you may well be right.I think breaking bread is an expression and I don’t think it equates with what most today think is an “ordinance”. There’s more to be said on this...
1 Corinthians 10:16-17 KJV
[16] The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? [17] For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.
Our communion is of the blood and body of our Lord. WE are one bread, and partakers of that one bread!
Paul is talking like Jesus did.
John 6:56,63 KJV
[56] He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. [63] It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.
So then, when Paul says if you eat and drink unworthily it has nothing to do with food and drink
I think it would depend how one interprets a passage like this
Acts 20: 7. On the first day of the week, when the disciples were gathered together to break bread,
Is break bread just another way of saying they ate together? Or is it an idiom for what most Christians today think of as communion?
you may well be right.
at the same time, Christians throughout history have tended to regard communion as something more than a standard meal.
of course one can say that they are not concerned with what other Christians have said in history. but then, where does the table of contents for the particular Bible that one uses come from?
an interesting article
https://www.christianitytoday.com/history/2008/august/early-christian-eucharist.html
the scriptures themselves do not say which writings are scripture and which ones are not.I think breaking bread is an expression and I don’t think it equates with what most today think is an “ordinance”. There’s more to be said on this... But I have a few more comments.
1 Corinthians 10:16-17 KJV
[16] The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ? [17] For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.
Our communion is of the blood and body of our Lord. WE are one bread, and partakers of that one bread!
Paul is talking like Jesus did.
Thanks for carefully considering this. The truth of scripture most certainly is our authority. I think famous commentators have far too often relied on tradition to interpret scripture. It's crazy how we proclaim that Christ nailed the handwriting of ordinances to the cross and yet we establish all kinds of rules and damnation surrounding religious practices. It's all about Jesus but mankind is so inclined to create a system of religious works he can perform.
the scriptures themselves do not say which writings are scripture and which ones are not.
to decide that, one looks outside of the scriptures, from what I've seen.
By looking at Christian tradition, what Christians have said throughout history. That's what happens in most every case that I've seen.How does one look outside of Scripture to determine what is Scripture?
When Jesus said do this in memory of Me, it was not a suggestion.
I do not consider any of what Jesus teaches me as a statute or commandment or new law unless He says so, but if you see what I posted first in this thread you may understand what I belie it means to each of us.
It is not a ceremony, ritual or beginning of one of the multitude of sects named denominations, it is a tribute to our Savior.
You see true communion with Jesus Christ is not eating bread or drinking wine, it is living His Word and Example and following Him as best we each are given todo....He is that prsonal.
If yu see religion in this it may be you are hung up on such things as obstacles. Be free of those obstacles and understand only by the HOly Spirit. He will give us all this I believe.