C
claysmithr
Guest
He's a controlled opposition gatekeeper, there is just too much evidence to deny this.
The thing is that it is non-import.I'm really confused, why is this of any import??
Do these two believe in a flat earth?
He's a controlled opposition gatekeeper, there is just too much evidence to deny this.
Except... umm... .Bill Hicks was like... ummm... really smart and eloquent.
And whenever someone in a crazy video says "irrefutable evidence", they generally follow that with pure presupposition.
...
Do these two believe in a flat earth?
I'm really confused, why is this of any import??
Alex Jones is smart too, he's just playing a character, as per his lawyer in his divorce
Um sorry please keep flat earth stuff off this thread. It's actually a common psyop to derail any meaningful discussion.
How can this guy possibly be the gatekeeper of anything poisonous or otherwise.because it means alex jones is a gatekeeper poisoning the well of conspiracy information on the web, when you control both sides of the argument you can keep the conversation only on "approved" topics.
AJ job is to only show "approved truth" and make conspiracy theorists look idiotic
How can this guy possibly be the gatekeeper of anything poisonous or otherwise.
I agree. For example, Saudis doing 911. Lol. It's obvious to anyone with half a brain that 911 was an inside job, but why blame a country half-way across the sea, when there were demonstrably culpable people in the US government.He's a controlled opposition gatekeeper, there is just too much evidence to deny this.
I have heard alex say 500 times " 911 was an inside job".I agree. For example, Saudis doing 911. Lol. It's obvious to anyone with half a brain that 911 was an inside job, but why blame a country half-way across the sea, when there were demonstrably culpable people in the US government.
Same with this deal about him getting sued for telling the truth about the Sandy Hoax shooting. I wouldn't be surprised to learn the court case etc. was some sort of charade, to turn the heat up on people legitimately speaking the truth.
But he lays the blame at the feet of the Saudi government? How could you be so right about the crime, but so wrong about the perpetrator? I smell a rat.I have heard alex say 500 times " 911 was an inside job".
I thought it was about what is true. For example, if Alex Jones indicated that Sandy Hook was faked on video, wouldn't someone have to demonstrate it was not faked, before a judge would rule guilty?the court system in this country works like this- it is not about what is true, it is about what you can prove, while we know there are dozens of " questions" about sandy hook, they can' be proved.
when you are own video , saying " it was staged ' that can be proved, and if you do not retract, the judge will say " guilty ".
Um sorry please keep flat earth stuff off this thread. It's actually a common psyop to derail any meaningful discussion.
Based on the OP I don't believe that meaningful discussion is possible. Personally, I don't see the importance of the topic about 2 whack jobs.
He's a controlled opposition gatekeeper, there is just too much evidence to deny this.