Equality has become a religion and an ideology. Thus, it goes by the name of ‘egalitarianism’. It’s not simply about taking notice of things that are equal or trying to make social laws equally just for everyone. It’s about forcing equality on things and people that are not equal and can never be equal. It’s about pretending that a dumb person is really just as smart as an intelligent person by coming up with endless social or historical
excuses for the dumb person’s failures or by redefining intelligence. All sides try to justify their views or position on the basis of equality–one kind or another. So, it’s only natural that the people pushing the gay agenda use the equality argument for ‘gay marriage’. They say gay couples should have equal right to marriage as normal or heterosexual couples do. And, if such is not provided for them, society is evil, wicked, and oppressive.
Of course, equality is not synonymous with sameness. Sameness means that two things are alike. Equality means bestowing equal value to two things which may or may not be alike. For instance, an orange and a tennis ball are not the same, but they can have equal value if both cost $1. But, only a fool would say a tennis ball should be categorized as a food item because its monetary value is equal to that of an apple. They are of equal value but not the same thing.The problem of marriage equality is more serious because gay marriage is utterly valueless. A tennis ball is good for playing and an Orange is good for eating. But, what is ‘gay marriage’ good for? Gays cannot have kids. I know of no child that was born of a man having sex with another man or two women being sexual together. So, homosexuality is not the equal of heterosexuality. A ‘gay family’ is a culturally constructed fantasy as no life can be created by homosexual behavior. Gay people have to engage in heterosexual behavior themselves to create life or they have to adopt children produced by heterosexual unions. So, in a ‘gay family’, the child(though created through heterosexual union) is denied the healthy and normal attentions of a father and mother but instead led to believe that he’s the product of two men sleeping with one another or two women doing much the same together. In other words, ‘gay marriage’ is a pathetic lie. It is not same as real marriage; it is not even equal in value with real marriage. It is a monstrous perversion of the concept of marriage, either for the purpose of undermining the foundations of our civilization so as to bring forth social breakdown whereupon a wholly radical new order will be built OR for the purpose of feeling oh-so-morally-hip-and-narcissistic among airheaded liberals who’ve been brainwashed by pop culture and radical professors into thinking it’s uncool and lame to oppose ‘gay marriage’.
It’s time for Christians to stop being afraid of the word ‘equality’. It’s about time Christians said, “not only is ‘gay marriage’ not equal to real marriage but that the very concept of marriage equality is a really stupid idea.” Marriage has its own meaning, purpose, values, and design. It is what it is according to its needs, purpose, and meaning. It is a form of human relationship with its own set of rules. Indeed, if we are to expand on the definition of marriage, why not call every relationship a form of marriage? Why not call the relationship between employer and employee a marriage? Why not call the relationship between a coach and his players a marriage? Why not call the relationship between a movie director and actor a marriage? After all, ‘marriage’ has been used metaphorically, as in ‘marriage made in hell’, ‘marriage of talents’, etc. Why not turn metaphors into literal meanings? And, what’s with American Idol saying some people sing better? Can’t have that, can we? Why not say all people have the same singing talent and that ‘bad singing’ is actually good singing except that we don’t know it yet because we are badsingophobes?
So rather than posting a bunch of verses about how God sees Homosexuality and Gay Marriage, I thought I would use reason. The People who have engaged in this know which side of the issue God is for, they know what they are doing. But sometimes its up to us to make each other realize just how silly the people who oppose the truth are.
excuses for the dumb person’s failures or by redefining intelligence. All sides try to justify their views or position on the basis of equality–one kind or another. So, it’s only natural that the people pushing the gay agenda use the equality argument for ‘gay marriage’. They say gay couples should have equal right to marriage as normal or heterosexual couples do. And, if such is not provided for them, society is evil, wicked, and oppressive.
Of course, equality is not synonymous with sameness. Sameness means that two things are alike. Equality means bestowing equal value to two things which may or may not be alike. For instance, an orange and a tennis ball are not the same, but they can have equal value if both cost $1. But, only a fool would say a tennis ball should be categorized as a food item because its monetary value is equal to that of an apple. They are of equal value but not the same thing.The problem of marriage equality is more serious because gay marriage is utterly valueless. A tennis ball is good for playing and an Orange is good for eating. But, what is ‘gay marriage’ good for? Gays cannot have kids. I know of no child that was born of a man having sex with another man or two women being sexual together. So, homosexuality is not the equal of heterosexuality. A ‘gay family’ is a culturally constructed fantasy as no life can be created by homosexual behavior. Gay people have to engage in heterosexual behavior themselves to create life or they have to adopt children produced by heterosexual unions. So, in a ‘gay family’, the child(though created through heterosexual union) is denied the healthy and normal attentions of a father and mother but instead led to believe that he’s the product of two men sleeping with one another or two women doing much the same together. In other words, ‘gay marriage’ is a pathetic lie. It is not same as real marriage; it is not even equal in value with real marriage. It is a monstrous perversion of the concept of marriage, either for the purpose of undermining the foundations of our civilization so as to bring forth social breakdown whereupon a wholly radical new order will be built OR for the purpose of feeling oh-so-morally-hip-and-narcissistic among airheaded liberals who’ve been brainwashed by pop culture and radical professors into thinking it’s uncool and lame to oppose ‘gay marriage’.
It’s time for Christians to stop being afraid of the word ‘equality’. It’s about time Christians said, “not only is ‘gay marriage’ not equal to real marriage but that the very concept of marriage equality is a really stupid idea.” Marriage has its own meaning, purpose, values, and design. It is what it is according to its needs, purpose, and meaning. It is a form of human relationship with its own set of rules. Indeed, if we are to expand on the definition of marriage, why not call every relationship a form of marriage? Why not call the relationship between employer and employee a marriage? Why not call the relationship between a coach and his players a marriage? Why not call the relationship between a movie director and actor a marriage? After all, ‘marriage’ has been used metaphorically, as in ‘marriage made in hell’, ‘marriage of talents’, etc. Why not turn metaphors into literal meanings? And, what’s with American Idol saying some people sing better? Can’t have that, can we? Why not say all people have the same singing talent and that ‘bad singing’ is actually good singing except that we don’t know it yet because we are badsingophobes?
So rather than posting a bunch of verses about how God sees Homosexuality and Gay Marriage, I thought I would use reason. The People who have engaged in this know which side of the issue God is for, they know what they are doing. But sometimes its up to us to make each other realize just how silly the people who oppose the truth are.
) person say they are married, I interpret as under the church and 'god'. If they're non-religious, I will assume otherwise. If we get into collective language when referring about marriage to the masses, i'd make a distinction between the two to avoid confusion if I meant to distinguish them.
