Did Jesus ever tell us that we no longer need to keep the law of Moses?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Greetings Karraster,

Good citation, but several still insist that the Laws of God are disassociated with the walk of the child of God.


You will never hear them respond to verses like:

Rev 14:12 KJV Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

written after Paul's writings which many pick and choose from to construct their doctrines.

What is at work here from what I see is this; and it starts with most of us in agreement; The Law was offered to the Israelites at Mt Saini, but they refused to receive it from the Spirit/Mouth of God so they requested a mediator, Moses. The chose the letter over the Spirit.

Exo 20:18-21 KJV And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw it, they removed, and stood afar off. (19) And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die. (20) And Moses said unto the people, Fear not: for God is come to prove you, and that his fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not. (21) And the people stood afar off, and Moses drew near unto the thick darkness where God was.

So when God spoke The "Written Law" or the Torah to Moses not only did He hear the words, but he received the Spirit that accompanied it when God gives it directly.

All the people of Israel were to become a “kingdom of priests,” not just a “kingdom with priests" and what made the difference was their refusal to "draw near to God"

So Moses was the only one until we read of the ordination of Aaron and his sons in Leviticus 9 and in vs 23-24 we read where once again the Glory of the Lord appears again, but then only the family of Aaron are added to those who are Priests with the Levites in their company.

Moses, speaks of His disappointment at the "Kingdom with priests" vs a "Kingdom of priests" in;

Num 11:29 KJV And Moses said unto him, Enviest thou for my sake? would God that all the LORD'S people were prophets, and that the LORD would put his spirit upon them!

Moses knew first hand that the written Laws of God are insufficient to make men priests...to do this the letter of the Law must be accompanied by the Spirit of God.

So what do we say now?

2Co 3:1-18 NIV Are we beginning to commend ourselves again? Or do we need, like some people, letters of recommendation to you or from you? (2) You yourselves are our letter, written on our hearts, known and read by everybody. (3) You show that you are a letter from Christ, the result of our ministry, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts. (4) Such confidence as this is ours through Christ before God. (5) Not that we are competent in ourselves to claim anything for ourselves, but our competence comes from God. (6) He has made us competent as ministers of a new covenant—not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. (7) Now if the ministry that brought death, which was engraved in letters on stone, came with glory, so that the Israelites could not look steadily at the face of Moses because of its glory, fading though it was, (8) will not the ministry of the Spirit be even more glorious? (9) If the ministry that condemns men is glorious, how much more glorious is the ministry that brings righteousness! (10) For what was glorious has no glory now in comparison with the surpassing glory. (11) And if what was fading away came with glory, how much greater is the glory of that which lasts! (12) Therefore, since we have such a hope, we are very bold. (13) We are not like Moses, who would put a veil over his face to keep the Israelites from gazing at it while the radiance was fading away. (14) But their minds were made dull, for to this day the same veil remains when the old covenant is read. It has not been removed, because only in Christ is it taken away. (15) Even to this day when Moses is read, a veil covers their hearts. (16) But whenever anyone turns to the Lord, the veil is taken away. (17) Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom. (18) And we, who with unveiled faces all reflect the Lord's glory, are being transformed into his likeness with ever-increasing glory, which comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit.


So the Letter as Paul says is

Rom 7:7-25 NIV What shall we say, then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! Indeed I would not have known what sin was except through the law. For I would not have known what coveting really was if the law had not said, "Do not covet." (8) But sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, produced in me every kind of covetous desire. For apart from law, sin is dead. (9) Once I was alive apart from law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life and I died. (10) I found that the very commandment that was intended to bring life actually brought death. (11) For sin, seizing the opportunity afforded by the commandment, deceived me, and through the commandment put me to death. (12) So then, the law is holy, and the commandment is holy, righteous and good. (13) Did that which is good, then, become death to me? By no means! But in order that sin might be recognized as sin, it produced death in me through what was good, so that through the commandment sin might become utterly sinful. (14) We know that the law is spiritual; but I am unspiritual, sold as a slave to sin. (15) I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. (16) And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. (17) As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. (18) I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature. For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. (19) For what I do is not the good I want to do; no, the evil I do not want to do—this I keep on doing. (20) Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it. (21) So I find this law at work: When I want to do good, evil is right there with me. (22) For in my inner being I delight in God's law; (23) but I see another law at work in the members of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and making me a prisoner of the law of sin at work within my members. (24) What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? (25) Thanks be to God—through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, I myself in my mind am a slave to God's law, but in the sinful nature a slave to the law of sin.

Sadly, I beleive that dogma has prevented many from hearing that the Law is good, but without the Spirit of God it is grevious. So when a man receives the Spirit of God the Law becomes LIFE!

IF IF IF:

Rom 8:6-11 NIV The mind of sinful man is death, but the mind controlled by the Spirit is life and peace; (7) the sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God's law, nor can it do so. (8) Those controlled by the sinful nature cannot please God. (9) You, however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ. (10) But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, yet your spirit is alive because of righteousness. (11) And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit, who lives in you.


The ifs are critical to a new relationship with the righteous requirements of God
I see your ignoring me now

Will you please answer HOW the moral code helps us in our walk with God??

I have been patiently waiting.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,673
13,131
113
Is there a cut off point to decide?

If x number of scripture says you need faith and baptism, how many more than x you would need to say, majority wins?

Would that be more ridiculous than using different time periods to understand the distinction?
Which scripture says you actually need more than faith?
Seems to me any list you give is misapplied and misinterpreted. Because if even one really says that, it contradicts the whole list of verses that say salvation is by faith, without adding anything further.
That, or that second list is all misinterpreted.

So which is more likely, God had a brain fart when He said everyone who believes in the Son has eternal life? He somehow forgot all about His other requirements?
Or that when someone says you can only have salvation by keeping this law or observing this ritual, they are wrong about what they say?
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
That assumes “baptism” spoken if of the water variety, and not the spirit variety.

If it is of the spirit variety (which I think it is) then al scripture is united

If it is of the water variety, Then it contradicts or at the very least calls into question the rest of the scripture which leaves out this requirement.
Acts 2:38 made it clear. They have to repent/believe and be baptized (water) to get the gift of the holy spirit (HS baptism). Similarly, the accounts in early Acts point towards water baptism (Acts 8:36-38).

But as you have heard from me many times, once the grace dispensation came, you only need to have faith in Jesus's DBR to receive the one baptism, which is HS baptism. Water baptism is now phased out (Ephesians 4:5)
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
Which scripture says you actually need more than faith?
Seems to me any list you give is misapplied and misinterpreted. Because if even one really says that, it contradicts the whole list of verses that say salvation is by faith, without adding anything further.
That, or that second list is all misinterpreted.

So which is more likely, God had a brain fart when He said everyone who believes in the Son has eternal life? He somehow forgot all about His other requirements?
Or that when someone says you can only have salvation by keeping this law or observing this ritual, they are wrong about what they say?
Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38, Rev 14:12, among others.

As I have said, you consider it contradictory because you interpret scripture based on Covenant Theology. In your mind, there is no difference between the requirements for salvation throughout the entire Bible.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Acts 2:38 made it clear. They have to repent/believe and be baptized (water) to get the gift of the holy spirit (HS baptism). Similarly, the accounts in early Acts point towards water baptism (Acts 8:36-38).

But as you have heard from me many times, once the grace dispensation came, you only need to have faith in Jesus's DBR to receive the one baptism, which is HS baptism. Water baptism is now phased out (Ephesians 4:5)
Acts 2: 38 says no such thing, Only in your english bible does it say so. In the original text. It makes no such claim

And acts 2 or mark 16 does nto contradict the many many passages which even jesus himself says believe in me and you will live forever. With no mention of baptism.

Your making it HARDER for a NT believer to get saved than an OT believer, who could not even be saved by law
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38, Rev 14:12, among others.

As I have said, you consider it contradictory because you interpret scripture based on Covenant Theology. In your mind, there is no difference between Jews and Gentiles throughout the entire Bible.
Rev 14: 12 does not me ntion the word baptism. It is a DESCRIPTIVE passage of those who are true believers.. Using this passage means you must believe we must follow all Gods commands.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
Acts 2: 38 says no such thing, Only in your english bible does it say so. In the original text. It makes no such claim

And acts 2 or mark 16 does nto contradict the many many passages which even jesus himself says believe in me and you will live forever. With no mention of baptism.

Your making it HARDER for a NT believer to get saved than an OT believer, who could not even be saved by law
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

The connecting words, on plain reading, made it clear the connection between all 3 aspects, faith, water baptism and HS baptism.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
Rev 14: 12 does not me ntion the word baptism. It is a DESCRIPTIVE passage of those who are true believers.. Using this passage means you must believe we must follow all Gods commands.
We have already debated this in the other thread. During the Tribulation years, you need to believe AND reject the mark of the beast. So its more than just faith.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,673
13,131
113
Mark 16:16, Acts 2:38, Rev 14:12, among others.

As I have said, you consider it contradictory because you interpret scripture based on Covenant Theology. In your mind, there is no difference between the requirements for salvation throughout the entire Bible.
You're making a big assumption about what I believe, and you happen to be very wrong. I do not buy into the whole Presbyterian thing whatsoever.

We've already discussed Mark 16:16, it does not say those who are not baptized are damned. Neither does Acts 2:38 and neither does Revelation 14:12.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
You're making a big assumption about what I believe, and you happen to be very wrong. I do not buy into the whole Presbyterian thing whatsoever.

We've already discussed Mark 16:16, it does not say those who are not baptized are damned. Neither does Acts 2:38 and neither does Revelation 14:12.
You asked for scripture that explicitly stated that you need more than just faith to be saved and I have given you three examples.

If you want to play mental gymnastics with those verses instead of interpreting them literally, you are certainly free to do so.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

The connecting words, on plain reading, made it clear the connection between all 3 aspects, faith, water baptism and HS baptism.
Your reading me the English translation

Try reading the greek. Where peter tells ALl (plural) to repent for the gift of the spirit. And let every one of YOU (singular) be baptized because of remission of sin.

The bible was not written in english my friend, The english translators did nto always get it right.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
We have already debated this in the other thread. During the Tribulation years, you need to believe AND reject the mark of the beast. So its more than just faith.
And I already proved you wrong in that thread.

So I guess we need to do that here also? What does this have to do with Law?
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You asked for scripture that explicitly stated that you need more than just faith to be saved and I have given you three examples.

If you want to play mental gymnastics with those verses instead of interpreting them literally, you are certainly free to do so.
And you were shown to be missaplying those three

And you still have the MAJOR hurdle to jump as to why other passages do not say baptism also.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
And I already proved you wrong in that thread.

So I guess we need to do that here also? What does this have to do with Law?
You have not proven anything. You keep adding conditions to the term faith, to include rejecting the mark of the beast, as part of faith. That is not a proof.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
And you were shown to be missaplying those three

And you still have the MAJOR hurdle to jump as to why other passages do not say baptism also.
Simple, one is the gospel of the kingdom, one is gospel of grace. I have already stated to you:

But as you have heard from me many times, once the grace dispensation came, you only need to have faith in Jesus's DBR to receive the one baptism, which is HS baptism. Water baptism is now phased out (Ephesians 4:5)
 

FollowHisSteps

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2019
3,674
1,201
113
I am a gymnast yet I do not gymnastic things.
Am I what I am claiming to be or a liar?

The whole gospel is that we might be changed, become a new creation, that which brings
glory to God and is focused on love and life, eternity brought into this world.

All the prophets, apostles and Jesus call us to the walk in the ways and will of God.

But some want to say faith can exist without a clear demonstration of our Lord.
For me this is not an argument, it is foundational to the relationship with God.

Now clearly there are "religious" people who take on a lifestyle and appear one way but
live another. The pharisees were such a group. Their failure was not in their aspirations
but not in gaining a cleansed heart and taking seriously love.

Unfortunately those who want Jesus who loves sinners despite their wilful sin, there is
little one can say, other than life is so much greater than slavery to sin and the gospel is
the promise of freedom and life.

God bless you.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
You have not proven anything. You keep adding conditions to the term faith, to include rejecting the mark of the beast, as part of faith. That is not a proof.
I am not adding conditions my friend, You are

Your making salvation by works. Not faith. Not me

Paul said if it is grace it is not of works. Otherwise grace is no longer grace. And vice versa.

We see you have chosen works. Good luck with that.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Simple, one is the gospel of the kingdom, one is gospel of grace. I have already stated to you:

But as you have heard from me many times, once the grace dispensation came, you only need to have faith in Jesus's DBR to receive the one baptism, which is HS baptism. Water baptism is now phased out (Ephesians 4:5)
There is ONE gospel. If anyone teaches another. Even if they are an angel. Paul said they are to be damned..

Again, Trust paul. He spoke as inspired by the spirit. You can trust him, its ok...
 

FollowHisSteps

Well-known member
Feb 15, 2019
3,674
1,201
113
Ironic blindness

This type of discussion attracts people so set in their views, to actually believe they are sinners in
need of repentance and change of behaviour is a step too far. There minds are so closed, the idea
they could find life and love has left them a long time ago, it is just belief and being who they are.

Bit of a problem when the belief is just a man mad notion, and they stand judged and they see what
fruit they really brought to this world.

And I speak also humbly, that equally I must be careful to stand and repent of that which I need to
resolve and walk in the ways of God, Amen
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
Which scripture says you actually need more than faith?
Seems to me any list you give is misapplied and misinterpreted. Because if even one really says that, it contradicts the whole list of verses that say salvation is by faith, without adding anything further.
That, or that second list is all misinterpreted.

So which is more likely, God had a brain fart when He said everyone who believes in the Son has eternal life? He somehow forgot all about His other requirements?
Or that when someone says you can only have salvation by keeping this law or observing this ritual, they are wrong about what they say?
Gongshow likes to embellish and or peddle his own contextually inept view of scripture......Chuck would be proud.....!