but it would seem that nobody else sees what that something is, and I for one keep hoping you will one day find and give us a clue, because you never seem to know.
 

Joseppi

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2018
887
7
18
Where in scripture is found the philosophy of them who are against the Authorized Version?

Where did you get the idea of error in scripture?
Or, that all translation corrupts scripture?

Where does the idea come from, that all modern bibles are acceptable to God?
I ask this because I hear scripture supporting believing the Authorized Version.

But I don’t hear scripture that presents the many strange ideas of those who are against there being one Holy Bible.
Can you opposers of one Holy Bible present something scriptural as the basis of your ideas?
 
Last edited:

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,851
13,459
113
Where in scripture is found the philosophy of them who are against the Authorized Version?

Where did you get the idea of error in scripture?
Or, that all translation corrupts scripture?

Where does the idea come from, that all modern bibles are acceptable to God?
I ask this because I hear scripture supporting believing the Authorized Version.

But I don’t hear scripture that presents the many strange ideas of those who are against there being one Holy Bible.
Can you opposers of one Holy Bible present something scriptural as the basis of your ideas?
This is another burden-of-proof reversal. You have not quoted anyone saying what you claim is said, yet you make assertions regarding what "they" claim.

How about you support your assertion that there is Scripture "supporting believing the Authorized Version". Remember to include the specific Scripture reference to "Authorized Version" in your response.
 

Joseppi

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2018
887
7
18
So you want to state that your copy of the bible translated into English meets the standard worthy to be called inerrant?
There is only one authorized Bible and it will correct any error found in any other bible.
It will correct, reprove, and rebuke all falsehoods found in fake bibles.

What is your standard by which you judge
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
There is only one authorized Bible and it will correct any error found in any other bible.
It will correct, reprove’and rebuke falsehoods.

What is your standard by which you judge
LOL who authorized this bible? You do know that it is the authorized version not the authorized bible? I seriously doubt that you could even read the authorized 1611 KJV.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
41,533
16,411
113
69
Tennessee
There is only one authorized Bible and it will correct any error found in any other bible.
It will correct, reprove, and rebuke all falsehoods found in fake bibles.

What is your standard by which you judge
What bible is this and who is the one who authorized it? Everyone can make a claim that the version or translation that they prefer is the only one authorized bible.
 

Joseppi

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2018
887
7
18
This is another burden-of-proof reversal. You have not quoted anyone saying what you claim is said, yet you make assertions regarding what "they" claim.

How about you support your assertion that there is Scripture "supporting believing the Authorized Version". Remember to include the specific Scripture reference to "Authorized Version" in your response.
You aren’t fooling anyone.
You have no scripture that supports your unbelief in the authorized Holy Bible.
I have asked numerous questions you haters of God’s written word haven’t responded to.
When folks present scripture you haters start obfuscating by any means necessary.
Acting like you can’t read English all of a sudden.

Instead of giving excuses why not establish the truth you claim is more righteous than the faith of them that believe what the authorized Bible says?
 
Nov 24, 2017
1,004
31
0
Just existence does not make anything relevant for theology. Also, when you presented your supposed patterns, nobody accepted them as patterns because you needed to do too much magic with it.
You have doubts whether the original scriptures were error free...why would you accept anything concerning the Bible?

I have said manytimes that my view is that only God is perfect.

Nothing where some creation is involved is perfect. So, to me, not even the original Scriptures.

And again, I must stress that I am talking about some theoretical textual, grammatical, material, physical perfection.

I do believe that Scriptures were and are and will be perfectly preserved in all important doctrines for all who search for them.
Where in the Bible:
Psalm 23, Christ´s words that Scriptures witness about Him etc.
You said a mouthful and this what you put forth as biblical evidence? Maybe you should concern yourself less with what I am posting about number patterns in the Bible and examine your beliefs concerning the scriptures based on what the Bible actually says.
 
Last edited:
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
What bible is this and who is the one who authorized it? Everyone can make a claim that the version or translation that they prefer is the only one authorized bible.

stop pretending you don't know which Bible is the glorious one

we all know that King Jimmy authorized it

problem is, he was not God :p
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
You aren’t fooling anyone.
You have no scripture that supports your unbelief in the authorized Holy Bible.
I have asked numerous questions you haters of God’s written word haven’t responded to.
When folks present scripture you haters start obfuscating by any means necessary.
Acting like you can’t read English all of a sudden.

Instead of giving excuses why not establish the truth you claim is more righteous than the faith of them that believe what the authorized Bible says?

ummm...I hope this isn't over your head...but:

how could scripture be found to support a king who lived long after the original was written?

questions...soooo many questions

are you sure that the haters are not well represented by your own posts?

whatever happend to giving an answer that displays the fruit of having the Holy Spirit inside of you?

ps...referring to Jesus overturning tables or Paul writing a hasty note of condemnation to the Judaizers, is not an excuse nor is zeal an excuse

do you have an excuse?
 

Joseppi

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2018
887
7
18
LOL who authorized this bible?
God.
The scripture says that God ordained king James the first.
You do know that it is the authorized version not the authorized bible? I seriously doubt that you could even read the authorized 1611 KJV.
Then you did know that God authorized it by king James the first.
As for version, that proves the authorized Holy Bible, consisting of both Old and New Testaments, is to be found in other languages
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
There is only one authorized Bible...fake bibles.
a) who authorized the 1769 KJV you are probably reading?

b) why do you think that any authorization of worldly local island king has any significance for a global church or at least for you, being American without any king?
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
You aren’t fooling anyone.
You have no scripture that supports your unbelief in the authorized Holy Bible.
I have asked numerous questions you haters of God’s written word haven’t responded to.
When folks present scripture you haters start obfuscating by any means necessary.
Acting like you can’t read English all of a sudden.

Instead of giving excuses why not establish the truth you claim is more righteous than the faith of them that believe what the authorized Bible says?
LOL you are chasing unicorns. No one has said that the authorized version is not the bible. God has most certainly protected His word through the millennia. What most protest is elevating one translation one version above another to the point that all others are worthless in comparison.

The original authorized version was translated from the Latin vulgate. Later translated from the Hebrew and Greek. KJV is good and easy to memorize but it is not the only reliable translation available in the English language.

You are arguing that Coke is better than Pepsi. Kind of pointless as it comes down to personal preference.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

Joseppi

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2018
887
7
18
stop pretending you don't know which Bible is the glorious one

we all know that King Jimmy authorized it

problem is, he was not God :p
The scripture teaches that God ordained the king.

All other bibles present no evidence of being authorized by God.

A no brainer seems to me.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
The scripture teaches that God ordained the king.

All other bibles present no evidence of being authorized by God.

A no brainer seems to me.
God ordains all kings both good and bad.

You did get the no brainer part right.

Now can someone get saved if they have a different version of the bible? Is John 3:16 as powerful in the NIV and the KJV? Does the Holy Spirit use the new versions or does the Holy Spirit use only the authorized version?

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

Joseppi

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2018
887
7
18
7seasrekeyed said:
how could scripture be found to support a king who lived long after the original was written?
Cyrus was ordained beforehand.
So it is a thing that God has done and can do.

Romans 13:1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
King James the first, king of all English speaking people on earth, was ordained of God to publish the Holy Bible.

The modern bibles are unauthorized by God.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
Cyrus was ordained beforehand.
So it is a thing that God has done and can do.



King James the first, king of all English speaking people on earth, was ordained of God to publish the Holy Bible.

The modern bibles are unauthorized by God.
Rates right up there with the Roman Catholic church claim that Peter was the first pope.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

Joseppi

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2018
887
7
18
a) who authorized the 1769 KJV you are probably reading?

b) why do you think that any authorization of worldly local island king has any significance for a global church or at least for you, being American without any king?
Because God ordains kings see Romans 13.
Whereas you have no authority to translate or sit in judgment of what God ordained.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
Because God ordains kings see Romans 13.
Whereas you have no authority to translate or sit in judgment of what God ordained.
God ordains all governments, not just kings.

But not to authorize Bibles. To protect good people and to punish evil people.

Which king authorized 1769 KJV?

Whereas you have no authority to translate or sit in judgment of what God ordained.
Tell that to apostles that because they were not worldly kings, they had no authority to judge what God ordained.