no vote though?Imo 1 Enoch and Jasper are legit.
2 Enoch most likely legit.
3,4 Enoch are suspect.
Xethea, are you doing formal research with all these poll questions? If so, what is the end goal?
IMHO?
These "polls", are "character studies", into the mental, and emotional "stability" of believers in general. As to pending legislation that would greatly restrict the sale to, and ownership of a guaranteed constitutional right to own and carry firearms. At least in the U.S. And, further down the road? The 1-world system!
Even some socialists out there, want people to give up there facebook password, to the state police, in New York! For the same reason!
the book of "Jasper?" C'mon OP!
Joshua 10:13
And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.
To answer the question however? APPARENTLY? The "powers that be" of that time, didn't deem them worthy for inclusion!
i replied earlier on my phone and it changed Jasher to jasper.
Enoch and Jasher are both referenced in scripture...I have read both and have found the following....
a. No biblical contradictions
b. Some things no man could know without a higher influence
c. Numerous expounded ideas not in the bible and or barely touched on in the bible
The bigger questions.....Why were they left out of the cannon and WHO kept them from making the cannon....!!!
Seems the "canonizers" aren't the only ones omitting Jasher, eh?![]()
Enoch and Jasher are both referenced in scripture...I have read both and have found the following....
a. No biblical contradictions
b. Some things no man could know without a higher influence
c. Numerous expounded ideas not in the bible and or barely touched on in the bible
The bigger questions.....Why were they left out of the cannon and WHO kept them from making the cannon....!!!
Not Jasper but Jasher. What we do know is that while these books are mentioned in the Bible, they are not included in it.Is The Book of Enoch/Jasper True or False, or a bit of both?
IMO just because its not of the canon does not mean its not considered scripture. in those days they had higher levels of learning, Enoch would have been of the next level. like when Jesus was asked about why he spoke to the crowds in parables.
there are like 30 plus books mentioned in the bible that are not part of the bible we have today. and these are just the ones mentioned by name, many more are quoted.Not Jasper but Jasher. What we do know is that while these books are mentioned in the Bible, they are not included in it.
I personally enjoyed the book of Enoch....he spoke of things that modern science in our time has only rediscovered such as solar winds.....
It is possible that the book of Enoch (or 1 Enoch) is pseudepigraphical, meaning that someone other than Enoch wrote that book.there are like 30 plus books mentioned in the bible that are not part of the bible we have today. and these are just the ones mentioned by name, many more are quoted.