Not outright you didn't. One can easily infer that's what you meant when your remark used the implication behind, say they are Christian.Did not say they were not Christian, but I stick by my statement that A LOT OF FOLKS on this site believe ant teach things that are not true.
Hello dcontroversal, If homo sapiens according to the archaeological record have been around for circa 200, 000 years, why then would the Lord all of a sudden circa 5.000 years ago decide man was so corrupt that he needed to be destroyed at that point 5,000 years ago? Why was man (without God) so much more corrupt 5,000 years ago than he was 10, 20, or 100 thousand years ago? Answer: Homo Sapiens prior to circa 6000 years ago had not been created in the image of the Lord (His Spirit of love); and indigenous peoples of the world prior to circa 5000 BC would not have had His Spirit of love, and would therefore not have been deemed culpable of corruption without God.
Interesting hypothesis Luigi.
The Bible predicts that people would start denying the flood in the end times. FULFILLED PROPHECY:
2Pe 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
2Pe 3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation.
2Pe 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
2Pe 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
2Pe 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
Surprise surprise. Bible is right (again) and liberal watered down christians are wrong(again).
You need to elaborate more clearly what part is drivel. Is it that homo sapiens have been around for circa 200,000 years, or is it that the Lord prior to creating man in His image of love circa 6000 years ago was guiltless of corruption, or is it something else?No offense, but this reply reeks........there is no such evidence of the above drivel.......and make no mistake....that is exactly what it is....drivel.......
You need to elaborate more clearly what part is drivel. Is it that homo sapiens have been around for circa 200,000 years, or is it that the Lord prior to creating man in His image of love circa 6000 years ago was guiltless of corruption, or is it something else?
I'm assuming you are an recent earth creation believer; do you deny dinosaurs existed, or did they exist with man 6000 years ago?Except for the fact that it reeks of complete ignorance.......devalues God, the creation, makes the Genesis account into a lie and slaps God in the face with idiotic human reasoning from so called educated human beings..........I.E. the fools that publish this BEFORE MAN APE who later gets enlightened and comes online as a MAN in the image of GOD.....
Not outright you didn't. One can easily infer that's what you meant when your remark used the implication behind, say they are Christian.
A lot of folks on this site say they are Christian while believing and teaching things that are not true.
It also implies you teach only things that are correct and your judgment then arrives from that understanding of others.
Surely you have all the answers; Job 12:2.How do people here explain the aborigines in Australia, the indigenous people in South America, Asians and Africans who seem to precede an approximate 5,000 year ago flood?
A lot of folks on this site say they are Christian while believing and teaching things that are not true.
The word of God is assailed on all fronts by those claiming to be believers.....ever pushing the envelope of denial and or doubt while devaluing the very verbiage inspired of GOD to peddle man made theologies wrapped up in a nice little box with a bow of denial...........God will answer one day soon.....and when he burns the heavens and the earth while sweeping the planet with the besom of destruction there will be no naysayers left to sow doubt and confusion about what actually took place.........!!!!!!!
Some of you lot do really make up the mental in fundamentalism View attachment 190704
If that is what you got from my post, that is on me for not speaking more plainly.
It is not what I meant or believe.
Do I believe everything I teach is true, of course I do just as you believe that about what you teach.
When we disagree, it is obvious that we both can not be right, and it may be that we are both wrong.
I believe a person can be saved and not be a Christian.
Being a Christian is living a Christ like life. Sometimes we all fail from time to time. David is a great example.
Am I a Christian? I know I am saved, but I will let God determine if I am a Christian or not.
Not outright you didn't. One can easily infer that's what you meant when your remark used the implication behind, say they are Christian.
A lot of folks on this site say they are Christian while believing and teaching things that are not true.
It also implies you teach only things that are correct and your judgment then arrives from that understanding of others.
dcontroversal, who were all the people Cain was afraid would kill him in Genesis 4:14 after his having murdered his brother Abel, were they Adam's offspring?
Genesis 4:14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me.
I'm assuming you are an recent earth creation believer; do you deny dinosaurs existed, or did they exist with man 6000 years ago?
A Benny Hill comedian response, where do you think that spirit originates, from above or from the deceiver, Satan?You know what they say about assuming right???
Another none elaborated response..., from above or from below?Maybe you should study what this means in Hebrew-------->>>>>in the process of time