KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLES
- Thread starter KingJamesVersionBibleOnly
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
What a silly question - how does this in any way pertain to the KJV being inspired of God and all the other translations being wrong?
The NIV says this:
[FONT="]30 And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell. Matt 5:30 NIV
The same grisly advice!
So, the KJV and the NIV can be interpreted in exactly the same way.
In what way is the KJV superior, inspired of God etc, and the NIV not, according to this verse?
[/FONT]
The NIV says this:
[FONT="]30 And if your right hand causes you to stumble, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to go into hell. Matt 5:30 NIV
The same grisly advice!
So, the KJV and the NIV can be interpreted in exactly the same way.
In what way is the KJV superior, inspired of God etc, and the NIV not, according to this verse?
[/FONT]
Ah so you don't understand that Christ is the hand of salvation and when that right hand was cut off it saved the Body from hell.
Is that what the NIV says, does the the NIV use the same phrases such as right hand from cover to cover so that we can understand dark sentences?
I'm sure it doesn't take inspiration to do that, I mean surely Wescott and Horton knew these things lol.
Is that what the NIV says, does the the NIV use the same phrases such as right hand from cover to cover so that we can understand dark sentences?
I'm sure it doesn't take inspiration to do that, I mean surely Wescott and Horton knew these things lol.
Keep believing the words and promise you God will show you great and mighty things. Things the rest of the world can't see!The only basis you have for your position is your unshakeable belief that the KJV is "right" and therefore by comparison anything that you think differs from the KJV must be wrong... that is all you are saying...
What you are unable to prove is the first assertion: that the KJV is actually correct, inspired etc!
What you are unable to prove is the first assertion: that the KJV is actually correct, inspired etc!
Tell me how this justifies your KJVO stance?
You are making hopelessly unjustifiable personal accusations about me in a very obvious attempt to shield the fact that your KJVO stance has no basis in fact.
Trying to challenge my interpretation of the Bible (incorrectly by the way) does NOT in any way prove a KJVO stance!!!
You are making hopelessly unjustifiable personal accusations about me in a very obvious attempt to shield the fact that your KJVO stance has no basis in fact.
Trying to challenge my interpretation of the Bible (incorrectly by the way) does NOT in any way prove a KJVO stance!!!
