A
amberlynlover7
Guest
Okay.
1 Timothy 4:1
The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Okay.
Well not sure how you derived this from the one verse, but not likely true, need far more extensive study to draw this conclusion.
That is a good guess, actually. Lucifer, the word itself, means what the passage of scripture in Isaiah speaks about. But what Isaiah is speaking about, DOES NOT mean the word, Lucifer...if this makes any sense.
It's like me saying, "the sky is blue." And someone else saying, "the sky is all of the colors it takes to make the color blue." In reality, we say the same thing. But ultimately, it makes the entire definition different from what I said compared to what someone else said.
To the RCC (Roman Catholic Church), the word Lucifer (Latin Vulgate Language) means "morning star."
Translations of morning star in LATIN
noun
Frequency
lucifer
lucifer, Morning Star, day, venus
eous
Morning Star
To the Hebrew's it means something else:
Morning star in Hebrew =
Translations of morning star
noun
Frequency
אַיֶלֶת הַשַׁחַר
morning star, daystar
עַמוּד הַשַׁחַר
dawn, morning star
בַּרקַאִי
morning star
The RCC took the meaning of a word MORNING STAR and translated it into their own Language = Lucifer.
But the Hebrew word for Morning Star is בַּרקַאִי, which in English means = "in the morning"
Translations of בַּרקַאִי
noun
Frequency
morning star
אַיֶלֶת הַשַׁחַר, עַמוּד הַשַׁחַר, בַּרקַאִי
For one, here is concrete evidence the RCC has messed with the translation and our Bible.
Secondly, if the RCC messed with the Book of Isaiah, it's safe to assume they messed with the New Testament as well!!
It might be in your Bible, but it isn't in mine. I don't primarily use the KJV.
Your earlier assertion was this: "For one, here is concrete evidence the RCC has messed with the translation and our Bible."
The presence of the word "Lucifer" in the KJV is not evidence that "the RCC has messed with the translation". Rather, it is evidence that a Latin version was used somewhere in the thread of sources leading to the KJV. While both are claimed by the RCC, neither Jerome nor Erasmus were, themselves, "the RCC". Though he was a priest, Erasmus' translation was an independent effort, not an RCC church effort. So, your assertion is refuted.
Your present assertion is that "the word Lucifer was added to our Canon".
It wasn't added; it is a transliteration from a language other than Hebrew. "Baptize" is a transliteration as well, in this case from Greek. For the word to be considered "added", there would have to be an absence of a corresponding word in Hebrew. An example of an actual addition is the word "unknown" in the KJV of 1 Corinthians 14:2, or the words, "the brother of" in the KJV of 2 Samuel 21:19. Those words have no correspondence in the source language manuscripts.
Revelation 12:7-9
Now war arose in heaven, Michael and his angels fighting against the dragon. And the dragon and his angels fought back, but he was defeated, and there was no longer any place for them in heaven. And the great dragon was thrown down
Use to be a Christian? Please explain what you mean.My belief and occult have nothing do to with my perception. FYI I'm not even in a occult. Btw I use to be a Christian so I know alot of bible. I'm just simplfy asking questions or giving some theory that I thought of.
Use to be a Christian? Please explain what you mean.
Ya I'm saying that I use to be a Christian. People who saw my recent post about how I say life is hard. Think I'm some part of cult because I use mediation law of attraction and subliminal. However I stop using subliminal since I heard how people can say negative affirmation.
Wow... you really showed me. I guess I should humbly bow out of the conversation, having been so completely out of step with reality.It so happens to also be in the online kjv as well. Even the Concordances (Youngs and Strongs) have it listed. The term Lucifer can be found in several places related to biblical scripture.
In other words, just because it is not listed in your Bible does not mean squat, when it is listed in other versions plus can be found in the Bible's basic THESAURUS/DICTIONARY (the Concordance of the Bible) of the Bible.
Why do you meditate?
Do you have focus issues?
You very well could just turn that into praying while thinking of the things you meditate upon.
Wow... you really showed me. I guess I should humbly bow out of the conversation, having been so completely out of step with reality.
Before I do though, I'll mention that concordances (Strong's and Young's included) are compendia of words used in Scripture. I'm not so familiar with Young's, but Strong's lists every word found in... the KJV. The presence of "Lucifer" in Strong's is therefore absolutely irrelevant to the discussion. Young's was first published in 1879, so it likely used the KJV as well. Also, it is common knowledge in the field that, in the case of proper names, many older modern translations in English follow those found in the KJV, out of familiarity. Finally, it's rather ridiculous to argue that because a word is found in an online version of a particular Bible translation, that somehow provides additional weight to the argument. It doesn't... in the least.
Your position is still groundless.
I just use mediation for calm and relaxation as I hear instrumental sound such as waterfalls or piano.
As you say, it isn't a salvation issue. It's not even an issue for "knowing who the real enemy is", because if people connect "devil," "satan," "adversary," and "accuser" with "Lucifer", they aren't far wrong. Is it technically correct? No. Does it matter for about 99% of believers? Probably not.I am not attempting anything towards you, other than pointing out resources that include the term, Lucifer. You claim it is a null and void situation, yet millions of believers actually think the head fallen angel's name is Lucifer. The creator of this thread was convinced Lucifer was his name and many from this site assumed the same thing. You go to any church and pay attention to the sermon. In enough times, eventually that pastor/preacher will even speak as if Lucifer is his name.
It might be a done deal for You and I since we understand and know better when it concerns Lucifer. But churches are packed weekly, full of God fearing believers, that actually believe Lucifer is his name. So in reality, it is an actual problem. It's not a problem concerning their salvation or walk in God, but a problem that they actually do not know who their real enemy is. And their real enemy has no name that we are aware of. Even the Hebrews who wrote the Torah scrolls clarify this by referring to him as, "the Adversary."
2 things, it don't seem to be working for you, and I meditate as well. I just meditate on scripture which is biblical and scripture is the foundation of all truth.Ya I'm saying that I use to be a Christian. People who saw my recent post about how I say life is hard. Think I'm some part of cult because I use mediation law of attraction and subliminal. However I stop using subliminal since I heard how people can say negative affirmation.