LOL! I generally hear two different interpretations concerning the meaning of the phrase, “that which is perfect is come” in 1 Corinthians 13:10:Chirp chirp chirp... well? Too busy with the osas and tongues threads?
LOL! I generally hear two different interpretations concerning the meaning of the phrase, “that which is perfect is come” in 1 Corinthians 13:10:
1. It refers to when Jesus returns to earth. 2. It refers to the completed Bible. Those who strongly oppose the gift of tongues operating today usually gravitate towards the latter interpretation.
But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
What does this refer to? The writing of and assembly of a book, or the final redemption of creation when Christ returns?
No it isn't. While you are a cessationist, and therefore believe 1 Cor 13:10 is referring to the "completion of the NT revelation", that is not the only thing Paul could have been looking for.The only thing that Paul could have been looking for would have been the completion of the NT revelation.
No it doesn't. To this day, even though we now have the "complete Bible", we still only see in part.The seeing in part refers to the OT being a shadow of things to be fulfilled.
Yes, Christ has come the first time, and we have wonderful prophecies about the future. But we will not know everything, we will not "know even as we are known" until Christ returns.The prophecy of the Redeemer which is now complete in Christ.
No we don't. There are lots of things we still don't know. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves.Through the NT scriptures and with the indwelling Holy Spirit we see as we are to be seen by our Heavenly Father.
That is true.We see ourselves as redeemed in Christ and clothed in His righteousness.
That is true, but tongues will not fail, prophesy will not cease, and knowledge will not vanish away until Christ returns.We cease from childish things and move on to more mature things in the service of the Lord.
Yes. But there's still lots we don't know.The work of Christ on the cross was complete.
The context as well as the Greek word teleios translated as "perfect" mean that it is a reference to a complete Bible. Since the NT was written without punctuation or paragraphs, we should treat verses 11-13 as a separate (but related) topic.It refers to the completed Bible. Those who strongly oppose the gift of tongues operating today usually gravitate towards the latter interpretation.
No it doesn't. But you're a cessationist, so that's what you must assert.The context as well as the Greek word teleios translated as "perfect" mean that it is a reference to a complete Bible.
Yer killin' me, Nehemiah...Since the NT was written without punctuation or paragraphs, we should treat verses 11-13 as a separate (but related) topic.
First Paul says prophetically that we will have a complete Bible, therefore prophecies, tongues, and supernatural knowledge will not be necessary.
Agreed!At the same time, because we are still mortals on earth, we do not see everything that God has prepared for us clearly. Thus "through a glass (mirror) darkly". But when we are glorified and face to face with Christ we will have a full knowledge of God's plans, purposes, and provisions for His saints. And this ties in with 1 Cor 2:9.
It's the only thing that fits the context.No it isn't. While you are a cessationist, and therefore believe 1 Cor 13:10 is referring to the "completion of the NT revelation", that is not the only thing Paul could have been looking for.
There are many who do not know much but that is not Gods fault. The word is complete no additional revelation no additional prophecy.No it doesn't. To this day, even though we now have the "complete Bible", we still only see in part.
Opinion but not biblically sound.Yes, Christ has come the first time, and we have wonderful prophecies about the future. But we will not know everything, we will not "know even as we are known" until Christ returns.
Opinion with no biblical basis. If you do not know it is because you do not ask or it is not necessary for you to know.No we don't. There are lots of things we still don't know. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves.
Eisegisis to support a behavior. Tongues were never given for the Gentiles. Prophecy was never given for the Gentiles. Knowledge was never given for the Gentiles. The Holy Spirit was given for all flesh but the three sign gifts were given for Israel. Joel 2That is true, but tongues will not fail, prophesy will not cease, and knowledge will not vanish away until Christ returns.
Again God has given but not many have received.Yes. But there's still lots we don't know.
Most of your post is simply denials, or your opinion, but what I highlighted in red is easily proved wrong. In Acts 10, Cornelius and his family were gentiles, and they spoke in tongues.Tongues were never given for the Gentiles. Prophecy was never given for the Gentiles. Knowledge was never given for the Gentiles. The Holy Spirit was given for all flesh but the three sign gifts were given for Israel. Joel 2
Certainly the point of the appearance of tongues is lost to you. Tongues were a sign, a miraculous sign, for the Jews to see that God was at work in the saving of Gentile souls. God is provoking the Jews to jealousy through grafting in of the Gentiles and the breaking off of Israel.Most of your post is simply denials, or your opinion, but what I highlighted in red is easily proved wrong. In Acts 10, Cornelius and his family were gentiles, and they spoke in tongues.