THE CALLING OUT OF THE BRIDE, to go to The Wedding of the Lamb
- Thread starter VCO
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Hi VCO,
Regarding the bold ^ ,
how do you account for the fact that Daniel [OT saint] was told he would "rest [that is, in death] and STAND IN THY LOT [that is, be resurrected ('to stand again on the earth')] at the END OF THE DAYS [at the END of the 'days' just referred to in that 12th chpt of Daniel, which is covering the second half of the trib (Dan12:6,7,1)]" ...??
My view is that OT saints are NOT a part of "our Rapture" (as they have not been promised such), but instead ARE "A PART" of the resurrection (and will indeed be present FOR "the promised and prophesied EARTHLY Millennial Kingdom" which will commence upon His "RETURN" to the earth, at just this same point in time that Daniel is said he will be "resurrected" [and again, see the G347 word, as found in Matt8:11 and parallel, as well... etc (Eph1:10 not being "in this present age [singular]")]).
Just curious how you are seeing Dan12:13 (not to mention 12:12, which I believe refers to the "still-living" who will ENTER the MK in mortal bodies). What say you?
Thanks.
[to be clear, I am also "pre-trib," like you are... I just see this particular point differently than you do]
Regarding the bold ^ ,
how do you account for the fact that Daniel [OT saint] was told he would "rest [that is, in death] and STAND IN THY LOT [that is, be resurrected ('to stand again on the earth')] at the END OF THE DAYS [at the END of the 'days' just referred to in that 12th chpt of Daniel, which is covering the second half of the trib (Dan12:6,7,1)]" ...??
My view is that OT saints are NOT a part of "our Rapture" (as they have not been promised such), but instead ARE "A PART" of the resurrection (and will indeed be present FOR "the promised and prophesied EARTHLY Millennial Kingdom" which will commence upon His "RETURN" to the earth, at just this same point in time that Daniel is said he will be "resurrected" [and again, see the G347 word, as found in Matt8:11 and parallel, as well... etc (Eph1:10 not being "in this present age [singular]")]).
Just curious how you are seeing Dan12:13 (not to mention 12:12, which I believe refers to the "still-living" who will ENTER the MK in mortal bodies). What say you?
Thanks.
[to be clear, I am also "pre-trib," like you are... I just see this particular point differently than you do]
You may have misunderstood my post. I'm not meaning "I'm not a supporter"(meaning me) what I'm stating is that he(Levitt) often attacked the DTS in Dallas (and other A9D's,A28D's ect.) and . He himself(Levitt) see/read his old "the Levitt letter" or see if you can find any of his old radio broadcast, lol.
In any event Levitt was a "Christian Zionist" not a Dispensational like MAD,A13D,A28 Ect.(he was against those) https://www.levitt.com/essays/christian_zionism
That's why I said I was going to just watch(I thought Christian Zionism and MAD had come to agreement,lol) I realize now that most only know Zola Levitt from youtube and not from hearing him or knowing who he supported or was against,lol.
That's why I said I was going to just watch(I thought Christian Zionism and MAD had come to agreement,lol) I realize now that most only know Zola Levitt from youtube and not from hearing him or knowing who he supported or was against,lol.
H
Hope you dont mind me jumping in bro!
But here is one way to put it: "The first resurrection" does not mean FIRST in QUANTITY, but in QUALITY. First class, the resurrection of LIFE, contrasted with the resurrection to damnation.
Anyway, just dropping by to say that those who argue that NO RAPTURE can take place before Rev 20:4 are not taking into consideration the TWO WITNESSES who are caught up. Them guys were VIP I guess no need to wait till Rev 20:4?
But here is one way to put it: "The first resurrection" does not mean FIRST in QUANTITY, but in QUALITY. First class, the resurrection of LIFE, contrasted with the resurrection to damnation.
Anyway, just dropping by to say that those who argue that NO RAPTURE can take place before Rev 20:4 are not taking into consideration the TWO WITNESSES who are caught up. Them guys were VIP I guess no need to wait till Rev 20:4?
Dallas Theological Seminary,,, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_Theological_Seminary
Me too(radio broadcast) he was Acts 2 dispensationist(A2D) and supporter of Christian Zionism. If you notice https://www.levitt.com/essays/dh (and many other letters on the site) and compare it to this thread it is A2D verses A9D,A13D,A28D,,ect.