I can only go by the language and possibilities given in the word...
A. When John pens Revelation in the late 1st century A.D....the beast...
1. that was <-past tense (already been)
2. is not <-present tense (at that time not present or alive)
3. Shall ascend OUT OF THE PIT<-FUTURE TENSE (yet future advent after being once, then gone)
Only two entities have the title THE (definite article) Son of Perdition
The beast that shall come (man of sin) and JUDAS ISCARIOT that was alive (past tense) IS NOT (present tense) when Revelation penned and with a POSSIBLE FUTURE ADVENT (ascension from the pit, his current location)
NOT SAYIN it is Judas, but the language does fit and I cannot ignore the Greek definite article -->THE
A. When John pens Revelation in the late 1st century A.D....the beast...
1. that was <-past tense (already been)
2. is not <-present tense (at that time not present or alive)
3. Shall ascend OUT OF THE PIT<-FUTURE TENSE (yet future advent after being once, then gone)
Only two entities have the title THE (definite article) Son of Perdition
The beast that shall come (man of sin) and JUDAS ISCARIOT that was alive (past tense) IS NOT (present tense) when Revelation penned and with a POSSIBLE FUTURE ADVENT (ascension from the pit, his current location)
NOT SAYIN it is Judas, but the language does fit and I cannot ignore the Greek definite article -->THE