Hardly as you continue to make uninformed assumptions. Jesus opened the scriptures and taught them to the Jews opening their understanding to things that were there which they did not see because they were hidden. The NT is the completion of the OT it fills in the missing information to reveal Christ. Jesus promised us that the Holy Spirit would lead us into the truth contained in the word of God.
So what are you saying? That you have a mystical understanding of what the passage says, gained through some mystical means, even though the words in the passage do not match up with your interpretation? That is ironic considering your position on spiritual gifts. The passage does not match up with what you say it means. You even agreed that you know in part, which is the way Paul described the situation before the perfect comes.
If you want people to follow you, to think that your special insight-- even if it doesn't match what the scriptures actually say-- is true, why should we do that? You frequently respond toward others with snark and condescension and what you are saying just doesn't match the words of the passage. Why should someone trust a stranger on the Internet to mediate their understanding of the Bible when their interpretation doesn't even match the words on the page?
Would I suggest that a soul in search of salvation seek such in a Pentecostal church? Soul winning is the responsibility of individual saints who know the Lord as Savior. Sending new believers into churches where the discipleship is suspect is a large part of the problem we have in todays church. I would not send them to catholic churches, JW assemblies nor most mainline denominational churches. Pentecostal churches and reformed churches are not much better. I would advise them to seek an independent Baptist or independent bible church as having better prospects of having sound doctrine.
Sending people to church to 'get saved' as opposed to sharing the Gospel with them first does not seem to be the apostles' approach to evangelism. There do seem to be some kind people in independent Baptist churches. The Druggar's seemed nice, though one of them was in the news for some stuff that wasn't so great. But the movement is also a hub for country boy ignarant theology, like radical King James only-ism, and there are also churches that are tolerant of 'tell it like it is' (or 'aint) know-it-all ornary preachers. My sister went to one where a preacher at a 'revival' used the N-word to refer to blacks. I've never seen that in a Pentecostal church or any evangelical church I've attended.
There is guy on YouTube who got YouTube famous after getting bashed up when he wouldn't open his trunk for law enforcement who preaches lots of crazy stuff, some of it quite unbiblical, and not suitable for church-- like saying aspects of the holocaust didn't happen, who berrated some guy and kicked him out of the church in an ugly manner for hearing second-hand that the man had talked about him or the church without following anything resembling Matthew 18 or allowing a chance for reconciliation. Some of the churches don't seem to be a culture open to Biblical plurality of elders and a number of Biblical doctrines.
