Brother Absolutely has stated it perfectly I believe...
He did not answer those questions: But if u will rather not answer, that is your choice.
Brother Absolutely has stated it perfectly I believe...
Nope,if you need an answer twice that's fine. There is one Gospel,the shed blood. Same in the OT and NT. Without it there is no remission of sin.He did not answer those questions: But if u will rather not answer, that is your choice.
Nope,if you need an answer twice that's fine. There is one Gospel,the shed blood. Same in the OT and NT. Without it there is no remission of sin.
The apostles were Jews under the law. The Gospel that they were preaching before and after they received the Holy Spirit is about God's plan of salvation. They were preaching what Jesus was teaching them. The shed blood of Jesus symbolizes the coming of the Holy Spirit. John the baptist spoke of the Holy Spirit in Matthew 3:11-12 which the apostles wrote in their books. They were preaching about the coming of the Messiah and everything that was written about Him in the scroll. They were preaching about FAITH and obedience to God unto salvation. One Gospel and it is the WORD of TRUTH.When you read the 4 gospels, are you aware that the 12 had no understanding that Jesus had to die and shed his blood? As for the resurrection, none of them was expecting that, even when it was reported to them that Jesus’s body was missing from the tomb.
So how can they be preaching that gospel of the shed blood during the 4 gospels?
The apostles were Jews under the law. The Gospel that they were preaching before and after they received the Holy Spirit is about God's plan of salvation. They were preaching what Jesus was teaching them. The shed blood of Jesus symbolizes the coming of the Holy Spirit. John the baptist spoke of the Holy Spirit in Matthew 3:11-12 which the apostles wrote in their books. They were preaching about the coming of the Messiah and everything that was written about Him in the scroll. They were preaching about FAITH and obedience to God unto salvation. One Gospel and it is the WORD of TRUTH.
I was not yet even there and so were you. Did you hear what their preaching? I have made a point so you can just disagree and present your views for the enlightenment and edification of those reading along.The question is, "Did the 12 preach the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, during the 4 Gospels"?
A simple yes or no would suffice.
I was not yet even there and so were you. Did you hear what their preaching? I have made a point so you can just disagree and present your views for the enlightenment and edification of those reading along.
Thanks and God bless.
I was not yet even there and so were you. Did you hear what their preaching? I have made a point so you can just disagree and present your views for the enlightenment and edification of those reading along.
Thanks and God bless.
NIV1984 John 14:6Anyway, if you read the 4 Gospels, you will get a pretty clear idea what they were NOT preaching
- Ignorant of Jesus’ Death, burial, and resurrection
- 1. Matthew 16:21-22 – Jesus first began to tell them of his death and yet Peter tried to prevent it.
- 2. Mark 8:31-32 – Another account of Peter rebuking the Lord for speaking about his death.
- 3. Mark 9:31-32 – After hearing about the death and resurrection of Jesus the disciples “understood not and were afraid to ask him”
- 4. Luke 9:44-45 – “But they understood not this saying, and it was hid from them, that they perceived it not: and they feared to ask him of that saying.”
- 5. Luke 18:31-34 – “And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things which were spoken.”
- 6. John 2:21-22 – They did not understand the resurrection until after it happened.
- Disbelief in the Resurrection
- 7. Mark 16:5-14 – The ladies were afraid when they found the tomb empty. The disciples did not believe after two witnesses testified of the resurrection.
- 8. Luke 24:1-4 – The ladies were perplexed about what had happened to Jesus.
- 9. Luke 24:8-12 – The stories of Jesus’ “disappearance” were idle tales. Peter wondered what happened.
- 10. John 20:2 – Mary Magdalene thought someone had stolen Jesus after he had resurrected.
- 11. John 20:7-9 – The disciples after seeing the empty tomb believed Mary that someone had stolen Jesus. They did not know about the resurrection yet.
Conclusions:
- Did not understand the cross for salvation
- 12. John 20:21-23 – Even after the resurrection, the disciples did not understand what it accomplished. Here they are given the authority to remit sins.
- 13. Acts 3:14-15 – The crucifixion was presented as a murder indictment to Israel at Pentecost. The resurrection as a warning that he would return to seek vengeance.
- 14. Acts 5:28 – Instead of the blood being payment for sins it was presented as the evidence of guilty murderers.
- 15. Acts 7:52 – Stephen accuses the rulers of betrayal and murder of the Just One.
- 16. Acts 10:39 – According to Paul’s gospel Christ died willingly in the place of sinners. According to Peter he died because he was slain by certain Jews. Could it be that Peter does not yet understand the mystery of the cross?
This list does not prove that the Twelve were disobedient to the gospel that was presented to them. Contrarily, they were some of the first believers in the gospel of the kingdom. They were among the faithful remnant of Israel who trusted that Jesus was the Son of God and promised Messiah.
However, these verses show that the gospel they knew and trusted was not the preaching of the cross that Paul taught. Whereas they knew Jesus Christ as Messiah to Israel, Paul would later teach Jesus Christ on the cross as payment for sins to Gentiles.
The preaching of the cross was offered for salvation first through the Apostle Paul as the Lord revealed the meaning of the death, burial, and resurrection. The Twelve apostles were ignorant of this message.
"...to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery..." Ephesians 3:9
Whatever Jesus taught the apostles are the words of truth which the apostles preached, the gospel of Christ. They lived with Him and therefore testified about what they saw and heard. They are witnesses of Him just like Paul who testified about what he saw and heard from a vision on his way to Damascus. The Gospel is the WORD of TRUTH from God, the gospel of our salvation. So whatever we received and accepted that came from God is the gospel of God whether it was preached by the twelve apostles or Paul, it is one and the same gospel of our salvation that we received through a living faith that worketh in LOVE which according to John is to WALK IN OBEDIENCE TO HIS COMMANDS.
God bless.
The good news of the entire nt is Jesus saves.When you read the 4 gospels, are you aware that the 12 had no understanding that Jesus had to die and shed his blood? As for the resurrection, none of them was expecting that, even when it was reported to them that Jesus’s body was missing from the tomb.
So how can they be preaching that gospel of the shed blood during the 4 gospels?
goujing is trying to make the point that there are 2 gospels. Not 1.I was not yet even there and so were you. Did you hear what their preaching? I have made a point so you can just disagree and present your views for the enlightenment and edification of those reading along.
Thanks and God bless.
The op?He did not answer those questions: But if u will rather not answer, that is your choice.
The op?
That the disciples did not preach the blood?
You are framing that in the idea that there are 2 gospels.
I already know where you are going.
You are probably right that they didn't have that revelation,but they went out with the good news that the messiah has come.
But nonetheless,Jesus preached the blood. ....in the 4 Gospels
Paul said we should take heed to the words of the Lord Jesus.
Paul preached the same message as the others, dont let anyone flim flam you into believing anything else.
^ I see this in kind of the same way as the "but of that day and hour KNOWETH [perfect tense]" no man [not even Jesus, at the time He spoke this]"... but this does NOT say, "no man CAN [or WILL] EVER know," nor "it is FORBIDDEN to know"... (the CONTEXT speaking of His Second Coming to the earth FOR the promised and prophesied EARTHLY Millennial Kingdom)… I believe Jesus has "known" ever since His resurrection/ascension/exaltation, and THEN LATER supplied FURTHER INFORMATION (on THIS SUBJECT) in His LATER "[The] Revelation" (95ad--"[The] Revelation of Jesus Christ, WHICH GOD GAVE UNTO HIM [unto Jesus, exalted] TO SHEW UNTO His servants..." and which "things" conclude with "His Second Coming to the earth," per Rev19, and which chpts provide quite a number of "time-related" phrases / time-stamps throughout). I do not believe it is biblically correct to say "STILL NO ONE knows" (Jesus does!) or "NO ONE CAN/WILL EVER know" (this is to disregard the "perfect tense" and the SEQUENCE issues provided for us in several places, informing us of "what" came "when"... as far as "when" He "SAID" things)
If the "Great Commission" irrelevant for the church, then one is saying that the gospel has been preached to everyone one and the end is here. Jesus said once the Gospel is preached to every creature Than the end would come. I think that is very much presumptuous for one to say. We are to continue till HE comes or we die.