To answer your rhetorical question, my rhetorical answer would be 'maybe?".
So in essence, what might appear as incoherent ramblings might simply be a non-traditional response to the underlaying precept raised by the question of the author regarding whether the religious traditions and denominational doctrines are pushing people from the presence of God since it is written that he comes to God must believe he is.
Jesus himself taught, as written in John 3:12, "If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?" So if the heaven and the earth were created in the beginning, then would this planet be a heavenly thing or an earthly thing? Likewise would somebody coming to God be a earthly thing or a heavenly thing?
Thus if God is omnipresent, then how can man come to God's presence if God is already present if omnipresent, yet how can God be omnipresent if the scriptures represent that God is not present in this world? (See John 8:23)