I am only commenting for now so I get notifications, I pray that this thread will remain peaceful , in Jesus name Amen...
...xox...
It is definitely interesting, I've said my bit and also will keep checking in...
I'm curious what others think
I am only commenting for now so I get notifications, I pray that this thread will remain peaceful , in Jesus name Amen...
...xox...
I can't do multiple quotes John...Has this happened?
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
His second coming is when he comes to earth and reigns for 1,000 years.
I believe "the desolate" and "the one who makes desolate" (in verse 27) are both in the singular... for what it's worth.Take from that what you will.
Has this happened?
30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.
31 And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other.
His second coming is when he comes to earth and reigns for 1,000 years.
Because the wrath of god is not against Israel it’s against the beast and His followersLuk 13:35 Behold, your house is left unto you desolate: and verily I say unto you, Ye shall not see me, until the time come when ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord.
Jesus cursed Israel and left them desolate, why wouldn't that be exactly who Daniel 9 is talking about?
Thank you for your kindness!lol fair enough... i cant say i agree but ill be happy to give you a hug and my first "told ya so" in heaven
I am sure many think this lolNo absolutely... it was my mistake... i thought you called eg the antichrist![]()
Your houseYes, "house" is usually a term designated to Israel.
What did Jesus say ?
God did what he said he would doDo you think that God didn't pour out his wrath on the Jews in AD 70?
It's talking about the house of Israel as in a group of people, not a physical building. God poured out his wrath on the Jews and the temple in AD 70, did he not?Because the wrath of god is not against Israel it’s against the beast and His followers
plus
It says your house. The temple is there house that is left desolate but againm
Gods wrath is not against it
I can't do multiple quotes John...
So question 1, do I believe The Son of man has already came with clouds of heaven... yes I do. And, Jesus told the high priest that HE, HIMSELF would Christ coming in the clouds.
Mat 26:63 But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.
Mat 26:64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
How can i not believe that it's already happened when the bible says it has?
It's talking about the house of Israel as in a group of people, not a physical building. God poured out his wrath on the Jews and the temple in AD 70, did he not?
Where is the second return in the clouds? I'm asking because I don't know of two comings in the clouds.Would that not make Jesus coming back twice in the clouds , returning twice?...
I know when Stephen was stoned , he saw Jesus when the heavens opened up before him as Stephan died...
...xox...
Mat 26:64 Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.
How can i not believe that it's already happened when the bible says it has?
The events in these verses start to take place at the start of the tribulation.When do the verses above take place, during the tribulation or at the 2nd coming of Christ or some other time?
Second part. If Jesus doesn't return until his second coming, and it's after the 1000 year reign, then you have to believe that Christ returns TWICE.
I know you can't see this, but the purpose of Jacobs trouble was to separate the wheat from the chaff. The wheat, Christ gathered into his barn, the church. The chaff, he burnt in the fire of AD 70.God did what he said he would do
but the wrath is supposed to bring about Jacobs repentance. So it’s not on her (see Jacobs trouble)
This is off contextI would agree except for when it began, when Christ said "it is finished". The time of reformation had come a tribulation like never before until that time this time in Matthew 24:21and never again .
A religion losing its temporal face. Which was to turn?
Matthew 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
Daniel 12 King James Version (KJV) And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book. And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.
The graves were open as the propmised glory that would follow after our suffering savior before hand. We look back the beginning of the great tribulation. Still performing its work as the letter of the law . . the school master .
1 Peter1:11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.
I don't know who any of the beasts are. Maybe the first one was the Jews and the second is the Catholic church, not saying that's so. I have never really delved into the beasts that much, there are too many other things in the bible that are crystal clear to help me learn more.Not in how it is described in revelation.
Who do you believe the second beast with the horns of the lamb is?
A group of people?
If so I would disagree with the separation between the antichrist and the many anti christs.