You have quoted exactly what I was going to address, and what is really wrong with this teaching.
The errors in this teaching need to be brought to everyone'e attention. I will quote this portion a little more extensively:
Joanne Krupp is essentially
ANOTHER FALSE TEACHER, and is another example of why God does not allow women to preach, teach, or assume authority within the local church.
What we find (after going through a lot of unnecessary verbiage) is that Krupp is doing a great job in EISEGESIS in order to promote her agenda. The Bible does NOT teach the submission of
husbands to wives, fathers to children, masters to slaves.That is what the Feminists want to promote.
So what exactly does the general spirit of submission mean
without having it contradict the specific commandment for wives to be subject unto their own husbands?
Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. (Eph 5:21)
"In the fear of God" is the key to understanding this verse since this must be the motive for submission. But "one to another" is a general statement pertaining to all Christians within the local assembly, and corresponds to Philippians 2:1-4:
1 If there be therefore any consolation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any fellowship of the Spirit, if any bowels and mercies,
2 Fulfil ye my joy, that ye be likeminded, having the same love, being of one accord, of one mind.
3 Let nothing be done through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.
4 Look not every man on his own things, but every man also on the things of others.
So here is what it really means to "submit yourselves one to another" -- being of one accord and one mind, not doing things through strife and vainglory, but esteeming others better than ourselves. Having humility of mind, and also concern for the problems and concerns of others.
One of the fundamental principles of Scripture is that Scripture does NOT contradict itself. So when God tells wives to submit themselves to their own husbands as unto the Lord, He backs it up with even stronger language:
Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands; that, if any obey not the word, they also may without the word be won by the conversation of the wives...For after this manner in the old time the holy women also, who trusted in God, adorned themselves, being in subjection unto their own husbands: Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement. (1 Pet 3:1,5,6).
What this passage says is that Sarah called Abraham "Master" (kurios = lord even implies ownership). And here is what "subjection" means in the above passage:
Strong's Concordance
hupotassó: to place or rank under, to subject, mid. to obey
Original Word: ὑποτάσσω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: hupotassó
Phonetic Spelling: (hoop-ot-as'-so)
Short Definition: I place under, subject to
Definition: I place under, subject to; mid, pass: I submit, put myself into subjection.
Now let every Christian ask himself/herself: If the wife is to obey the husband but the husband in turn is to obey the wife, would that not be ABSURD? And would that not contradict Scripture? The same principle applies if the fathers would be in submission to their children, and masters to their slaves. A world of absurdity!
None of this is to deny what obligations have been placed on husbands, parents, and masters (or employers) by Christ. That is a separate issue. But to turn Scripture on its head is unacceptable, and opposes the clear teaching of the Holy Spirit.
)
