That is inadequate and overlooks the sin nature which all other humans inherited from Adam. We aren't sinful because of sinful acts chosen willingly; we are sinful in the core of our nature. Jesus was not.
behold!! a virgin shall give birth
That is inadequate and overlooks the sin nature which all other humans inherited from Adam. We aren't sinful because of sinful acts chosen willingly; we are sinful in the core of our nature. Jesus was not.
behold!! a virgin shall give birth
![]()
Virgin can represent widows. In that way we all widows without Christ, our husband, and fatherless as to our heavenly father.
Its a picture of the chaste virgin bride of Christ the church ,.She is reckoned as the mother of us all.
Its the kind of religion that God puts his seal of approval on.
James 1:27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
hmm i'm having trouble thinking of anyone rightly called a widow who is a virgin.
but i have heard it said that the Jews consider a person married from the moment they become betrothed, in some sense - that once the steps of the marriage ceremony have begun, they're counted as married, even though it hasn't been consummated. this is how some people say, Lot did not have more than 2 daughters - they say the 'sons in law' mentioned in Genesis 19 are pledged to marry his daughters that were with him. that they're called sons-in-law even though they haven't *actually* become married yet. i disagree with that understanding of Genesis 19 - i think his family size was 10 - but that's another subject i've written about even recently.
the point here being, suppose a woman is engaged to be married, but her fiancé dies before the wedding night. is that woman a widow?
if so then she could be both virgin and widow.
that's something i'm not sure is an accurate use of the language, but i might be convinced. conceding that's the case, though, is that representative of us, as the church? i'm thinking of Romans 7:1-6, that we have died to the law in order to live for God - in order to become the bride of another. through which death and resurrection He is able to present us as spotless & chaste. but wouldn't this make the law a widower, rather than us a widow? since it is we who died?
He makes us a betrothed virgin in this way. are we His widow? He indeed died - but a widow is a woman whose husband no longer is: He is my husband, and He lives forever
Actually this is what we call bait and switch. The discussion is IF we have to follow the law to be saved. The discussion is is not on what is beneficial. The law says do not eat fat. (Lev7:23) The law uses two words: ALL and NONE and we see this in the KJV also. All fat is banned, we are to eat none of it. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and fat is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease. People are still saved, they are still going to go to heaven. In fact if they disregard the Bible on this they may get there sooner. So the question has to do with our weight, our health and how long we live. Not if we are saved or not. The problem is people say it is lawful to eat a unhealthy diet. When the question should be what is beneficial and what is best for us. David tells us that the law was given because of God's love for us and because He wanted the best for us. So the law was given to protect us.It’s another works based cult, stay away from it.
Actually this is what we call bait and switch. The discussion is IF we have to follow the law to be saved. The discussion is is not on what is beneficial. The law says do not eat fat. (Lev7:23) The law uses two words: ALL and NONE and we see this in the KJV also. All fat is banned, we are to eat none of it. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and fat is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease. People are still saved, they are still going to go to heaven. In fact if they disregard the Bible on this they may get there sooner. So the question has to do with our weight, our health and how long we live. Not if we are saved or not. The problem is people say it is lawful to eat a unhealthy diet. When the question should be what is beneficial and what is best for us. David tells us that the law was given because of God's love for us and because He wanted the best for us. So the law was given to protect us.
Virgin is a word used to represent the church previously unmarried widow
No such thing. You can't make a sound biblical interpretation from a non-existent concept. Widow always means a formerly-married woman. A woman who was never married cannot be a widow, period.
No.If we look at the literal interpretation and do not mix faith in what is seen or heard...
I agree with a lot of what you say here, however, there is some evidence for insulin resistant/metabolic syndrome being a determining factor in heart disease. To your point about the forbidden fat, my understanding is it's a special kind of fat we are not to eat, the fat around the kidneys. If it were just any old fat I dare say we'd have to become vegan. We can't separate every trace of fat from meat, also milk has fat in it.Actually this is what we call bait and switch. The discussion is IF we have to follow the law to be saved. The discussion is is not on what is beneficial. The law says do not eat fat. (Lev7:23) The law uses two words: ALL and NONE and we see this in the KJV also. All fat is banned, we are to eat none of it. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and fat is the leading cause of cardiovascular disease. People are still saved, they are still going to go to heaven. In fact if they disregard the Bible on this they may get there sooner. So the question has to do with our weight, our health and how long we live. Not if we are saved or not. The problem is people say it is lawful to eat a unhealthy diet. When the question should be what is beneficial and what is best for us. David tells us that the law was given because of God's love for us and because He wanted the best for us. So the law was given to protect us.
Dr Ornish has a plan that seems to be effective and he has done a lot of research. There is a lot of controversy because people make money selling food and they do not care if they have to lie to get you to buy their food.I agree with a lot of what you say here, however, there is some evidence for insulin resistant/metabolic syndrome being a determining factor in heart disease. To your point about the forbidden fat, my understanding is it's a special kind of fat we are not to eat, the fat around the kidneys. If it were just any old fat I dare say we'd have to become vegan. We can't separate every trace of fat from meat, also milk has fat in it.
Just be careful it does not turn into a cult. I will not comment on videos since I do not watch them.Well I think I've finally found a sect of Christianity that I identify with.