I want to use that phrase.biblically challenged person
I want to use that phrase.biblically challenged person
Your responses are increasingly asinine and troll-like.Let's have some documentation.
No proof.
David hogan has witnessed hundreds raised from the dead in mexico.
I think i already posted the video.
Even if Jesus appeared at a murder scene or some accident and raised a person from the dead or restored a severed leg etc.,the cessationist would either say the devil did it or it was fake.
But never would Jesus get the glory.
To them Jesus lost all his power
They got a big big devil...and a tiny little Jesus
1 Cor 13:8 Three gifts end or cease.Can you show me scripture where Paul taught that any of the gifts have ceased?
Define partial knowledge and full knowledge. The OT was completed in the NT. Apostles had greater knowledge than the scholars and Phd's of their day without attaining a formal education in religion. Believers today must study and pray for knowledge in the scriptures not simply inherit it by gifting.Are you saying that there are some people who do not know that partial knowledge was replaced by full knowledge?
That would be a self-contradictory position, wouldn't it?
Define partial knowledge and full knowledge. The OT was completed in the NT. Apostles had greater knowledge than the scholars and Phd's of their day without attaining a formal education in religion. Believers today must study and pray for knowledge in the scriptures not simply inherit it by gifting.
You completely miss what the passage is saying. Through knowledge of the book we have knowledge of ourselves in relation to God but the apostles had knowledge of the book before it was written.Then you have a problem with your interpretation, because it says 'Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.' It doesn't say Paul will get a book with all the knowledge that he can research. Your interpretation doesn't match. Your interpretation has us getting the knowledge which doesn't effect Paul, since he is asleep in Christ, and then your interpretation is about a book to study from, not knowledge.
Here you are misconstruing "knowledge". The gift is "the word of knowledge", which is a message about something which is not known in the natural. It could be almost anything; nowhere does Scripture restrict the "knowledge" to spiritual issues or to later-revealed Scripture. In order for your view to work, you must prove beyond doubt that the "knowledge" is what we would later know as Scripture; all the letters not yet written when 1 Corinthians was written.You completely miss what the passage is saying. Through knowledge of the book we have knowledge of ourselves in relation to God but the apostles had knowledge of the book before it was written.
For the cause of Christ
Roger
You completely miss what the passage is saying. Through knowledge of the book we have knowledge of ourselves
This is exactly why you are wrong. Paul says that he knew in part before the perfect came. The New Testament contains apostolic knowledge, like Paul told the Ephesians-- "that by reading this ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ."in relation to God but the apostles had knowledge of the book before it was written.
That proves nothing. If the Baptism was for today, you would see miracles in the headlines every day worldwide. Everyone would be like the Apostles if what Charismatics say was true.Your responses are increasingly asinine and troll-like.
You have a distant and diminishing relationship with sound reasoning.That proves nothing. If the Baptism was for today, you would see miracles in the headlines every day worldwide. Everyone would be like the Apostles if what Charismatics say was true.
I pray for wisdom every morning.You have a distant and diminishing relationship with sound reasoning.
More tireless zeal to reframe Jesus's testimony and church.But the gifts expired with the Apostles. Proof? no miracles today. Paul stopped healing his sick friends in the Epistles. The church has not had the gifts since the first century. And today's "knockoffs" have no trustworthy source in W. Seymour.
If even one miracle happened today like in Acts, it would be worldwide headline news. Instead we have embarrassment for anyone calling themselves a Christian coming from the ranks of the Charismatics.More tireless zeal to reframe Jesus's testimony and church.
"All african ant are red"
Really?
"Yes ,all sources that say otherwise are false"
Have you Been to Africa?
"What for? As long as me and my colleagues believe it,i am fine with my great authority and snippy crafty explainations."
Wow,i have been there and you are wrong
"Nope no such thing as me being wrong in my theory"
Look,you have no authority. You are guessing and use poor standards for your theory. There are many colors of ants in africa
"Show me one"
Not my problem. But yours is invincible ignorance. There are in fact other colors.
"Color is just the pigment and the way light is reflected"
Never mind. Continue your fool's paradise.
As long as it exists in your mind and your teacher's minds that is all that "matters" ....again....in your mind.
Happy that you have such "proof"...facepalm
YesIs there any video of what David Hogan described?
Your accusations are without merit. I have not claimed superior knowledge to Paul or the other apostles. I do have a more complete written account of Gods revelation to man. Same Holy Spirit but no superior knowledge.It does not say that. We can read it. The words are right there on the page. Your eisegeting your own ideas into the text.
This is exactly why you are wrong. Paul says that he knew in part before the perfect came. The New Testament contains apostolic knowledge, like Paul told the Ephesians-- "that by reading this ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ."
Your interpretation makes your knowledge full and Paul's incomplete-- because you a possess a book with his, and other apostles' knowledge--which doesn't mean you have the knowledge. You have the book. Having the book and knowing it are different, and many people who have the book know little.
Believers are to believe what God has delivered to them in His word. If you will not believe you cannot grow and increase in knowledge. You become as the person you accuse others of becoming.Here you are misconstruing "knowledge". The gift is "the word of knowledge", which is a message about something which is not known in the natural. It could be almost anything; nowhere does Scripture restrict the "knowledge" to spiritual issues or to later-revealed Scripture. In order for your view to work, you must prove beyond doubt that the "knowledge" is what we would later know as Scripture; all the letters not yet written when 1 Corinthians was written.
Look up "cushings disease in dogs".If even one miracle happened today like in Acts, it would be worldwide headline news. Instead we have embarrassment for anyone calling themselves a Christian coming from the ranks of the Charismatics.
Read the nt.I pray for wisdom every morning.