The Kingdom of heaven is not the treasure or the pearl but what matters is THE MAN and his finding it.
In the parables of the hidden treasure and the pearl what matters is not the value because Il would be poor philosophy to travel and to bargain for things of such value.
It not even a question of rightful
ownership.
The pearl is the message we have in front of us coming from Jesus.
This has absolutely nothing to do with me "mixing faith" or not. Objectively wrong is still objectively wrong, and faith has nothing to do with it. You are objectively wrong in your interpretation of the parable of the pearl. You have assigned meanings to the components that simply don't make sense. There is no "hidden meaning" in an erroneous interpretation.
It's unfortunate that you have taken a single statement about Jesus' ministry and applied it to the entirety of Scripture. Jesus did not say, "All of Scripture is parables with hidden meanings." Rather, Scripture says, "Jesus spoke all these things to the crowd in parables; he did not say anything to them without using a parable." He spoke to the crowd in parables, so that "Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand." The crowd that He is talking about is made up of unredeemed, unsaved Jews, not Christians. Don't confuse them!
Think about this for a moment: when Jesus was speaking just to the disciples, He explained certain parables. If all of Scripture were parables, then Jesus would be speaking in a parable when He explained the parable. That's silly, yet that is what you seem to believe. Further, you use the word "parable" when speaking of historical narrative; they are two distinct kinds of literature. You then assert that there are hidden meanings in the historical narratives.
I assure you, the problem is not that I am "not mixing faith" but that you are mixing in error. Just read the text for what it is, and when the Scripture itself tells you that it is a parable, then it is a parable. Otherwise, it isn't.
Yes, or it's in the plain text.I thanks for the reply.
I would agree. There is no "hidden meaning" in an erroneous interpretation. The spiritual meaning its hidden in the parables
That's adding to Scripture again. Scripture actually just says, "But when He was alone with his own disciples, he explained everything." (Mark 4:34).Yes to the crowd everyone, believers and unbelievers. When he got the disciple alone he had that opportunity to teach by his own actions and words directed by the father, aiding them how to hear the signified language of God as the personal signature.
Scripture doesn't support that idea.He kept driving into their fleshly minds. . . without parable.... I speak not. Not once did he say if the literal seems to make human sense don't look for another interpretation no digging stay on the surface. Every time the meaning was hid they would revert back to natural man and play "who is the greatest" WWW Alpha Dog and Jesus standing right in the mist of the fire . They learned how to hear the unseen just as any other person .
Not all parables are Scripture. Parables are also found in other literature. Revelation is not all a parable; there are two chapters of letters. The clues to interpretation are indeed in Scripture, but not all of the clues are metaphors.All parables are scripture (As it is written) but not all scripture is a parable. Except Revelation one parable. A signified place were no more new types and shadows are used. The bible form the beginning offers all metaphors needed to give the spiritual understanding.
Agreed; moral laws are not parables. However, parables can be used to teach moral lessons. Song of songs is not a parable, but it does use metaphor and other poetic devices.Moral laws are not parables. Commands like ..Study to show oneself approved unto God is not a parable . All of the Proverbs are form a parable . They are parables of wisdom having no historical value .
Song of Songs a parable.
I have explained several things, in plain English.I would think you could give your understanding then we can get on the same page rather than a unknown tongue.
That's a good topic for a separate thread.Something I have been looking at for a while. 40 years. Can you explain what you think the scripture means by "mixing faith" ? It seems to divide those who hear the gospel. . . having faith, the eternal understanding from those who have no ears to hear the unseen voice. no faith.
Garee said: .........a new spirit that never dies the gospel....
Jesus said: "the words I say to you are spirit (and water) and life"
Jesus' agony in the garden prior to His arrest was not a parable. It really happened, and there was no "hidden spiritual meaning" to it. The events actually happened, and actual events are not parables.The verse does not use water. words are not water ."the words I say to you are spirit and are life" no water needed in that parable. (John 6).
Yes those are the words that will never die.
Water like blood are used to represent the pouring out of the unseen of the Holy Spirit. His doctrine falls(inspired) from the sky like water or dew another metaphor that speaks of the unseen work of the Holy Spirit . Like the parable sweat as if it was drops of blood to indicate the unseen work of pouring out his spirit in jeopardy of his own spirit life .
2 Corinthians 4:18While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.
We are not save after the things that do appear. The 20 /20 prescription above is needed for the unseen understanding. Like the parable believe.
Deuteronomy 32:1-3 King James Version (KJV) Give ear, O ye heavens, and I will speak; and hear, O earth, the words of my mouth.
My doctrine shall drop as the rain, my speech shall distil as the dew, as the small rain upon the tender herb, and as the showers upon the grass:
as the rain, Not rain . God is not condensation .