Einstein Was Wrong !

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
L

LPT

Guest
No stars are running on nuclear anything, the operative principle is of course Electromagnetic and Plasma phenomenon. The underlying principles are somewhat more abstruse.
Your wrong, a sun is full hydrogen and helium and there's fusion inside of sun.
 
L

LPT

Guest
Once people called the planets passing by wondering stars for they had no idea what they were. It's pretty clear people are still living in the Stone Age as far as science goes we are only scratching the surface of science on a grand scale.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,173
8,413
113
Your wrong, a sun is full hydrogen and helium and there's fusion inside of sun.
Prevailing theories of the function of our Sun a woefully inadequate, but more objectively…...false. Totally false.

 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,173
8,413
113
Once people called the planets passing by wondering stars for they had no idea what they were. It's pretty clear people are still living in the Stone Age as far as science goes we are only scratching the surface of science on a grand scale.
Correct. Worse than that.....we are being wilfully deprived of real science. IMO its a conspiracy of ignorance and silence. Why? Because if a limited mind such as I have can see the error of their ways, the scientific authorities must as well.
 
L

LPT

Guest
Great Video.....highly recommended.

It's not a galactic jet, they are pulsars neutron stars, yea it's not a sun but another object in the universe thus they call them stars.

No doubt the guy has a lot of big words, but there just big words.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,173
8,413
113
Walt Thornhill has his own views on gravity.....quite interesting....


<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,173
8,413
113
It's not a galactic jet, they are pulsars neutron stars, yea it's not a sun but another object in the universe thus they call them stars.

No doubt the guy has a lot of big words, but there just big words.
The Standard Model Cosmological theories are obsolete. The NASA stuff inclusive.
It appears that exotic matter is not necessary to achieve the vast energy output measured.
 
L

LPT

Guest
The Standard Model Cosmological theories are obsolete. The NASA stuff inclusive.
It appears that exotic matter is not necessary to achieve the vast energy output measured.
Most theory's have to be backed up with the math, anybody can come up with a theory and speak with a high amount of intellience.

Your a very good sport, and I apologize if I have come across as rude or insulting I don't mean it.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,173
8,413
113
Most theory's have to be backed up with the math, anybody can come up with a theory and speak with a high amount of intellience.

Your a very good sport, and I apologize if I have come across as rude or insulting I don't mean it.
In the old days, experiments preceded the math. Nowadays not so much. They think mathematics is a substitute for experiments.
 
L

LPT

Guest
In the old days, experiments preceded the math. Nowadays not so much. They think mathematics is a substitute for experiments.
Probably right, there are somethings in our universe we just cannot replicate on earth, and probably takes a bit of math to solve a outer limits experiment/experience.
 
L

LPT

Guest
If I had a theory one could soar on Galaxy cantus Firmus, how in the world could I.
 
L

LPT

Guest
Quite the reality our universe is full of music each object gives off a sound, and if one was to place all those tones in song I believe it would be the most amazing song.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,777
113
Looks like all the Einsteins are flocking to this thread. Einstein was A GENIUS.
 
L

LPT

Guest
Couple of tones from our tiny little solar system.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,173
8,413
113
Looks like all the Einsteins are flocking to this thread. Einstein was A GENIUS.
He was not without skill, or lazy either. But genius? I am not so sure. He is a minor player in a field of giants:




James Clerk Maxwell. Gave us the rudiments, field equations over time variables. His work is taken grossly out of context by modern quantum.

Michael Faraday. Gave us the principles underlying electromagnetic induction, diamagnetism and electrolysis. Also helped coined the term ‘dielectric’.

Oliver Heaviside. Gave us the coaxial cable, and the TRUE understanding of light.

Charles Proteus Steinmetz. The smartest genius you never heard about.

Nikola Tesla. The smartest genius you have heard about.

Oleg Jefimenko. Numerous PHDs, master of electromagnetic theorem.



Walter Russell. Expanded on and unified much of the works before him.
 

cv5

Well-known member
Nov 20, 2018
23,173
8,413
113
Anyone heard of Eric Dollard? Now would be a good time.

 

presidente

Senior Member
May 29, 2013
9,165
1,795
113
cv5,

You have posted a lot of videos. Maybe you can summarize some of the main points so that readers who do not have a lot of time to watch videos can become interested in your theories.

One video said the math behind the theory of black holes required dividing by zero. Another was about Einstein's theory assuming what? No mass or something along those lines. I saw part of it, but i forget.

I'd have to take certain math courses to follow some of this. I can't see how that would be a path for uber-effective evangelism for me. I think more people can follow the stuff Ravi Zecharias says.