What does scripture say about this?
I'm not sure if me answering that question is going to help me. (might have trouble retaining things, so I might not know what you're asking about) (also I might have submitted this post not really sure if I had everything right)
I'm not sure if me answering that question is going to help me. (might have trouble retaining things, so I might not know what you're asking about) (also I might have submitted this post not really sure if I had everything right)
Yes, Jesus took the punishment for our sins.So Jesus took the punishment for our sins? (is it right to use the word sins?)
No, it appears pagan because it centers around the idea of "propitiating" an angry deity. I don't see in the Bible any grounds for declaring that God is some angry and wrathful being who needs to be placated by virgin blood, and instead see every grounds for seeing God as a loving father sacrificing everything so that the wayward child can be brought back into right standing. The idea of satisfaction pits God the Father, the angry deity, against God the Son, the worthy sacrifice. The very idea of satisfaction seems something foreign to the picture of sin and atonement that I find myself confronted with from the pages of Genesis until the passion.Bbrdrd it appears pagan because it looks like there's no call to transformation to go along with the sacrifice? eg make sacrifice, make the rains come/land fertile, carry on as normal?
But the Holy Spirit is what makes it more than that kind of thing. Some of the theological problems seem to be caused by leaving the Holy Spirit out and trying to create answers by the back door.
That approach doesn't work in maths or science that now embraces 'meta physics' in unthinkable ways not because they suddenly got 'spiritual' but the data coming back led them to it.
Instead of me writing out scripture, I propose that you check out the words anger, and wrath, in the concordance, in regard to God, and sins propitiation. Hell fire for the devil and his angels, and the ungodly as well. Sodom and Gomora are other examples of God's hatred and judgement for sin. Most "opinions do not line up with the word of God, but if given, they must be straight arrow in that they are doctrinally sound.There are two questions here, since if you mean was Jesus punished on account of the sinfulness of man there is no Scriptural answer but yes. However, most when they say such a thing mean to say that Jesus was a satisfaction for our sins. I see no Scriptural support to this idea, though much of modern theology turns on it. Instead it seems that there was a progression from Anselm proposing that Jesus was a satisfaction for God's honor until Calvin proposing that Jesus was a satisfaction for God's wrath. All of these rely on extraBiblical assumptions and present God as a pagan deity more than the true God that is presented in the Bible, in my opinion.
Looking up those things will in no way allude to a picture of the atonement that pits an angry God the Father against God the Son as a means of placation. The whole of satisfaction of wrath revolves around pagan concepts of sin and atonement rather than Scriptural foundations.Instead of me writing out scripture, I propose that you check out the words anger, and wrath, in the concordance, in regard to God, and sins propitiation. Hell fire for the devil and his angels, and the ungodly as well. Sodom and Gomora are other examples of God's hatred and judgement for sin. Most "opinions do not line up with the word of God, but if given, they must be straight arrow in that they are doctrinally sound.
Looking up those things will in no way allude to a picture of the atonement that pits an angry God the Father against God the Son as a means of placation. The whole of satisfaction of wrath revolves around pagan concepts of sin and atonement rather than Scriptural foundations.
Yeah, I definitely wouldn't deny God is wrathful. But God's wrath is unlike man's wrath in that it is directed against the guilty alone and it is primarily restorative rather than punitive.But the does not negate God's wrath, it just wasn't part of the cross. Revelation deals with the wrath of God.
Yeah, I definitely wouldn't deny God is wrathful. But God's wrath is unlike man's wrath in that it is directed against the guilty alone and it is primarily restorative rather than punitive.
Yeah, I definitely wouldn't deny God is wrathful. But God's wrath is unlike man's wrath in that it is directed against the guilty alone and it is primarily restorative rather than punitive.