Are you a Trinitarian, and if so, can you defend the doctrine?
- Thread starter UnitedWithChrist
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
My definition is a bit up in the air due to most Unitarians I have met don’t agree on some profound things . Some practice some form of Sabellianism while others seem to follow Arianism . You also have those that are universalist. . Still others just only say they just deny the Trinity . It’s a mixed bag .
One group says this about themselves that their religious movement is base on reason and experience . The later ones view of scripture is only to be imagined
So my definition is way to open to be precise .
You just inserted the only here . Why. Your other post did not have it .
As for being a retired prof what dose that mean . I know two theology and biblical languages professors that disagree with you . Past or current professions add no validity to a statement. One can be educated and wrong or educated and correct .
No insult intended.
Blessings
Bill
One group says this about themselves that their religious movement is base on reason and experience . The later ones view of scripture is only to be imagined
So my definition is way to open to be precise .
You just inserted the only here . Why. Your other post did not have it .
As for being a retired prof what dose that mean . I know two theology and biblical languages professors that disagree with you . Past or current professions add no validity to a statement. One can be educated and wrong or educated and correct .
No insult intended.
Blessings
Bill
-
1
- Show all
Okay. Thanks.
For clarification. Perhaps in anticipation of what you wrote above. I can discuss the issues you raised if you or anyone else is interested but I didn’t want to digress from the main point.
It means that I no longer teach theology at a school.
I don’t know any professors who disagree with my position that the only person who is the God of Jesus is the Father. Nor do I know of any professor who would dispute that a person who believes their God to be only one person, the Father, is unitarian.
No offense taken.
For clarification. Perhaps in anticipation of what you wrote above. I can discuss the issues you raised if you or anyone else is interested but I didn’t want to digress from the main point.
It means that I no longer teach theology at a school.
I don’t know any professors who disagree with my position that the only person who is the God of Jesus is the Father. Nor do I know of any professor who would dispute that a person who believes their God to be only one person, the Father, is unitarian.
No offense taken.
The bible did it.
Paul did it
Thomas did it.
Catholics have the trinity correct.
If you make the perfect sacrifice on the cross who resurrected himself anything but God,there is no salvation.
You can not sit at Gods table and disenfranchise Jesus at the same time.
Either your mentors or some mental salvation dynamic,will be your downfall.
At some point of the walk the trinity must be embraced or you spit on God.
Reject God's testimony.
Paul did it
Thomas did it.
Catholics have the trinity correct.
If you make the perfect sacrifice on the cross who resurrected himself anything but God,there is no salvation.
You can not sit at Gods table and disenfranchise Jesus at the same time.
Either your mentors or some mental salvation dynamic,will be your downfall.
At some point of the walk the trinity must be embraced or you spit on God.
Reject God's testimony.
J
just so i understand correctly, if people want to teach others that Jesus commands us to believe He is the Most High, this is perfectly acceptable.
if someone asks where Jesus teaches these things because no such teachings exist, its bad logic? im assuming this is what you mean. "strawman" means no substance which really doesnt apply.
is this what you really believe, that what Jesus actually taught, and what people say He taught are no different. if someone says Jesus commands we wear big purple hats on tuesday and run around the back yard naked we should just do it without question?
if someone asks where Jesus teaches these things because no such teachings exist, its bad logic? im assuming this is what you mean. "strawman" means no substance which really doesnt apply.
is this what you really believe, that what Jesus actually taught, and what people say He taught are no different. if someone says Jesus commands we wear big purple hats on tuesday and run around the back yard naked we should just do it without question?